Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Updated on: 14 Sep 2021, 11:46
Originally posted by carcass on 07 Jun 2013, 17:01.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 14 Sep 2021, 11:46, edited 3 times in total.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 14 Sep 2021, 11:46, edited 3 times in total.
Updated - Complete topic (322).
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
59% (03:07) correct
41%
(03:02) wrong
based on 1216
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
80% (00:52) correct 20%
(01:11) wrong
based on 1207
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 3
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
86% (01:06) correct 14%
(01:21) wrong
based on 1197
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 4
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
33% (01:23) correct 67%
(01:22) wrong
based on 1207
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The fall of the Berlin Wall represented a political victory of the free market against a centrally planned economy. Though highly interventionist and dependent on international defense and industrial subsidy, West Germany was a model of economic expansion in the post-war era. East Germany, while relatively successful in comparison with other Eastern Bloc nations, was far behind West Germany with regard to the buying power of its people. It was hard to avoid obvious comparisons such as the fact that 1 in 4 East Germans did not even have an indoor toilet. Western German authorities were therefore committed to rapid integration of the two Germanys without resorting to massive controls on internal migration, external capital controls, or continuation of a large state-owned industrial sector.
Other nations were already wary of a united Germany. France, a perpetual competitor, saw Germany’s size advantage increase overnight. In Gross Domestic Product ("GDP") alone, an historical size advantage of 23% jumped to nearly 30%, with stronger growth promised when East Germany was fully integrated.
Within Germany, there should have been no doubt that integration would be costly. The question was whether the government was up to the task. In Italy, for example, the central government has invested tremendous resources in promoting the economy of its under-performing Southern region. In contrast, in the United States, the local population bears the burden of varying economic performance. For example, the American South is allowed to exist with much higher rates of poverty and lower education than the rest of the nation.
Rather than allow East Germany to fall into total disrepair, with millions fleeing to the West and a long-term negative impact on national GDP growth, West German authorities decided to try to spend their way out of the crisis, creating almost overnight an infrastructure in East Germany to provide a standard of living comparable to that in West Germany. The goal was to take an under-performing country and raise it to “first world” standards in only a few years. This goal would have been preposterous had not West Germany possessed the resources to accomplish the task.
Other nations were already wary of a united Germany. France, a perpetual competitor, saw Germany’s size advantage increase overnight. In Gross Domestic Product ("GDP") alone, an historical size advantage of 23% jumped to nearly 30%, with stronger growth promised when East Germany was fully integrated.
Within Germany, there should have been no doubt that integration would be costly. The question was whether the government was up to the task. In Italy, for example, the central government has invested tremendous resources in promoting the economy of its under-performing Southern region. In contrast, in the United States, the local population bears the burden of varying economic performance. For example, the American South is allowed to exist with much higher rates of poverty and lower education than the rest of the nation.
Rather than allow East Germany to fall into total disrepair, with millions fleeing to the West and a long-term negative impact on national GDP growth, West German authorities decided to try to spend their way out of the crisis, creating almost overnight an infrastructure in East Germany to provide a standard of living comparable to that in West Germany. The goal was to take an under-performing country and raise it to “first world” standards in only a few years. This goal would have been preposterous had not West Germany possessed the resources to accomplish the task.
1. According to the author, which of the following is the principal reason that German reunification could succeed?
A · The additional population from East Germany gave the reunified Germany an economic advantage over other European nations.
B · East Germany had not been as impoverished as other Eastern Bloc countries.
C · West Germany did not plan to control internal migration from East Germany.
D · West Germany patterned its economic plan after a successful Italian model.
E · West Germany was a materially stable country.
A · The additional population from East Germany gave the reunified Germany an economic advantage over other European nations.
B · East Germany had not been as impoverished as other Eastern Bloc countries.
C · West Germany did not plan to control internal migration from East Germany.
D · West Germany patterned its economic plan after a successful Italian model.
E · West Germany was a materially stable country.
2. The author mentions the United States most probably in order to
A· argue against a commonly held belief about market economies
B· provide an example of a situation seen as undesirable
C· suggest an advantageous solution to an economic problem
D· illustrate an economic principle called into question
E· demonstrate the positive consequences of economic freedom
A· argue against a commonly held belief about market economies
B· provide an example of a situation seen as undesirable
C· suggest an advantageous solution to an economic problem
D· illustrate an economic principle called into question
E· demonstrate the positive consequences of economic freedom
3. Which of the following best describes the way the first paragraph functions in the context of the passage?
A· A specific example is presented to illustrate the main elements of a general economic theory.
B· Evidence is presented in support of a revision of a commonly held view.
C· Information that is necessary for understanding the main argument of the passage is presented.
D· Questions are raised which are answered in subsequent paragraphs.
E· A qualified view of the author’s main point is contrasted with a less specific view.
A· A specific example is presented to illustrate the main elements of a general economic theory.
B· Evidence is presented in support of a revision of a commonly held view.
C· Information that is necessary for understanding the main argument of the passage is presented.
D· Questions are raised which are answered in subsequent paragraphs.
E· A qualified view of the author’s main point is contrasted with a less specific view.
4. The passage suggests which of the following about the relationship between West Germany and France?
A· Historically, the economy of West Germany had been more stable than that of France.
B· The Gross Domestic Product of West Germany had always been greater than that of France.
C· The size of West Germany’s population gave it an advantage over France in international trade.
D· France did not view its economic position relative to West Germany as immutable.
E· West Germany planned to use reunification to bolster ts economic advantage over France.
A· Historically, the economy of West Germany had been more stable than that of France.
B· The Gross Domestic Product of West Germany had always been greater than that of France.
C· The size of West Germany’s population gave it an advantage over France in international trade.
D· France did not view its economic position relative to West Germany as immutable.
E· West Germany planned to use reunification to bolster ts economic advantage over France.
Manhattan CAT 2
09 Jun 2013, 05:41
Kudos
Bookmarks
1.
The question asks us to identify the author's reason for believing that German
reunification could succeed. According to the last sentence of the passage,
"[reunification] would have been preposterous had not West Germany possessed the
resources to accomplish the task." In other words, West Germany was prosperous
enough to afford this major undertaking.
(A) The correct principal reason for success does not include attributes of East
Germany.
(B) The correct principal reason for success does not include attributes of East
Germany.
(C) Although this point is made in the passage, it is not the reason given for
reunification's success.
(D) This is not the reason given in the last sentence for reunification's success.
(E) CORRECT. This choice reflects the information we were looking for: the country
was "materially stable," or prosperous enough, to succeed.
2.
The question asks us to identify the reason that the author mentions the United
States in the passage. In the third paragraph, the author asks whether West
Germany was "up to the task" of re-unification. This is followed by the example of
Italy as a government that does spend the necessary resources to help its
underperforming regions. Then, the author mentions the United States as a
counterexample with negative overtones: "In contrast, in the United States, the local
population bears the burden of varying economic performance. For example, the
American South is allowed to exist with much higher rates of poverty and lower
education than the rest of the nation." [Emphasis added.]
The use of the word "allowed" suggests that the author does not approve of the
situation in the United States. Further, the very next paragraph begins . . ."Rather
than allow East Germany to fall into total disrepair . . . " as if to further contrast the
German government with that of the United States.
(A) The passage in general does not argue against any commonly held beliefs,
including the specific example about the United States. (B) CORRECT. This choice echoes our above analysis: the author views the
situation cited as "undesirable."
(C) The author disapproves of the cited example, so he would not offer it as a
possible advantageous solution to Germany's reunification.
(D) The passage does not call the principle into question; rather, the author indicates
disapproval of this particular approach.
(E) The author disapproves of the cited example; he would not offer it as a positive
lesson.
3.
The question asks us to identify the purpose of the first paragraph: what role does it
play in the context of the passage as a whole? The first paragraph presents historical
information about the relationship between East and West Germany. This
information is given as background to the subsequent paragraphs. We need to find
an answer choice that is consistent with this analysis.
(A) The relationship between East and West Germany is not merely one example of
a much larger general theory; the passage is about this specific circumstance.
(B) The passage does not seek to alter or revise a commonly held view, either in the
first paragraph or elsewhere.
(C) CORRECT. The first paragraph presents the background information necessary
to understand the claims made in the rest of the passage.
(D) The first paragraph does not raise questions; it provides facts as to the
relationship between East and West Germany at a specific point in time.
(E) The first paragraph does not provide two opposing points of view.
4.
The question asks us to infer something from the passage regarding the relationship
between West Germany and France. The passage notes that countries were "wary
of a united Germany" and next mentions that France, "a perpetual competitor, saw
Germany’s size advantage increase overnight." We need to find an answer choice
that can be deduced from this information alone; we cannot conclude too much. If
France is wary of Germany's impending larger size, then France must also be
worried that it will be negatively impacted by the change.
(A) The above information tells us nothing about the relative stabilities of the two
economies.
(B) The above information does not tell us the entire history of the relative GDPs of
the two countries. "Always" is too extreme.
(C) The above information does not mention either population or international trade
with respect to the two countries' economies.
(D) CORRECT. If France does not view its relative economic position as immutable,
or unable to be changed, then it is sensible for the country to worry that it might be
negatively impacted by the changes in Germany.
that West Germany specifically planned to
bolster its position over that of France.
The question asks us to identify the author's reason for believing that German
reunification could succeed. According to the last sentence of the passage,
"[reunification] would have been preposterous had not West Germany possessed the
resources to accomplish the task." In other words, West Germany was prosperous
enough to afford this major undertaking.
