Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jul 1206:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join our webinar to master GMAT RC Main Point Questions! Learn effective strategies to decipher passage themes and purposes. Senior Verbal Expert- Sunita Singhvi will equip you with tools to navigate complexities and avoid common traps set by the GMAT.
Jul 1211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to learn how to Deconstruct arguments, Pre-Think Author’s Assumptions, and apply Negation Test.
Jun 3008:00 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
Join us June 30th for 2 weeks of GMAT questions (just 8 per day) to help with your prep and to compete with your fellow GMAT Clubbers for a chance to win a prize fund of $30,000 for you and your team-mates!
Jul 0901:00 PM EDT
-02:00 PM EDT
More Target Test Prep students are earning 100th percentile GMAT scores. Don’t settle for less when the Target Test Prep course gives you everything you need to score high on the GMAT. Start your 5-day free trial today.
Jul 1311:00 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EDT
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Jul 1508:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Jul 1611:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Updated on: 18 Oct 2020, 01:30
Originally posted by nuevamateo20 on 17 Oct 2020, 18:30.
Last edited by Bunuel on 18 Oct 2020, 01:30, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Bunuel on 18 Oct 2020, 01:30, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic.
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
49% (01:54) correct
51%
(01:58)
wrong
based on 497
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The difference between manners and morals is that the former are necessarily social in nature whereas the latter are not necessarily social in nature. So the rules of etiquette do not apply when one is alone.
The state above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following inferences?
A. One could be immoral without ever having caused any other person any harm.
B. No immoral act could be a violation of the rules of etiquette.
C. The rules of morality apply only when one is alone.
D. It is more important to be moral than to have good manners.
E. What is social in nature could not be a matter of morality.
Source: LSAT.
The state above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following inferences?
A. One could be immoral without ever having caused any other person any harm.
B. No immoral act could be a violation of the rules of etiquette.
C. The rules of morality apply only when one is alone.
D. It is more important to be moral than to have good manners.
E. What is social in nature could not be a matter of morality.
Source: LSAT.
ravigupta2912
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 726
15 Nov 2020, 02:28
Kudos
Bookmarks
The difference between manners and morals is that the former are necessarily social in nature whereas the latter are not necessarily social in nature. So the rules of etiquette do not apply when one is alone.
Manners = necessarily social
Morals = not necessarily social
Rules of etiquette = don't apply when one is alone AKA rules are etiquette are about manners (morality - maybe?)
A. One could be immoral without ever having caused any other person any harm. -- Correct. Since morals are not necessarily social therefore, one can be immoral in private while being mannered in socials.
B. No immoral act could be a violation of the rules of etiquette. -- Not all moral acts are "not social". Some may be social, some not. Those immoral acts which are social could violate the rules of etiquette. Incorrect.
C. The rules of morality apply only when one is alone. -- "only" is incorrect. The stem says "not necessarily". Sufficient but not necessary condition. Incorrect.
D. It is more important to be moral than to have good manners. -- Completely irrelevant. Eliminate.
E. What is social in nature could not be a matter of morality. -- Similar to B. Morality can be social or private (not social). Eliminate.
Manners = necessarily social
Morals = not necessarily social
Rules of etiquette = don't apply when one is alone AKA rules are etiquette are about manners (morality - maybe?)
A. One could be immoral without ever having caused any other person any harm. -- Correct. Since morals are not necessarily social therefore, one can be immoral in private while being mannered in socials.
B. No immoral act could be a violation of the rules of etiquette. -- Not all moral acts are "not social". Some may be social, some not. Those immoral acts which are social could violate the rules of etiquette. Incorrect.
C. The rules of morality apply only when one is alone. -- "only" is incorrect. The stem says "not necessarily". Sufficient but not necessary condition. Incorrect.
D. It is more important to be moral than to have good manners. -- Completely irrelevant. Eliminate.
E. What is social in nature could not be a matter of morality. -- Similar to B. Morality can be social or private (not social). Eliminate.
