The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 Feb 2017, 03:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 585
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2005, 16:07
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:33) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.

11. The main conclusion of the argument is that
(A) Thomas was in the vicinity of the fire this morning
(B) Thomas claimed not to have seen the fire
(C) Thomas saw the fire this morning
(D) Thomas went directly from his apartment to the library this morning
(E) Thomas went by the Municipal Building this morning

12. The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?

(A) presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawn
(B) establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thing
(C) justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstances
(D) relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present case
(E) drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situation
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 560
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 07:15
C (Straight Shot)
D (Passage says: He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning)

C, D
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 08:00
A and D for me.

GA
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 560
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 08:15
oh shoot!

i am changing my first choice. it's (A). No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. The argument tries to prove (all the way) that thomas was in the vicinity, somehow.

(A) and (D)
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 166
Location: Atlanta , GA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 19:40
Arsene_Wenger wrote:
oh shoot!

i am changing my first choice. it's (A). No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. The argument tries to prove (all the way) that thomas was in the vicinity, somehow.

(A) and (D)

So the argument tries to prove that thomas has seen the fire and he is lying so
for me

C and B
SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Fire [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 19:51
11. C.
12. B.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 367 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2005, 21:29
Diagramming the argument:
1) The fire that destroyed Municipal building started before dawn
2) Last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon
3) No one could have been anywehre in the vicinity of the fire without noticing it
4) Thomas went to library this morning and must past the Municipal Building
5) Therefore, Thomas must have seen the fire <--conclusion

11. The main conclusion of the argument is that
(A) Thomas was in the vicinity of the fire this morning
(B) Thomas claimed not to have seen the fire
(C) Thomas saw the fire this morning
(D) Thomas went directly from his apartment to the library this morning
(E) Thomas went by the Municipal Building this morning

C for me.

12. The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques?

(A) presenting several different pieces of evidence each of which by itself would allow the conclusion to be properly drawn
- out.

(B) establishing that one thing occurred by showing that another thing occurred and that this second thing was enough to ensure the occurrence of the first thing
- Go with this. Established that one thing (Thomas saw the fire) by showing that another thing (has to pass by municipal building and fire was of a scale where it can't be missed)

(C) justifying a claim that a view held by someone else is false by explaining why that view, despite its falsity, is a tempting one for that person to hold under the circumstances
- Out of scope

(D) relying on evidence that a certain kind of event has regularly occurred in the past as a basis for concluding that an event of that kind occurred in the present case
- Out. Can't draw on the fact that a fire has ever happened before.

(E) drawing a general conclusion about what is possible in a certain kind of situation on the basis of firsthand experience with one such situation
- out. author has no firsthand experience

B it is.

I'll go with C and B for these two questions.
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2005, 12:08
Silly me! For the first one it is C and not A. I thot the question stem asked for an assumption than a conclusion!
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 560
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2005, 23:50
OK, something is wrong with me head!

(C) and (D) - changed again!
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 272
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Fire [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2005, 17:28
The main point of the argument is that thomas saw the fire...hence C

Second question...i pick B...its the only one that fits in with the way the argument is laid out as far as i can see
Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 585
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2005, 07:25
The OA's are C and B.
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 A proposal for a new building fire safety code requires that fire-ret 3 23 Feb 2016, 08:43
6 The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building 5 29 Jul 2014, 07:42
22 There are those who complain that municipal libraries are 16 21 Aug 2012, 12:49
3 In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect s 17 30 Oct 2010, 05:57
The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started 16 23 Apr 2010, 11:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.