GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 26 May 2018, 01:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

9 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2694
Location: New York City
The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 21 Apr 2016, 09:09
9
This post received
KUDOS
28
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (00:36) correct 21% (00:49) wrong based on 1848 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Edit: This discussion has retired. Find the new thread HERE


The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atoms are actively broken apart; rather a kind of nuclear battery that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power.

(A) apart; rather
(B) apart, but rather
(C) apart, but rather that of
(D) apart, but that of
(E) apart: it is that of

Originally posted by bmwhype2 on 18 Jun 2007, 08:39.
Last edited by walker on 21 Apr 2016, 09:09, edited 2 times in total.
3 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 359
Re: The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jun 2007, 08:57
3
This post received
KUDOS
think of it like this-

B) the energy source is not X, but rather a kind of Y

C) the energy source is not X, but rather that of a kind of Y

C is unnecessary and changes the meaning of the sentence, hence answer is B
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 601
Location: New Haven, CT
Re: The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jun 2007, 10:44
I agree with r019h. "that of" is too wordy and unnecessary.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 181
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Operations (Insurance)
The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 21 Jul 2017, 17:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atoms are actively broken apart; rather a kind of nuclear battery that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power.

(A) apart; rather
(B) apart, but rather
(C) apart, but rather that of
(D) apart, but that of
(E) apart; it is that of

isnt "a kind of nuclear battery ..." a clause? if yes, why cant i connect the 2 clauses with a semi colon using rather?Please explain

Originally posted by devinawilliam83 on 19 Jan 2012, 22:43.
Last edited by hazelnut on 21 Jul 2017, 17:32, edited 2 times in total.
OA Added
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 207
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2012, 23:05
2
This post received
KUDOS
Answer is B.

You can not use a semicolon since you do not have two independent clauses.

The following can not stand alone on its own:

Rather a kind of nuclear battery that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power.

It is dependent on the preceding clause. It is also unidiomatic. The idiom is - "not X, but rather Y"

So you have to stick with it. This eliminates A and E.

Parallelism eliminates C and D.

not a nuclear reactor, but rather a kind of battery. Adding that messes it all up.

Hope this helps.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 181
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Operations (Insurance)
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2012, 00:35
Thanks, would the following construction be right?
The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atoms are actively broken apart; it is a kind of nuclear battery that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power.?

also, isnt nuclear battery a noun and uses a verb for the sentence post the semi colon in the original question to qualify as a clause

just trying to get my concept clear
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 237
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2012, 09:24
The sentence requires the use of a conjunction which brings in contrast .Hence the use of but is a must here.I think an independent clause cannot begin with rather although there might be an independent subject and verb etc.The use of rather itself brings in a sense of dependency .
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 207
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2012, 17:16
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Thanks, would the following construction be right?
The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atoms are actively broken apart; it is a kind of nuclear battery that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power.?

also, isnt nuclear battery a noun and uses a verb for the sentence post the semi colon in the original question to qualify as a clause

just trying to get my concept clear


It appears correct to me. The only thing that could be questionable (for the record I think it is correct) is the pronoun reference to it. Logically "it" refers to the energy source on Voyager 2 so I think you are good to go. Someone correct me if they believe otherwise.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 317
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2012, 20:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
Isn't 'but rather' repetitive in the option B?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2011
Posts: 18
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2012, 03:20
Hi u0422811 i dont think so "It" is correct, beacuse It can refer to nuclear reactor also
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 656
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2012, 11:24
not an independent clause...
+1 B
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2502
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2012, 10:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
devinawilliam83 wrote:
The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atoms are actively broken apart; rather a kind of nuclear battery that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power.

(A) apart; rather
(B) apart, but rather
(C) apart, but rather that of
(D) apart, but that of
(E) apart; it is that of


isnt "a kind of nuclear battery ..." a clause? if yes, why cant i connect the 2 clauses with a semi colon using rather?Please explain


Hi,

The prerequisite for any clause is that it must have a subject and it must have a verb. Presence of SV pair makes a clause, either a dependent or an independent.

