Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 22:26 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 22:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
parkhydel
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
20,387
 [53]
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 273
Kudos: 20,387
 [53]
Kudos
Add Kudos
52
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,293
 [3]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,293
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Apt0810
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2020
Posts: 327
Own Kudos:
622
 [3]
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 327
Kudos: 622
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
938
 [2]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. NO: The values of ACS doesn’t change as in proportion to river.

B. NO: The values of ACS doesn’t change as in proportion to FB

C: YES
A 100-year flood, for example, describes the level of floodwater expected to be equaled or exceeded once every 100 years.
 A 5-year flood, for example, describes the level of floodwater expected to be equaled or exceeded once every 5 years.
If a flood with a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (every 100 year) would be 20 times higher than if the same level needs to be compared every 5 years
Means now we have 20 times more value to compare about the same level

D. NO
inundated = covered with water
The frequency of flooding onto floodplains—the lands situated adjacent to rivers and other waterways—depends on factors such as climate, drainage area, channel slope, and the absorptive capacity of soil.

E: NO , The values of ACS doesn’t change as in proportion to SF
0.9-13
1.2-54
2.0-67
3.1 -8
5.5-3
12.7-16


2. Explicitly: clearly defined in Discussion ( means shouldnot be present in table discussion)
NO: In many regions, floods occur primarily during the snowmelt runoff season. + SF snowmelt floods mentioned in Table of Waterway Statistics
YES: such as climate, drainage area, channel slope, and the absorptive capacity of soil. + not defined in Table of Waterway Statistics
NO : such as climate, drainage area, channel slope, and the absorptive capacity of soil.+ discussed in table Table of Waterway Statistics


3.
Drainage area
J river: 330
P river: 210
It is true J area is more under flood plain boundary but nothing is mentioned about how people would be affected. It maybe possible that only few people affected along J river

NO

NO: no drains of one river into another river is mentioned

YES: Such a flood is also considered the 1% annual exceedance probability flood (i.e., a flood with a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year)
User avatar
DhruvBadaya
Joined: 27 Feb 2024
Last visit: 01 May 2025
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
40
 [3]
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
Posts: 57
Kudos: 40
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Note to self: Read the questions twice and slowly. The first reading should be fast, the second slow.­
User avatar
Arpitamitra
Joined: 30 May 2020
Last visit: 28 Oct 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92
Products:
Posts: 13
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question 2, Part 3: Drainage Area - "depends on factors such as climate, drainage area, channel slope, and the absorptive capacity of soil." this is explicitly mentioned in Discussion. Why is answer No for Drainage area then. Sajjad1994, please help.­
User avatar
Vishrut16
Joined: 21 May 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 3
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In question 3 we are asked if the info indicate the given statement but that's not a rigid question, once before a question with similar language asked if information support but since info wasn't rigid i marked otherwise and it was incorrect so how do i keep my approach when language is confusing??

If i go by what i learned before q3p1 shall be correct.
User avatar
riri3026
Joined: 28 Apr 2024
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 21
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So for q3, if the question asked us to infer- A 100-year flood on the Jackson River would directly affect more people than would such a flood on the Porter River.
Then our answer would have been yes but since they have asked us to only answer on the basis of the information provided, then its No.
User avatar
nikitathegreat
Joined: 16 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 110
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Posts: 201
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. Which one of the following can be most logically inferred from the information given?

Option D - The larger a waterway’s drainage area, the more frequently its floodplain becomes inundated.

Can we refer to the column to SF% to understand how frequently its floodplain become inundated? In that scenario. the answer will be yes since higher the drainage area, the more SF% except for 2 values.

karishma GMATNinja - Can you please help me with this.

Thanks
User avatar
asbhd
Joined: 16 Jul 2025
Last visit: 19 Aug 2025
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[color=#683d3d]KarishmaB[/color] Bunuel
For Q1 Option B; Don't we find the correlation by tracking the movement of the the two quantities relative to each other.
If we check ACS & FBM, they move in the same "direction" 3 out of 5 times, and 2 times in opposite direction. So, isnt the "general trend" of a positive correlation?

I think this concept has been used to solve so many tables analysis question on correlations. Could you please clarify
User avatar
cheshire
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 26 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 271
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 271
Kudos: 256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sure it's technically correlation but it's extremely weak and is closer to no correlation and just randomness than a strong correlation. Had they moved in the same direction 5/5 or even 4/5 times it would be arguable but 3/5 is too inconsistent for this sample size.
asbhd
[color=#683d3d]KarishmaB[/color] Bunuel
For Q1 Option B; Don't we find the correlation by tracking the movement of the the two quantities relative to each other.
If we check ACS & FBM, they move in the same "direction" 3 out of 5 times, and 2 times in opposite direction. So, isnt the "general trend" of a positive correlation?

I think this concept has been used to solve so many tables analysis question on correlations. Could you please clarify
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts