Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 27 Mar 2017, 05:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 317
Location: Missouri, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2004, 11:22
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?
(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D)The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

_________________

Let's get it right!!!!

If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 89
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2004, 12:13
Chicken and egg thing, So it has to be E.
Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 689
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2004, 15:05
I would have definitely picked D but I can also see the logic behind E
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 317
Location: Missouri, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2004, 15:11
gayathri, could u explain that logic?? I was breaking my head for a long time and ended up simply going mad and not following a thing
_________________

Let's get it right!!!!

Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 689
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2004, 15:26
I am editing to make it more clear...

I agree with Oxon that it will be a chicken & egg problem. You can only tell who the other nominees are to the prospective nominee once the other nominees have given the consent. But what do you do with the first prospective nominee you approach. You cannot tell them who the other potential nominees are as they have not provided their consent yet.

Hope it makes sense if not PM me...

Last edited by gayathri on 21 Nov 2004, 20:23, edited 1 time in total.
21 Nov 2004, 15:26
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an 8 15 Aug 2008, 04:51
14 The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an 14 04 Jun 2008, 20:10
The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an 5 23 Dec 2007, 08:59
The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an 3 12 Jul 2007, 11:41
The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an 2 16 Jun 2007, 05:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by