(A) The correct principal reason for success does not include attributes of East
Germany.
(B) The correct principal reason for success does not include attributes of East
Germany.
(C) Although this point is made in the passage, it is not the reason given for
reunification's success.
(D) This is not the reason given in the last sentence for reunification's success.
(E) CORRECT. This choice reflects the information we were looking for: the country
was "materially stable," or prosperous enough, to succeed.
2.
The question asks us to identify the reason that the author mentions the United
States in the passage. In the third paragraph, the author asks whether West
Germany was "up to the task" of re-unification. This is followed by the example of
Italy as a government that does spend the necessary resources to help its
underperforming regions. Then, the author mentions the United States as a
counterexample with negative overtones: "In contrast, in the United States, the local
population bears the burden of varying economic performance. For example, the
American South is allowed to exist with much higher rates of poverty and lower
education than the rest of the nation." [Emphasis added.]
The use of the word "allowed" suggests that the author does not approve of the
situation in the United States. Further, the very next paragraph begins . . ."Rather
than allow East Germany to fall into total disrepair . . . " as if to further contrast the
German government with that of the United States.
(A) The passage in general does not argue against any commonly held beliefs,
including the specific example about the United States. (B) CORRECT. This choice echoes our above analysis: the author views the
situation cited as "undesirable."
(C) The author disapproves of the cited example, so he would not offer it as a
possible advantageous solution to Germany's reunification.
(D) The passage does not call the principle into question; rather, the author indicates
disapproval of this particular approach.
(E) The author disapproves of the cited example; he would not offer it as a positive
lesson.
3.
The question asks us to identify the purpose of the first paragraph: what role does it
play in the context of the passage as a whole? The first paragraph presents historical
information about the relationship between East and West Germany. This
information is given as background to the subsequent paragraphs. We need to find
an answer choice that is consistent with this analysis.
(A) The relationship between East and West Germany is not merely one example of
a much larger general theory; the passage is about this specific circumstance.
(B) The passage does not seek to alter or revise a commonly held view, either in the
first paragraph or elsewhere.
(C) CORRECT. The first paragraph presents the background information necessary
to understand the claims made in the rest of the passage.
(D) The first paragraph does not raise questions; it provides facts as to the
relationship between East and West Germany at a specific point in time.
(E) The first paragraph does not provide two opposing points of view.
4.
The question asks us to infer something from the passage regarding the relationship
between West Germany and France. The passage notes that countries were "wary
of a united Germany" and next mentions that France, "a perpetual competitor, saw
Germany’s size advantage increase overnight." We need to find an answer choice
that can be deduced from this information alone; we cannot conclude too much. If
France is wary of Germany's impending larger size, then France must also be
worried that it will be negatively impacted by the change.
(A) The above information tells us nothing about the relative stabilities of the two
economies.
(B) The above information does not tell us the entire history of the relative GDPs of
the two countries. "Always" is too extreme.
(C) The above information does not mention either population or international trade
with respect to the two countries' economies.
(D) CORRECT. If France does not view its relative economic position as immutable,
or unable to be changed, then it is sensible for the country to worry that it might be
negatively impacted by the changes in Germany.
that West Germany specifically planned to
bolster its position over that of France.
General Discussion
23 Jun 2013, 08:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
hi carcass,
great passage.
i got 3/4....but with little extra time.
but i was unable to understand the explanation of question 4.
the whole passage talks about FRANCE and W. GERMANY in the following lines.
Other nations were already wary of a united Germany.
France, a perpetual competitor, saw Germany’s size advantage increase overnight.
In Gross Domestic Product ("GDP") alone, an historical size advantage of 23% jumped to nearly 30%, with stronger growth promised when East Germany was fully integrated.
on the basis we have to infer option D of question 4 WHICH IS:
France did not view its economic position relative to West Germany as immutable.
It means FRANCE view its economic position relative to W.GERMANY mutable( susceptible to change )
i was unable to get this based on this passage .
request you to elaborate on this.
great passage.
i got 3/4....but with little extra time.
but i was unable to understand the explanation of question 4.
the whole passage talks about FRANCE and W. GERMANY in the following lines.
Other nations were already wary of a united Germany.
France, a perpetual competitor, saw Germany’s size advantage increase overnight.
In Gross Domestic Product ("GDP") alone, an historical size advantage of 23% jumped to nearly 30%, with stronger growth promised when East Germany was fully integrated.
on the basis we have to infer option D of question 4 WHICH IS:
France did not view its economic position relative to West Germany as immutable.
It means FRANCE view its economic position relative to W.GERMANY mutable( susceptible to change )
i was unable to get this based on this passage .
request you to elaborate on this.
