The French biologist Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck (1744-1829) outlined a

Question

The French biologist Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck
(1744-1829) outlined a theory of evolutionary change
in 1809, 50 years before Darwin's  On the Origin of
Species.  Lamarck's basic idea was that organisms
  (5)   change in adapting to their environment and then pass
on to their offspring the new characteristics they have
acquired. Since then, Lamarck has been ridiculed for
presumably implying, for example, that giraffes
developed their long necks by stretching, generation
  (10)   after generation, toward the leaves of trees. Most
modem biologists are adamant that nothing of the
sort occurs, ever. But the molecular immunologist
Edward J. Steele is attempting to revive Lamarckism:
he and his colleagues claim to have found evidence
  (15)   for a Lamarckian hereditary mechanism in the
immune system.

The immune system is an evolutionary puzzle in
its own right: How is it that our bodies can quickly
respond to so many different kinds of attacks? Is all this
  (20)   information in the genes? If so, then how does our
immune system defend against new diseases? Part of
the answer comes from the fact that some immune
system cells contain genes that mutate with unusual
frequency. The most common type of mutation is a
  (25)   sort of genetic “typo" that occurs when a cell’s DNA
is transcribed into RNA, the molecule that helps to
assemble proteins. These mutations allow the immune
system to test our different defenses until it finds one
that does the job.

(30)   Steele hypothesizes that the altered RNA then
reverts back into DNA. Indeed, such “reverse
transcription” of RNA back into DNA has been
observed frequently in other contexts. But the
troublesome question for Lamarckians is this: Could
  (35)   this new DNA then be carried to the reproductive
genes (in the sperm and egg cells), replace the original
DNA there, and so be passed on to an organism's
offspring? Steele and company believe this is possible,
and they have devised an elegant, but speculative,
  (40)   story to describe how it might happen using known
biological mechanisms. They believe a virus could
carry the altered DNA to the reproductive cells and
replace the DNA in those cells.

But even if the process Steele and his colleagues
  (45)   describe is possible, does it ever actually occur?
Evolutionary mechanisms are never observed directly,
so we must make do with circumstantial evidence.
Steele and his colleagues claim to have found such
evidence, namely a “signature” of past events that is
  (50)   “written all over” the genes that carry instructions for
immune system responses. They claim that a distinct
pattern of mutations concentrated in particular areas of
these genes “strongly suggests” that, in the past,
information has been transferred into DNA in the
  (55)   reproductive organs. Other biologists are not so
easily swayed. They suggest there may be other, less
radical explanations for the pattern of mutations that
Steele cites.    1 
 1. Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of the passage?

(A) The long-drided Lamarckian theory that organisms can pass on acquired characteristics to their offspring has been proven correct by the discoveries of Steele and his colleagues regarding the immune system. 
(B) Steele and his colleagues have devised an account of a mechanism by which acquired characteristics could be passed on to an organism's offspring, and they claim to have found evidence for the operation of this Larnarckian mechanism. 
(C) Although Steele and his colleagues have succeeded in showing that changes that occur in the immune system can be passed on to offspring, it is unlikely that a similar mechanism operates elsewhere in the body. 
(D) In contrast to the standard theory of evolution, the claims of Steele and his colleagues that organisms can pass on acquired characteristics to their offspring are highly speculative and rest on purely circumstantial evidence. 
(E) By showing that RNA can revert back into DNA, Steele and his colleagues have removed the main obstacle to general acceptance of the Lainarckian hypothesis that organisms can pass on acquired characteristics to their offspring.

2 
 2. The author most likely calls a certain kind of mutation a "typo" (line 25) primarily in order to

(A) distinguish it from mutations that are adaptive 
(B) characterize it as relatively inconsequential 
(C) indicate that it is an instance of imperfect copying 
(D) emphasize that it is easily overlooked 
(E) suggest an analogy between scientific investigation and textual analysis

3 
 3. The passage most strongly suggests that the author has which one of the following attitudes toward the theory proposed by Steele and his colleagues?

(A) confidence in its truth 
(B) indignation at its divergence from Darwinism
(C) distrust of its novelty
(D) doubt concerning its plausibility
(E) dismay at its lack of rigor

4 
 4. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) offering a historical account of the development of an evolutionary theory
(B) describing the efforts of a modem biologist to vindicate a long-disregarded evolutionary theory
(C) answering a set of questions about the immune system in light of evolutionary theory
(D) evaluating the overall merits of an evolutionary theory that has been rejected by most modem biologists
(E) presenting a discredited evolutionary theory as a case study in the philosophy of science

5 
 5. What is the primary function of the last paragraph in the structure of the passage as a whole?

(A) to present various objections that have been raised against the neo-Lamarckian theory outlined in the preceding paragraphs
(B) to dismiss the neo-Lamarckian theory outlined in the preceding paragraphs as not being supported by evidence
(C) to explain how the neo-Lamarckian theory outlined in the preceding paragraphs could be revised to take new findings into account
(D) to suggest several possible directions for further research regarding the neo-Lamarckian theory outlined in the preceding paragraphs
(E) to indicate the nature of the evidence for the neo-Larnarckian theory outlined in the preceding paragraphs

6 
 6. The passage most strongly suggests that the author would agree with which one of the following statements?

