Last visit was: 17 Jul 2024, 11:43 It is currently 17 Jul 2024, 11:43
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94383
Own Kudos [?]: 641737 [11]
Given Kudos: 85693
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2021
Posts: 227
Own Kudos [?]: 194 [2]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: Turkey
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.69
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2022
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [3]
Given Kudos: 20
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94383
Own Kudos [?]: 641737 [1]
Given Kudos: 85693
Re: The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Bunuel wrote:
The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.

(A) The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.

(B) The British hospitality industry’s cost by the end of the decade to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is estimated at \$2 billion a year.

(C) By the end of the decade, the British hospitality industry’s cost of addressing issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion a year.

(D) It is estimated that by the end of the decade the cost to the British hospitality industry of addressing issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations will be over \$2 billion a year.

(E) To address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations, the cost to the British hospitality industry is estimated at over \$2 billion a year by the end of the decade.

 This Month's Questions are Sponsored by Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

Project SC Butler

Experts' Global Official Explanation:

Meaning + Modifiers + Idioms + Redundancy/Awkwardness

The intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that it is estimated that by the end of the decade it will cost the industry \$2 billion per year to address certain issues.

• The simple future tense is used to refer to actions that will take place in the future.
• The simple present tense is used to indicate actions taking place in the current time frame, indicate habitual actions, state universal truths, and convey information that is permanent in nature.

A. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the present tense verb “is projected at” to refer to an action that will take place in the future, as indicated by the modifying phrase “by the end of the decade”.

B. This answer choice expresses the idea of certain costs incurred by an industry reaching a certain level by the end of the decade by modifying the noun phrase “industry’s cost by the end of the decade” with the present tense phrase “is estimated at \$2 billion a year”; this is an awkward method of conveying this idea, as the same meaning can be conveyed more efficiently by referring to the cost in the future tense.

C. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the present tense verb “is projected at” to refer to an event that will logically take place in the future, as indicated by the modifying phrase “by the end of the decade”.

D. Correct. This answer choice conveys the intended meaning of the sentence that it is estimated that by the end of the decade it will cost the industry \$2 billion per year to address certain issues. Further, Option D correctly uses the simple future tense verb “will be” to refer to a future event. Additionally, Option D is free of awkwardness and redundancy.

E. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations” to modify the clause “the cost to the British hospitality industry is estimated at over \$2 billion a year”, incorrectly implying that the action of estimating the cost was taken for the purpose of addressing issues caused by visa regulations. The intended meaning is that it is estimated that by the end of the decade it will cost the industry \$2 billion per year to address certain issues.

D is the best answer choice.
VP
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 1472
Own Kudos [?]: 2325 [0]
Given Kudos: 114
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.

(A) The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.

(B) The British hospitality industry’s cost by the end of the decade to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is estimated at \$2 billion a year.

(C) By the end of the decade, the British hospitality industry’s cost of addressing issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion a year.

(D) It is estimated that by the end of the decade the cost to the British hospitality industry of addressing issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations will be over \$2 billion a year.

(E) To address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations, the cost to the British hospitality industry is estimated at over \$2 billion a year by the end of the decade.

 This Month's Questions are Sponsored by Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

Project SC Butler

Experts' Global Official Explanation:

Meaning + Modifiers + Idioms + Redundancy/Awkwardness

The intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that it is estimated that by the end of the decade it will cost the industry \$2 billion per year to address certain issues.

• The simple future tense is used to refer to actions that will take place in the future.
• The simple present tense is used to indicate actions taking place in the current time frame, indicate habitual actions, state universal truths, and convey information that is permanent in nature.

A. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the present tense verb “is projected at” to refer to an action that will take place in the future, as indicated by the modifying phrase “by the end of the decade”.

B. This answer choice expresses the idea of certain costs incurred by an industry reaching a certain level by the end of the decade by modifying the noun phrase “industry’s cost by the end of the decade” with the present tense phrase “is estimated at \$2 billion a year”; this is an awkward method of conveying this idea, as the same meaning can be conveyed more efficiently by referring to the cost in the future tense.

C. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the present tense verb “is projected at” to refer to an event that will logically take place in the future, as indicated by the modifying phrase “by the end of the decade”.

D. Correct. This answer choice conveys the intended meaning of the sentence that it is estimated that by the end of the decade it will cost the industry \$2 billion per year to address certain issues. Further, Option D correctly uses the simple future tense verb “will be” to refer to a future event. Additionally, Option D is free of awkwardness and redundancy.

E. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations” to modify the clause “the cost to the British hospitality industry is estimated at over \$2 billion a year”, incorrectly implying that the action of estimating the cost was taken for the purpose of addressing issues caused by visa regulations. The intended meaning is that it is estimated that by the end of the decade it will cost the industry \$2 billion per year to address certain issues.

D is the best answer choice.

