Question Type: Author Agreement/InferenceQuestion stem: "The passage suggests that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?"
What This Question Type Demands:This is an
inference question asking for what the author would agree with based on passage content. Key requirements:
1.
Must be supported by passage evidence - not just plausible speculation
2.
Author's perspective - what the author believes/would believe, not what others think
3.
"Suggests" - can be implied, but must be a necessary/logical inference
4.
"Most likely" - we need the BEST supported option, even if multiple seem reasonable
Critical Strategy:- Look for direct statements or clear logical implications
- Avoid answers that go beyond passage scope
- Avoid answers that contradict passage language (certainty vs. uncertainty)
- The correct answer often connects to the author's explicit commentary or conclusions
ANSWER CHOICE ANALYSIS(A) ❌ "The simpler the organism, the greater the speed at which it develops from fertilized egg to embryo."Passage Evidence:- Lines 20-23: Fruit fly makes egg in a week, but "once that well-appointed egg is fertilized, it is transformed from a single cell into a crawling larva in a day"
- Lines 24-35: Nematode development described, but
no timeline given- Lines 39-42: Mammalian embryos have "many stages of cell division" before polarity established
Analysis:- We have ONE example of fast development (fruit fly: 1 day from fertilization to larva)
- We have ZERO comparative data for nematodes
- We have VAGUE information for mammals (many stages, but no timeframe)
- The passage discusses polarity establishment timing, NOT overall development speed
Fatal Flaw: This overgeneralizes from a single data point. The passage provides
no systematic comparison of development speeds across different organism complexities. The fruit fly example shows speed AFTER fertilization, but the passage emphasizes it takes a week to MAKE the egg - so total process isn't necessarily faster.
Verdict: ❌ UNSUPPORTED - extrapolates beyond evidence
(B) ❌ "Scientists have determined how polarity is established in most simple vertebrates."Passage Evidence:- Lines 35-39: "A similar sperm-driven mechanism is
also thought to establish body orientation in
some comparatively simple vertebrates such as frogs, though apparently not in more complex vertebrates such as mammals."
Analysis - Word by Word:"thought to" = hypothesis/theory, NOT determination/proven fact
- This signals
UNCERTAINTY, not established knowledge
- Scientists think this might be how it works, but haven't definitively determined it
"some" ≠ "most"- "Some simple vertebrates" is explicitly
LIMITED scope- "Most simple vertebrates" would require evidence about the majority
- The passage gives ONE example: frogs
Fatal Flaw: The answer choice claims
CERTAINTY ("determined") where passage shows
UNCERTAINTY ("thought to"), and claims
BREADTH ("most") where passage shows
LIMITATION ("some").
Verdict: ❌ WRONG - contradicts passage's language of uncertainty and limited scope
(C) ✅ "Scientists will try to determine how polarity is established in humans."Passage Evidence:- Lines 39-44: "Research indicates that in human and other mammalian embryos, polarity develops much later, as many stages of cell division occur with no apparent asymmetries among cells. Yet
how polarity is established in mammals is currently a tempting mystery to researchers."
Analysis:"tempting mystery" = something that attracts/draws interest
"to researchers" = specifically to scientists who investigate such questions
Logical Chain:1. EXPLICIT: The mechanism is unknown ("mystery")
2. EXPLICIT: It attracts researchers ("tempting")
3. IMPLIED: What do researchers do with tempting mysteries? They investigate them
4. CONCLUSION: Scientists will try to determine how this works
Why This Must Be True:- The author wouldn't call something "tempting to researchers" if believing researchers won't pursue it
- That would be contradictory - like saying "this dessert is tempting to hungry people who won't try to eat it"
- The phrase "tempting mystery to researchers"
NECESSARILY implies future investigation attemptsStrength of Support: STRONG - directly follows from author's explicit characterization
Verdict: ✅ CORRECT - logically necessary inference from explicit statement
(D) ❌ "Very few observations of embryonic development after polarity is established are generalizable to more than a single species."Passage Evidence:- Lines 45-51: "Once an embryo establishes polarity, it relies on sets of essential genes that are
remarkably similar among all life forms for elaboration of its parts. There is an
astonishing conservation of mechanism in this process: the genes that help make eyes in flies are similar to the genes that make eyes in mice or humans."
Analysis:This is the
OPPOSITE of what the passage says.
The passage explicitly states:- Mechanisms AFTER polarity are "remarkably similar among all life forms"
- There is "astonishing conservation of mechanism"
- Eye-formation genes are similar across flies, mice, and humans
"Very few observations... generalizable" directly contradicts
"remarkably similar among all life forms"Fatal Flaw: This reverses the passage's main point about post-polarity development. The entire thrust of lines 45-55 is that
MANY observations about post-polarity development
ARE generalizable across species - that's what makes it "astonishing" and creates the "paradox."
Verdict: ❌ WRONG - directly contradicts passage
(E) ❌ "Simpler organisms take longer to establish polarity than do more complex organisms."Passage Evidence:- Lines 15-23: Fruit fly - polarity established BEFORE fertilization (during egg formation, takes a week)
- Lines 24-35: Nematode - polarity begins establishing when sperm enters, then p-granules congregate
- Lines 39-44: Mammals - polarity develops "much later" after "many stages of cell division"
Analysis:Timeline comparison:- Fruit fly: Polarity pre-set during egg formation
- Nematode: Polarity begins at fertilization and develops during early divisions
- Mammals: Polarity develops after many cell divisions ("much later")
The passage indicates: More complex organisms (mammals) take
LONGER to establish polarity than simpler ones (fruit fly has it ready immediately at fertilization).
Fatal Flaw: This gets the relationship
BACKWARDS. The passage suggests mammals (complex) take longer than fruit flies (simple), not the reverse.
Verdict: ❌ WRONG - reverses the relationship shown in passage
SUMMARYAnswer Choice Breakdown:(A) ❌ Overgeneralizes from insufficient data
(B) ❌ Changes "thought to" → "determined" and "some" → "most"
(C) ✅ CORRECT Logical necessity from "tempting mystery to researchers"
(D) ❌ Directly contradicts "remarkably similar among all life forms"
(E) ❌ Reverses the actual relationship described
Only (C) is a necessary logical inference that the author must agree with based on explicit passage content.
Cityofthewind
Please explain question #2