Answers are in
bold.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to:
a) Highlight the importance of the steel industry in the development of the American economy.
b) Demonstrate the superiority of the open-hearth process over the Bessemer process.
c) Discuss two important developments in the history of the American steel industry.d) Detail the process by which iron ore can be made into steel.
e) Argue that steel is a far superior metal to wrought or cast iron.
Explanation of question 1The passage starts with the first successful process of steel making. We immediately know that author would talk about steel making in the passage and that would be the central theme. Lets go through the choices -
A - Author does not HIGHLIGHT the importance, he only talks about the 2 processes.
B - It is true that the open-hearth is a superior process, but it is NOT the main purpose of the passage as we discussed in the summary.
C - Yes, this is the main purpose. Author starts with describing the first process - Bessemer. Then he moved to open-hearth, giving his reasons why the world chose one over the other.
D - 2process are described. Also it does not detail the process by which iron can be made into steel. Literally one line - pass hot air over molten iron, that is only mentioned. That is definitely NOT detailing!
E - He is not arguing, end of argument!!

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. According to the passage, which of the following indicates a difference between iron and steel?
a) Iron is too expensive to produce to be a viable replacement for steel.
b) Steel is more carbon-rich than iron.
c) Iron is too brittle to be used for anything other than cutlery and some tools.
d) Steel can be produced from more phosphorous ores than can iron.
e) Iron contains carbon in higher amounts than steel does.Explanation of question 2This is a pretty straight forward question, we just need to find out where this is mentioned in the passage. Passage states -
"In the mid-1850s, Bessemer and Kelly independently hit upon the idea of blowing a blast of air through molten iron, thus removing excess carbon that differentiates iron from steel" Look what happens here, we are blowing hot air over molten iron. This removes excess iron. Steel is formed. So the word
'excess' implies that iron has more carbons than steel. That is exactly what E is, and that is our answer. For the sake of completeness let us check the other choices too -
A - Not mentioned at all
B - Opposite answer
C - No mention of cutlery and tools, we cannot infer this from the passage
D - Distortion of meaning, Steel can be produced by one method (open-hearth) FROM iron. Iron is the raw-material from which steel is made.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. According to the passage, which of the following was an advantage of the open-hearth process over the Bessemer process?
a) It reduced the time necessary to create steel from ore and scrap metal.
b) It was able to produce higher volumes of steel.
c) It was able to make use of highly phosphoric ores.
d) It could work with a wider variety of raw materials.e) It could produce up to ten tons of steel per hour.
Explanation of question 3A - Open-hearth takes MORE time than Bessemer. This is an opposite answer, just to throw you of your game.
B - this is a distortion of meaning, the world used open-hearth process more with time, but this does not mean that it was able to produce higher volumes of steel. Out.
C - Well this is not mentioned. In the first paragraph it is only mentioned that the Bessemer process CANNOT make use of highly phosphoric ores, but we cannot imply that the Bessemer process CAN.
D - Yes, this is correct. The Bessemer process can use wider variety of raw-materials (ore). it is mentioned in the passage here -
"It could make use of scrap iron and all varieties of ore. "