Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
50%
(01:37)
correct 50%
(01:37)
wrong
based on 169
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The government’s tax-reform package passed at the end of 2017 by Congress and reduced corporate-tax rates, making capital investment more attractive and cutting the incentive for domestic multinationals to hoard cash overseas.
A. package passed at the end of 2017 by Congress and reduced corporate-tax rates, making capital investment more attractive and cutting
B. package, passed at the end of 2017 by Congress, reduced corporate-tax rates, made capital investment more attractive, and cut
C. package was passed at the end of 2017 by Congress, reducing corporate-tax rates, making capital investment more attractive, and cutting
D. package, passed at the end of 2017 by Congress, reduced corporate-tax rates and made capital investment more attractive, cutting
E. package, which was passed at the end of 2017 by Congress, reduced corporate-tax rates, making capital investment more attractive and cutting
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The answer is E. A. package passed at the end of 2017 by Congress and reduced corporate-tax rates, making capital investment more attractive and cutting..... passed and reduced are made parallel which doesn't logically justify
B. package, passed at the end of 2017 by Congress, reduced corporate-tax rates, made capital investment more attractive, and cut - parallel elements again is illogical
C. package was passed at the end of 2017 by Congress, reducing corporate-tax rates, making capital investment more attractive, and cutting - was passed reducing? Instead the package reduced the ...
D. package, passed at the end of 2017 by Congress, reduced corporate-tax rates and made capital investment more attractive, reduced corporate taxes cutting incentives? It was reduced corporate taxes that made investment more attractive
E. package, which was passed at the end of 2017 by Congress, reduced corporate-tax rates, making capital investment more attractive and cutting - all the modifiers and meaning issues are aptly solved. which is non essential while making and cutting correctly refer to taxes rates.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.