Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
02 Apr 2022, 02:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
Dropdown 1: 60%
Dropdown 2: cannot be determined
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
39% (01:55) correct
61%
(03:32)
wrong
based on 44
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Use the dropdown menus to complete the statements accurately, using the information provided in the diagram.
1. Between 06-01-2007 and 08-01-2007, the per-inch increase in rainfall caused an average reduction of approximately in particulate.
2. One can expect with reasonable certainty that for 4 inches of rain, the particulate will be approximately parts per million.
Attachment:
Graphics.jpg [ 40.39 KiB | Viewed 3302 times ]
Kudos for best explanation!!
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Dropdown 1: 60%
Dropdown 2: cannot be determined
04 May 2024, 01:01
Kudos
Bookmarks
khmnasser
Because we cannot find a direct relation between the two line graphs. There seems to be no consistent pattern that could explain the particulate spikes.
Consider the period between 03-01-2007 & 06-01-2007, the inches of rain are fairly around 5.5 inches, yet the particulate ppm is no consistent enough to draw any conclusion.