This sentence can be divided into following clauses:

The energy source on Voyager 2
is not a nuclear reactor (Independent Clause) (blue = subject, green = verb)

in which atoms are actively broken apart (Dependent clause)

rather a kind of nuclear battery

that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power. (dependent clause)

"rather a kind of nuclear battery" is not a clause because it does not have any verb. Together, this phrase and the last clause build a dependent clause that appears after the semicolon. This is the incorrect sentence structure.

Also note that for every clause, IC or DC, the SV pairs must be independent. The verb of one clause cannot play the role of verb for the subject of another clause.

devinawilliam83 wrote:
Thanks, would the following construction be right?
The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atoms are actively broken apart; it is a kind of nuclear battery that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power.?

also, isnt nuclear battery a noun and uses a verb for the sentence post the semi colon in the original question to qualify as a clause

just trying to get my concept clear


The sentence that you have cited is correct. "it" in the beginning of the second IC correctly refers to "The energy source on voyager 2" because they both are placed in the subject position of the ICs. This is from the grammatical standpoint. Logically also "it" refers to the same because the second IC is talking about "nuclear battery" which is a kind of "energy source" only.

Hope this helps.
Shraddha

Image
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 168
Re: The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2012, 19:30
1
This post received
KUDOS
I have chosen B for this question:

A. This answer choice does 2 things incorrectly - it splits the comparison into 2 independence clauses and the second clause is a fragment. There is no reason to include a semicolon because it is splitting up the comparison into 2 sentences.

B. This answer is correct because it follows the not X, but rather Y comparison. Also, the elements are parallel.

C. This answer is incorrect. Although it does follow not X, but rather Y, "that of" is a relative pronoun that refers to nothing.

D. "That" does not refer to anything.

E. Again, the semicolon is unnecessary because we want a sentence that clearly describes the comparison in one thought.
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2011
Posts: 96
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V37
GPA: 3.28
WE: Military Officer (Military & Defense)
Re: The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Mar 2012, 00:38
2
This post received
KUDOS
Undoubtedly B. Its very clear as the other sounds very awkward.
_________________

If you like my post, Press +1 KUDO. It is the best way to say Thanks .

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 131
Location: India
Re: The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2012, 12:10
Others sound wrong. Answer should be B
Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 268
Premium Member
Re: The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2012, 23:43
follows idiomatic expression not x, but rather y

a. use of semicolon wrong + not idiomatic
b. Correct
c. that of - reference error, there is no antecedent to this.
d. not idiomatic - rather missing
e. that of - reference error, there is no antecedent to this. + not idiomatic - rather missing
_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Posts: 106
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 530 Q42 V20
GMAT 2: 540 Q43 V28
GMAT 3: 680 Q48 V35
WE: Business Development (Hospitality and Tourism)
Re: The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2012, 00:22
IMO B.

A/D/E - wrong idiom
C - 'that of' - that has no referent
_________________

KUDOS - if my post has helped you.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 299
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
CAT Tests
Re: The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2012, 01:55
C is awkward construction. B is the clear winner.
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If my reply /analysis is helpful-->please press KUDOS
If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 402
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2012, 15:16
bsaikrishna wrote:
Isn't 'but rather' repetitive in the option B?
Can someone answer above point? This question brought me here in the forum. I ,in fact, striked this option being an convoluted repetitive option, when going through the options in the first run. Though, I got this question correct by selecting this choice in the second pass because I scratched all the choices, still want to know the best answer for this construction.

I know that "but rather" is OA, but wouldn't "but" only would be sufficient :
Shouldn't
(B) apart, but
or even
(B) apart, rather
work?
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Posts: 180
Schools: MIT / INSEAD / IIM - ABC
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2012, 02:27
devinawilliam83 wrote:
The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atoms are actively broken apart; rather a kind of nuclear battery that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power.

(A) apart; rather
(B) apart, but rather
(C) apart, but rather that of
(D) apart, but that of
(E) apart; it is that of


isnt "a kind of nuclear battery ..." a clause? if yes, why cant i connect the 2 clauses with a semi colon using rather?Please explain


Usage of "not X...but rather Y..."

A: semi-colon can't be used so eliminated
B. Should be it..
C. Introduces parallelism err "that of"
D. Parallelism & idiom errs
E. "that of" parallelism err
Re: The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atom   [#permalink] 30 Jul 2012, 02:27

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 53 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.