Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 0911:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 10
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to evaluate your current skill level, learn process skills, and solve through tough Arithmetic questions 
Nov 1305:30 AM PST
-06:00 PM PST
We are excited to bring you the Fall edition of the MBA Spotlight Fair! Meet admission officers from the top 20 MBA programs—including HBS, Stanford, and Wharton—as you prepare for Round 2 applications.
07 Nov 2021, 04:50
Kudos
Bookmarks
joemama142000
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.
(A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would
must be warned is a absolute command which is not required therefore out
(B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel
Similar reasoning as A and would is required in the end therefore out
(C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel
would is necessary in the end otherwise perfect however out
(D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would
will is something in the future which isn't appropriate since the patients has to be informed during the test therefore out
(E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would
THe subjective mood and meaninig is perfect therefore let us hang on to it
THerefore IMO E
20 Aug 2022, 06:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
in A] can't we say 'THAT' is common for both X and Y in parallel list. We have done that in many OG qsns. Please clarify what the rule. do we need two THAT all the time in such a parallel list ?
what is wrong in using ''must''
what is wrong in using ''must''
21 Aug 2022, 15:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
himanshu0123
in A] can't we say 'THAT' is common for both X and Y in parallel list.
This sentence works either with or without the second "that" (although it's much easier to understand if there are two instances of "that" than if there's just one).
One thing that should be very clear, very quickly, is that the verbs in the two parallel parts should appear in identical tenses. The parts describe two things that are both ensured by the same set of rules—definitely simultaneous observations.
The choices with only one "that" (A and D) have one of these verbs in the present/future (must or will), but the other one in the past (would = the past tense of will). There is no possible justification for mismatched tenses, so A and D are gone.
At that point you're left with choices that all contain two "that"s.
Quote:
what is wrong in using ''must''
Two problems.
1/ "Must" and "would" are in different tenses. That mismatch is untenable, for the reasons already explained.
2/ Ensure carries the meaning of guaranteeing that something will be true. Must conveys the same meaning. The use of both, therefore, is redundant.
