Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling to stay on time during Multi-Source Reasoning (MSR) questions on the GMAT? In this video, GMAT expert Karishma Bansal (founder of ANA Prep) breaks down a 3-minute scanning strategy that can help you save critical time...
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Wondering how to craft compelling Career goals for your "Why MBA" essay? In this video, Gunjan Jhunjhunwala, seasoned MBA expert at The Red Pen, will walk you through how to: Define clear short-term and long-term goals, and more.
Stuck at a score plateau and struggling to hit your target score? Join this Masterclass to understand how you should turn around your prep to reach your goal in just 40 days. Discover what top scorers know that you don’t!
Join us in a live GMAT Verbal practice session to solve 10 tough questions from the Reading Comprehension section tested in the GMAT Verbal section. Take this quiz with other test takers in timed conditions.
In our second video about test accommodations for the GMAT exam, GMAT Ninja’s founder chats with Jason Northrup, Test Accommodations Senior manager at GMAC, about the three main qualifying condition categories...
More Target Test Prep students are earning 100th percentile GMAT scores. Don’t settle for less when the Target Test Prep course gives you everything you need to score high on the GMAT. Start your 5-day free trial today.
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors..
For the year 1994, I took the user expenditure for Fungicides as 1500, Insecticides as 4000 and Herbicides and plant growth as 10000 which comes down to the total 15500.
1. Let's calculate the percentage growth for each pesticide type:
- Herbicides & PGR went from (7300 - 3100) = 4200 to (12400 - 6600) = 5800, which is a percentage growth of \(\frac{5800 - 4200}{4200} * 100\% \approx 38.1\%\). - Insecticides went from (3100 - 1150) = 1950 to (6600 - 2200) = 4400, which is a percentage growth of \(\frac{4400 - 1950}{1950} * 100\% \approx 125.6\%\). - Fungicides and Other went from (1150 - 0) = 1150 to (2200 - 0) = 2200, which is a percentage growth of \(\frac{2200 - 1150}{1150} * 100\% \approx 91.3\%\).
So, Insecticides experienced the most growth.
2. To find out how much insecticides accounted for total expenditures in 1994, we first have to find the total expenditures. This is the top of the graph if we draw a vertical at the year 1994 - 10000. Now, the difference between the intersections of the same vertical with top and bottom of the gray area, or 4050 - 1400 = 2650. The percentage will be \(\frac{2650}{10000} * 100\% = 26.5\%\).
3. Our answer will be: D1 - Insecticides and D2 - "between 25% and 30%".
Thank you so much for providing a detailed analysis of this problem. Somehow, I got the answer correct. But now I realize that my approach is completely wrong. Thank you!
Bismuth83
1. Let's calculate the percentage growth for each pesticide type:
- Herbicides & PGR went from (7300 - 3100) = 4200 to (12400 - 6600) = 5800, which is a percentage growth of \(\frac{5800 - 4200}{4200} * 100\% \approx 38.1\%\). - Insecticides went from (3100 - 1150) = 1950 to (6600 - 2200) = 4400, which is a percentage growth of \(\frac{4400 - 1950}{1950} * 100\% \approx 125.6\%\). - Fungicides and Other went from (1150 - 0) = 1150 to (2200 - 0) = 2200, which is a percentage growth of \(\frac{2200 - 1150}{1150} * 100\% \approx 91.3\%\).
So, Insecticides experienced the most growth.
2. To find out how much insecticides accounted for total expenditures in 1994, we first have to find the total expenditures. This is the top of the graph if we draw a vertical at the year 1994 - 10000. Now, the difference between the intersections of the same vertical with top and bottom of the gray area, or 4050 - 1400 = 2650. The percentage will be \(\frac{2650}{10000} * 100\% = 26.5\%\).
3. Our answer will be: D1 - Insecticides and D2 - "between 25% and 30%".