(A) Contrary to the opinion of most modern biologists, certain acquired characteristics probably can be passed on from one generation to the next.
(B) Steele and his colleagues have not actually observed the process of reverse transcription in immune cells.
(C) The patterns of mutations concentrated in particular areas of genes that carry instructions for immune system responses indicate that the DNA in these genes has been altered by a virus.
(D) The passing on of acquired characteristics from one generation to the next, if it occurs at all, is probably confined to the immune system.
(E) Unless a hypothesis can be confirmed by direct observation, it should be regarded as speculation rather than as science.
 
 7 
 7. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the position attributed to Steele and his colleagues in the passage?

(A) Scientists have succeeded in altering the 13NA in reproductive cells of laboratory mice by introducing a virus carrying new DNA.
(B) The patterns of mutations found in the genes that carry instructions for immune system responses are also found in genes in the nervous system.
(C) The process by which the immune system tests out the efficacy of cellular mutations is one of random trial and error.
(D) Fossil remains show that giraffes gradually evolved with increasingly long necks.
(E) It is known that birds can pass on acquired immunities to their gestating chicks via the yolk sacs in their eggs.

8 
 8. Suppose a scholar believes that the surviving text of a classical Greek play contains alterations introduced into the original text by a copyist from a later era. Which one of the following pieces of evidence bearing upon the authenticity of the surviving text is most analogous to the kind of evidence mentioned in the last paragraph of this passage?

(A) a copy of the original, unaltered text discovered in a manuscript independently known to date from the classical period
(B) a letter in which the copyist admits to having altered the original text in question
(C) an allegation by one of the copyist's contemporaries that the copyist altered the original text
(D) an account dating from the playwright's time of a performance of the play that quotes a version of the text that differs from the surviving version
(E) vocabulary in the surviving text that is typical of the later era and not found in other texts dating from the classical period

RC Butler 2023  -  Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.   
Passage # 33 Date: 23-Feb-2023
 This question is a part of RC Butler 2023 .  Click here for Details

Source:   LSAT Official PrepTest 77   
 Difficulty Level:   700

ap2201 · Answer

Hi Sajjad,

This passage is riddled with typos, a few in names, others in time: it reads to me as "$0 years before Darwin's." Although trivial, it takes away the fun of attempting the passage. If it's not too much effort, could you pls correct it?

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Thank you for reporting, I found this passage in a scanned PDF format with no copyable text. I used OCR (Text recognition software) to detect text and then copied it here at GMAT Club. Hence errors are the shortcomings of the transition. I tried removing the error. Please let me know if you still find any.

Cheers

Sourav04 · Answer

How can I know the answer for each question that I attempted ?

Sajjad1994 · Answer

The OAs will be automatically revealed on Friday 24th of February 2023 08:00:04 PM Pacific Time

ap2201 · Answer

Thank you, but I think it still reads "Stecle" to me instead of Steele in 1st paragraph, last line and Lamarck's spelling in Que 1 - three references and three different spellings. Rest all is fine.

This is only to avoid making you think is "oh, who in god's name is this now?"

RahulJain293 · Answer

4. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) offering a historical account of the development of an evolutionary theory
(B) describing the efforts of a modem biologist to vindicate a long-disregarded evolutionary theory
(C) answering a set of questions about the immune system in light of evolutionary theory
(D) evaluating the overall merits of an evolutionary theory that has been rejected by most modem biologists
(E) presenting a discredited evolutionary theory as a case study in the philosophy of science

Sajjad1994  How do we conclude Steele was modem biologist? He was a molecular immunologist per line 10

Sajjad1994 · Answer

The passage states that Edward J. Steele is a molecular immunologist. Molecular immunology is a branch of biology that focuses on studying the molecular and cellular aspects of the immune system. By identifying Steele as a molecular immunologist, the passage indicates that he is actively engaged in the field of biology, specifically in the study of the immune system.

The passage mentions that Steele and his colleagues claim to have found evidence for a Lamarckian hereditary mechanism in the immune system. This indicates that Steele is actively involved in conducting research and collaborating with other scientists in his field. The fact that he has colleagues and is working on a specific scientific hypothesis suggests his active participation as a modern biologist.

The passage further states that Steele and his colleagues have devised a speculative story that explains how the Lamarckian hereditary mechanism might occur using known biological mechanisms. This implies that Steele is knowledgeable about current biological understanding and is integrating existing knowledge to propose a hypothesis. It indicates that he is familiar with the advancements and discoveries in the field, which is a characteristic of a modern biologist.

Overall, based on his field of study, involvement in research, collaboration with colleagues, and integration of current biological knowledge, we can conclude that Edward J. Steele is presented as a modern biologist in the passage.

