Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:16 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:16
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
655-705 Level|   Non-Math Related|               
User avatar
divyasaxena2825
User avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2022
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
11
Given Kudos: 342
Status:preparing for GMAT
Affiliations: -
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Economics
Schools: IIMA '26 Booth '27
GPA: 8.5
Schools: IIMA '26 Booth '27
Posts: 16
Kudos: 11
Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally 18 Dec 2024, 07:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We are comparing narrow AI and how it is leading towards general AI breakthroughs hence E is not the right answer.

Cellchat
I have a problem with the second column; the answer is out of the following IMO:

:- Research in the narrow AI field is not likely to lead to significant breakthroughs in the general AI field.

:-The research into narrow AI is not producing results that real people can benefit from today.

When in the stem does it talk about significant breakthroughs. Narrow AI could lead to small developments in the general AI field. You are inferring that the stem says significant.

And yes, you may also be doing some 'inferring' with the second statement. The statement talks about real people. But when does narrow AI do anything but benefit real people?! Chess, programs that translate speech to text, programs that can drive automated vehicles, all of these benefit real people. I feel as if this is even less of an inference step to make than the first (IMO).

Help would be appreciated.
Show more
   1   2 
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
105385 posts
kingbucky
496 posts