Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1810:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
May 1212:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products. Ends 6/1
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- May 19
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep.... - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
20 Jan 2021, 07:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
78% (03:05) correct
22%
(02:52) wrong
based on 557
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
39% (00:58) correct 61%
(01:00) wrong
based on 588
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The Federal Aviation Administration, commonly known as the FAA, is the government agency tasked with regulating civil aviation in the United States. One of the FAA’s more prominent functions is to regulate the safety of the airline industry, which it does by creating and enforcing rules that govern the manufacture and operation of commercial aircraft. However, the FAA is also charged with a number of other responsibilities, including a mandate to promote civil aviation. Many of the FAA’s critics have argued that this role is directly incompatible with the agency’s primary duty to regulate safety and have called on Congress to redefine the FAA’s mission to exclude the duty to promote civil aviation from the agency’s list of responsibilities.
The critics’ concern is that the safety of the airline industry cannot be adequately regulated by the same agency that is supposed to promote the industry as a whole. According to the critics, if a safety issue were to arise, the FAA would have to weigh the potential harm that the airline industry would suffer due to increased regulation against the benefits of remedying the safety concern, which might lead to inaction by the FAA. For example, several leading safety advocates have recommended that the FAA prohibit the practice of allowing infants under two years old to fly as “lap children” and instead require a separate seat for all passengers regardless of age. Because many parents would opt out of flying if they were required to purchase separate tickets for their young children, the advocates’ recommendation would, if adopted, lead to a decline in airline ticket sales. The failure of the FAA to act on this proposal is, to many critics, a sign that the agency is more concerned with the potential loss of revenue to the airline industry than the potential loss of a young child’s life.
The critics’ claim is not entirely without merit, as it is common for the FAA to consider potential financial consequences when contemplating a new regulation. However, the critics fundamentally misunderstand the role that this cost-benefit analysis plays in the agency’s decision-making process. If the FAA enacts regulations that make plane tickets prohibitively expensive, people will instead travel by car, statistically a much more dangerous mode of transportation than flying. Thus, when the FAA declines to revise its “lap child” policy, it does so not to protect the airline industry’s revenues but to reduce the risks associated with travel for children and their parents. Moreover, there is a built-in safeguard to prevent the FAA from protecting revenues at the expense of travelers’ safety: if the FAA failed to act on a significant safety concern, the public would lose confidence in airline travel, causing harm to the industry itself. Ultimately, the FAA’s duty to promote commercial aviation serves to reinforce its safety mission rather than undermine it.
The critics’ concern is that the safety of the airline industry cannot be adequately regulated by the same agency that is supposed to promote the industry as a whole. According to the critics, if a safety issue were to arise, the FAA would have to weigh the potential harm that the airline industry would suffer due to increased regulation against the benefits of remedying the safety concern, which might lead to inaction by the FAA. For example, several leading safety advocates have recommended that the FAA prohibit the practice of allowing infants under two years old to fly as “lap children” and instead require a separate seat for all passengers regardless of age. Because many parents would opt out of flying if they were required to purchase separate tickets for their young children, the advocates’ recommendation would, if adopted, lead to a decline in airline ticket sales. The failure of the FAA to act on this proposal is, to many critics, a sign that the agency is more concerned with the potential loss of revenue to the airline industry than the potential loss of a young child’s life.
The critics’ claim is not entirely without merit, as it is common for the FAA to consider potential financial consequences when contemplating a new regulation. However, the critics fundamentally misunderstand the role that this cost-benefit analysis plays in the agency’s decision-making process. If the FAA enacts regulations that make plane tickets prohibitively expensive, people will instead travel by car, statistically a much more dangerous mode of transportation than flying. Thus, when the FAA declines to revise its “lap child” policy, it does so not to protect the airline industry’s revenues but to reduce the risks associated with travel for children and their parents. Moreover, there is a built-in safeguard to prevent the FAA from protecting revenues at the expense of travelers’ safety: if the FAA failed to act on a significant safety concern, the public would lose confidence in airline travel, causing harm to the industry itself. Ultimately, the FAA’s duty to promote commercial aviation serves to reinforce its safety mission rather than undermine it.
1. Which of the following best describes the author’s main idea?
(A) The FAA’s mandate to promote civil aviation is fundamentally incompatible with its duty to regulate the safety of commercial airline travel.
(B) The FAA is the government agency that oversees commercial aviation within the United States.
(C) In response to the critics’ claim that the FAA has incompatible mandates, Congress should remove the duty to promote civil aviation from the FAA’s list of responsibilities.
(D) Despite claims to the contrary, the FAA’s duty to promote civil aviation is not incompatible with its responsibility to regulate airline safety.
(E) The FAA’s decision to continue the practice of allowing lap children will ultimately save lives.
(A) The FAA’s mandate to promote civil aviation is fundamentally incompatible with its duty to regulate the safety of commercial airline travel.
(B) The FAA is the government agency that oversees commercial aviation within the United States.
(C) In response to the critics’ claim that the FAA has incompatible mandates, Congress should remove the duty to promote civil aviation from the FAA’s list of responsibilities.
(D) Despite claims to the contrary, the FAA’s duty to promote civil aviation is not incompatible with its responsibility to regulate airline safety.
(E) The FAA’s decision to continue the practice of allowing lap children will ultimately save lives.
2. The author refers to the “cost-benefit analysis” (Highlighted) undertaken by the FAA most likely in order to
(A) summarize the primary responsibilities of the FAA
(B) explain the rationale that underpins a policy decision made by the FAA
(C) question the ability of the FAA to balance two competing obligations
(D) criticize a policy decision made by the FAA
(E) defend the FAA’s ability to successfully manage its list of responsibilities
(A) summarize the primary responsibilities of the FAA
(B) explain the rationale that underpins a policy decision made by the FAA
(C) question the ability of the FAA to balance two competing obligations
(D) criticize a policy decision made by the FAA
(E) defend the FAA’s ability to successfully manage its list of responsibilities
santosh93
Joined: 07 Jul 2020
Last visit: 19 May 2022
Posts: 47
Given Kudos: 339
Location: India
Schools: NTU (D) MBS'23 (D) Warwick "23 (D) ISB '23 (D)
GRE 1: Q169 V152
GPA: 3.94
WE:Research (Manufacturing)
25 Feb 2021, 02:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
I have a concern with the current OA to question-2
According to the passage,
The author brings up a "cost-benefit analysis" to explain the FAA's stance to allow lap-children.
--Because we don't know if FAA is successful after allowing lap-children and
--"list of responsibilities", though in the passage it is stated that FAA has more functions but passage only focused on one responsibility i.e. safety. We don't know about the remaining items in the list and how FAA managed them.
I believe Option B is more convincing because of the words it used i.e. explains the reason(rationale) and supports(underpin) FAA's decision(to allow lap-children).
This is my understanding from the passage, I welcome any feedback on this explanation.
According to the passage,
Quote:
This clearly indicates FAA has a list of responsibilities besides regulating the safety of the airline.
The author brings up a "cost-benefit analysis" to explain the FAA's stance to allow lap-children.
Quote:
I have an issue with Option-E. Though the word "defend" is attractive but the issue is with later part, it uses the word "successfully" and "list".
--Because we don't know if FAA is successful after allowing lap-children and
--"list of responsibilities", though in the passage it is stated that FAA has more functions but passage only focused on one responsibility i.e. safety. We don't know about the remaining items in the list and how FAA managed them.
I believe Option B is more convincing because of the words it used i.e. explains the reason(rationale) and supports(underpin) FAA's decision(to allow lap-children).
This is my understanding from the passage, I welcome any feedback on this explanation.
General Discussion
12 Apr 2021, 08:41
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Explanation
2. The author refers to the “cost-benefit analysis” (Highlighted) undertaken by the FAA most likely in order to
Explanation
This question asks why the author discusses the FAA’s “cost-benefit analysis,” and the line reference places this quoted text in the third paragraph. Once again, this question does not require any additional research beyond the notes you’ve already taken. According to your notes, the third paragraph introduces and explains the author’s position, which is that the FAA’s duties are not incompatible. Because this is a defense of the FAA against the critics who claim that the agency is incapable of managing its competing responsibilities, (E) is the correct answer.
(A) is incorrect because the author’s summary of the FAA’s responsibilities is in the first paragraph, not the third.
(B) is incorrect because the author’s primary concern in the third paragraph is to defend the FAA, not merely to explain a lone policy decision. While the author offers a justification for the FAA’s position on lap children, she does so in order to support her broader point, which is that the agency is able to balance its responsibilities.
(C) and (D) are incorrect because the author does not “question” or “criticize” the FAA in the third paragraph. Those characterizations are more closely aligned with the critics, whose opinions are discussed in the first and second paragraphs.
Answer: E
Explanation
This question asks why the author discusses the FAA’s “cost-benefit analysis,” and the line reference places this quoted text in the third paragraph. Once again, this question does not require any additional research beyond the notes you’ve already taken. According to your notes, the third paragraph introduces and explains the author’s position, which is that the FAA’s duties are not incompatible. Because this is a defense of the FAA against the critics who claim that the agency is incapable of managing its competing responsibilities, (E) is the correct answer.
(A) is incorrect because the author’s summary of the FAA’s responsibilities is in the first paragraph, not the third.
(B) is incorrect because the author’s primary concern in the third paragraph is to defend the FAA, not merely to explain a lone policy decision. While the author offers a justification for the FAA’s position on lap children, she does so in order to support her broader point, which is that the agency is able to balance its responsibilities.
(C) and (D) are incorrect because the author does not “question” or “criticize” the FAA in the third paragraph. Those characterizations are more closely aligned with the critics, whose opinions are discussed in the first and second paragraphs.
Answer: E