Danush649 · Answer

Sajjad1994 
Hi Sajjad 
In the 7th question, in context to this "  But the
troublesome question for Lamarckians is this: Could
(35) this new DNA then be carried to the reproductive
genes (in the sperm and egg cells), replace the original
DNA there, and so be passed on to an organism's
offspring? Steele and company believe this is possible  ", Option E which states that DNA can be carried to the reproductive genes, via the example the  birds can pass on acquired immunities to their gestating chicks via the yolk sacs in their eggs
 . Wouldnt E strengthen the position held by steele.?

Solenja · Answer

any explanations for the last question stuck btw options D&E

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

8. Suppose a scholar believes that the surviving text of a classical Greek play contains alterations introduced into the original text by a copyist from a later era. Which one of the following pieces of evidence bearing upon the authenticity of the surviving text is most analogous to the kind of evidence mentioned in the last paragraph of this passage?

Difficulty Level:   700

Explanation

Treat this question similar to the way you would treat a Parallel question. The question asks for the answer that is most similar to the style of evidence discussed in the  final paragraph . According to the final paragraph, the evidence is circumstantial  (line 47) , bears a recognizable signature  (line 49) , and is concentrated within the particular areas under study  (line 52) . Thus, the evidence for copyist errors introduced at a later time should have these same features.

A. No.  This would be direct, rather than circumstantial, evidence.

B. No.  This would be direct, rather than circumstantial, evidence.

C. No.  While this is indirect hearsay evidence, this is not concentrated within the text itself. Instead, it is external.

D. No.  This evidence is external and not concentrated in the text itself.

E.  Yes.   The altered vocabulary is concentrated in the text itself, has a recognizable historical pattern, and is circumstantial.

Answer: E

dine5207 · Answer

Here are my two cents:

If you read option E carefully it talks about passing of immunities to their chicks, but in the passage/ in your highlighted sentence " we are talking about the altering the DNA to reproductive cells & replace...". So, based on this you can eliminate option E.

Ayushi0002 · Answer

Can someone please explain the answer to the 6th question - I went for E in this case.

Sajjad1994 · Answer

This Inference question is asking for something with which the author would agree. Use the Bottom Line to eliminate contradictory answer choices. Conceptually, the credited response should sound like it was edited out of the same text from which this passage was excerpted. Trap answers may introduce new concepts not supported by the passage or they may go beyond the scope of the passage.

(B)  is correct. In  lines 30–33  the passage states that Steele hypothesizes that immune RNA can undergo reverse transcription and then follows by noting that reverse transcription has been viewed in other contexts. This supports the notion that reverse transcription has not yet been observed in immune cells.

E. No.  The author does not make any claims as to what differentiates speculation from science.

SamzayWarrior · Answer

Sajjad1994 
Hi Sajjad,
Can you please help me out with Q2? Which part of the text indicates the correct answer?

chetan2u · Answer

Hi
The lines succeeding the statement in question gives us clue to the answer.

So the mutations are not perfect copy but they undergo changes to make a copy that fits in to fight diseases.

Riya1475828 · Answer

Hi  Sajjad1994  can you please post the OAs for all the solutions.

Raman109 · Answer

2. The author most likely calls a certain kind of mutation a "typo" (line 25) primarily in order to

(A) distinguish it from mutations that are adaptive - "adaptation" in the context of "typo" is out of scope. 
(B) characterize it as relatively inconsequential - opposite. 
(C) indicate that it is an instance of imperfect copying - Yes. In an ideal scenario (DNA contains the overall blueprint of the cell's functioning, while "gene" is a subset of DNA as "gene" only contains the blueprints of "proteins"), the gene will create an exact copy when RNA (messenger) take the info from the gene, but sometimes because of imperfect copying of the gene blueprint "typos" the new mutations are created which are beneficial for immune cells particularly as they can try multiple gene blueprints or ammunition to fight against pathogen or virus attacks. Ok. 
(D) emphasize that it is easily overlooked - No. 
(E) suggest an analogy between scientific investigation and textual analysis - Yes, but it a more than this, just an analogy. It's mainly to describe the nature of the genetic mutation. Wrong.

Jaypembarthi · Answer

Can someone send explanation for all questions I didn’t understand

8Harshitsharma · Answer

I am a bit late in answering this, but hope that others can get some clarity.

The point that you are making is absolutely logical, and perhaps that's why in the final paragraph Steele and company have already claimed that they have observed such evidence of a parent passing the acquired immunity to his/her offspring, BUT other biologists are skeptical of the explanation provided by Steele and company. They believe that the whole "virus carries the altered DNA and replaces reproductive cell's DNA" story is RADICAL and actually some other less radical explanation must be there for this supposed evidence by Steele and company.

So choice E restates the evidence already doubted by the author in the final paragraph of the passage, and hence, doesn't affect anything.

Looking at answer choice A, it PROVES that the whole virus carries the altered DNA to and replaces the DNA in reproductive cells is indeed spotless, and hence, substantiates Steele and company's explanation.

The French biologist Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck (1744-1829) outlined a

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

The French biologist Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck (1744-1829) outlined a

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards