GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Aug 2018, 20:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 750
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2014, 08:42
2
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (01:20) correct 50% (01:25) wrong based on 485 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

This is my new project: Renew Old Thread => Back to basic => Just try It and give your reasoning
The topic will be sticky for 2 days from starting


The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.

The main conclusion of the argument is that

(A) Thomas was in the vicinity of the fire this morning
(B) Thomas claimed not to have seen the fire
(C) Thomas saw the fire this morning
(D) Thomas went directly from his apartment to the library this morning
(E) Thomas went by the Municipal Building this morning

_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 768
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2014, 09:36
C it is: Thomas saw the fire this morning
Director
Director
User avatar
S
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 520
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Re: The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2017, 22:26
Top Contributor
try to simplify the argument -

the second sentence states a condition -
Vicinity of a fire that large --> notice the fire.

the next sentence -
he went from his apartment to library --> he has to go past the Municipal building --> he was in the vicinity of the fire.

If we combine the above two sentences we get -
he went from his apartment to library --> he has to go past the Municipal building --> he was in the vicinity of the fire --> notice the fire.

the last part is the conclusion. Hence, Option C.
This is mentioned in the sentence - "Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary."

A - Incorrect.
Even though this statement is correct, note that we can combine this with the first statement to get a further conclusion. That conclusion would be the final/main conclusion of the argument.

B - Incorrect.
this statement, although correct, is not the main conclusion. Note that the paragraph says - "Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary."
"whatever" here indicates a contrast, so the author does not agree with Thomas. Hence, Thomas's claim cannot be the main conclusion.

D - Incorrect.
this is an assumption, not the main conclusion.
If he did not go directly to the library, but went somewhere else from his apartment and from that place went to the library, the argument falls apart. (He need not necessarily be in the vicinity of the fire then).

E - Incorrect.
same error as option A.
_________________

For more info on GMAT and MBA, follow us on @AskCrackVerbal

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 30 Apr 2017
Posts: 68
Re: The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Oct 2017, 16:34
No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it,


it means : Thomas was in the vicinity of the fire this morning

what is wrong with A?
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2015
Posts: 85
WE: Design (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2017, 23:57
I feel there is a catch. Fire started before the dawn in the morning .In the premise it is not stated that whether he went to the library before the fire started or not.it is just stated he went to the library in the morning(may be 12:01AM) . If he went to the library before the fire started he could not have seen the fire or it may be the other way also.I feel C is wrong
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1909
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2017, 23:26
1
1
Quote:
The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.

The main conclusion of the argument is that
(A) Thomas was in the vicinity of the fire this morning
(B) Thomas claimed not to have seen the fire
(C) Thomas saw the fire this morning
(D) Thomas went directly from his apartment to the library this morning
(E) Thomas went by the Municipal Building this morning

pkm9995109794 wrote:
I feel there is a catch. Fire started before the dawn in the morning .In the premise it is not stated that whether he went to the library before the fire started or not.it is just stated he went to the library in the morning(may be 12:01AM) . If he went to the library before the fire started he could not have seen the fire or it may be the other way also.I feel C is wrong

Yes, this is technically possible, but since we are not asked about assumptions or ways to weaken the argument, this scenario is irrelevant. We are not looking for flaws in the author's argument. Rather, we are simply looking for the author's conclusion. According to the author's reasoning, Thomas saw the fire this morning, so the answer is (C).

soodia wrote:
what is wrong with A?

As for choice (A), the author does reason that Thomas was in the vicinity of the fire this morning. But the author uses that reasoning to SUPPORT the main conclusion, which is that Thomas saw the fire. Thomas admits to walking past the Municipal Building but claims that he did not see the fire. The author concludes that Thomas DID see the fire. Whether Thomas was in the vicinity of the fire is not in question.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Re: The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi &nbs [#permalink] 05 Nov 2017, 23:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn thi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.