So the main issue with (A) as explained by Experts' Global：this answer choice incorrectly uses the present tense verb “is projected at” to refer to an action that will take place in the future.
Let's modify the verb tense to be simple future tense:
The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations will be projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.
Is the sentence above considered an acceptable version? Does the change make sense?
While the projection is for the cost in the future, the action "project" can definitely and probably should take place now.
Another example sentence:
The global athletic footwear market is predicted to be worth \$100bn by 2028.
It is correct as written. Do not change "is predicted" to be "will be predicted".
Manager
Joined: 08 Mar 2021
Posts: 135
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 304
Re: The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t [#permalink]
zhanbo wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.

(A) The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.

(B) The British hospitality industry’s cost by the end of the decade to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is estimated at \$2 billion a year.

(C) By the end of the decade, the British hospitality industry’s cost of addressing issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion a year.

(D) It is estimated that by the end of the decade the cost to the British hospitality industry of addressing issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations will be over \$2 billion a year.

(E) To address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations, the cost to the British hospitality industry is estimated at over \$2 billion a year by the end of the decade.

 This Month's Questions are Sponsored by Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

Project SC Butler

Experts' Global Official Explanation:

Meaning + Modifiers + Idioms + Redundancy/Awkwardness

The intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that it is estimated that by the end of the decade it will cost the industry \$2 billion per year to address certain issues.

• The simple future tense is used to refer to actions that will take place in the future.
• The simple present tense is used to indicate actions taking place in the current time frame, indicate habitual actions, state universal truths, and convey information that is permanent in nature.

A. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the present tense verb “is projected at” to refer to an action that will take place in the future, as indicated by the modifying phrase “by the end of the decade”.

B. This answer choice expresses the idea of certain costs incurred by an industry reaching a certain level by the end of the decade by modifying the noun phrase “industry’s cost by the end of the decade” with the present tense phrase “is estimated at \$2 billion a year”; this is an awkward method of conveying this idea, as the same meaning can be conveyed more efficiently by referring to the cost in the future tense.

C. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the present tense verb “is projected at” to refer to an event that will logically take place in the future, as indicated by the modifying phrase “by the end of the decade”.

D. Correct. This answer choice conveys the intended meaning of the sentence that it is estimated that by the end of the decade it will cost the industry \$2 billion per year to address certain issues. Further, Option D correctly uses the simple future tense verb “will be” to refer to a future event. Additionally, Option D is free of awkwardness and redundancy.

E. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations” to modify the clause “the cost to the British hospitality industry is estimated at over \$2 billion a year”, incorrectly implying that the action of estimating the cost was taken for the purpose of addressing issues caused by visa regulations. The intended meaning is that it is estimated that by the end of the decade it will cost the industry \$2 billion per year to address certain issues.

D is the best answer choice.

So the main issue with (A) as explained by Experts' Global：this answer choice incorrectly uses the present tense verb “is projected at” to refer to an action that will take place in the future.
Let's modify the verb tense to be simple future tense:
The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations will be projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.
Is the sentence above considered an acceptable version? Does the change make sense?
While the projection is for the cost in the future, the action "project" can definitely and probably should take place now.
Another example sentence:
The global athletic footwear market is predicted to be worth \$100bn by 2028.
It is correct as written. Do not change "is predicted" to be "will be predicted".
absolutely agree. the act of projection must take place now.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2020
Posts: 88
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 120
Re: The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t [#permalink]
Projected To Be is the correct idiom, am I right? Because there is a GMAT question where Projected at was incorrect. Projected to be is correct. But since none of them have that as the option, I chose will be over.
VP
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 1472
Own Kudos [?]: 2325 [0]
Given Kudos: 114
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t [#permalink]
Rainman91 wrote:
Projected To Be is the correct idiom, am I right? Because there is a GMAT question where Projected at was incorrect. Projected to be is correct. But since none of them have that as the option, I chose will be over.

The GMAT question you mentioned must be the one below:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-united-s ... 64021.html

Indeed, this question options closely resemble that GMAT question's.

I am not sure, though, whether "be projected at" is absolutely wrong in the GMAT land.
Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2022
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 366
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.65
Re: The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t [#permalink]
zhanbo Bunuel

1. \$2 billion by the end of the decade
2. \$2 billion a year

Is there any difference between these two things?
isn't the meaning changed in all the choices?

In question, it is conveyed that the total cost will be \$2 billion whereas all the choices, except A, convey that the total cost will be \$20 billion.

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94383
Own Kudos [?]: 641737 [0]
Given Kudos: 85693
Re: The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.

(A) The British hospitality industry’s cost to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion by the end of the decade.

(B) The British hospitality industry’s cost by the end of the decade to address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is estimated at \$2 billion a year.

(C) By the end of the decade, the British hospitality industry’s cost of addressing issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations is projected at \$2 billion a year.

(D) It is estimated that by the end of the decade the cost to the British hospitality industry of addressing issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations will be over \$2 billion a year.

(E) To address issues related to the new and more stringent visa regulations, the cost to the British hospitality industry is estimated at over \$2 billion a year by the end of the decade.

 This Month's Questions are Sponsored by Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

Project SC Butler

Experts' Global Video Explanation:

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17503
Own Kudos [?]: 868 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: The British hospitality industrys cost to address issues related to t [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6984 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts