Jun 18 09:00 PM EDT  10:00 PM EDT Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Tuesday, June 18th at 9 pm ET Jun 18 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Send along your receipt from another course or book to info@empowergmat.com and EMPOWERgmat will give you 50% off the first month of access OR $50 off the 3 Month Plan Only available to new students Ends: June 18th Jun 19 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Jun 22 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jun 23 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

VP
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1246
GPA: 3.77

The late Japanese mathematician Shizuo Kakutani developed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2011, 00:42
Question Stats:
80% (01:13) correct 20% (01:27) wrong based on 184 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The late Japanese mathematician Shizuo Kakutani developed mathematical tools used for disparate purposes including proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coinflipping, and the furthering of economists' understanding of supply and demand in a complex economy. A. proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coinflipping, and the furthering of B. proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coinflipping, and furthering C. proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coinflipping, and furthering D. completing the proof of the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coinflipping, and the furthering of E. the proof of existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coinflipping, and furthering
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
Posts: 165
WE 1: 4 yr IT

Re: mathematician Shizuo Kakutani
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2011, 02:26
C. parallelism using "the" and "ing"
_________________
this time, we play for keeps



Senior Manager
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 298

Re: mathematician Shizuo Kakutani
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2011, 08:13
proving ... describing ... , and furthering
only C has the above construction



Manager
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 209
Schools: UC Berkley, UCLA

Re: mathematician Shizuo Kakutani
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jan 2011, 11:23
Pkit wrote: The late Japanese mathematician Shizuo Kakutani developed mathematical tools used for disparate purposes including proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coinflipping, and the furthering of economists' understanding of supply and demand in a complex economy.
A. proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coinflipping, and the furthering of B. proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coinflipping, and furthering C. proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coinflipping, and furthering D. completing the proof of the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coinflipping, and the furthering of E. the proof of existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coinflipping, and furthering It makes sense that the answer is C. Parallelism is what is tested here. A and D are out b/c "the furthering of" is an awkward construction. B and E are out too b/c the verbs used have to be in a continuous construction  proving, describing and furthering. C constructs the sentence nicely by making those corrections and using the adverb "accurately" instead of trying to use the word "accurate" (in adjective form) to describe a verb. HTH
_________________
Thank you for your kudoses Everyone!!!
"It always seems impossible until its done." Nelson Mandela



Manager
Status: TIME FOR 700+
Joined: 06 Dec 2010
Posts: 192
Schools: Fuqua
WE 1: Research in Neurology
WE 2: MORE research in Neurology

Re: mathematician Shizuo Kakutani
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jan 2011, 10:58
C, as all 3 follow a parallel structure : Xing..., Ying..., Zing, also because the economists' view is possessive you are furthering their understanding and not furthering OF their understanding
_________________
Back to the grind, goal 700+



Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 106

Re: mathematician Shizuo Kakutani
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jan 2011, 13:34
C. proving, accurately describing and furthering are parallel.



Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1075
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

Re: mathematician Shizuo Kakutani
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jun 2011, 21:52
+1 C Simple gerunds can be parallel only with other simple gerunds. A simple gerund doesn't have "the" before it.
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/myirlogbookdiary133264.html GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Senior Manager
Status: 1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 492
Location: United States (FL)
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V29 GMAT 2: 590 Q35 V35 GMAT 3: 570 Q42 V28 GMAT 4: 610 Q44 V30
GPA: 3.45
WE: Accounting (Accounting)

Re: The late Japanese mathematician Shizuo Kakutani developed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Oct 2013, 14:37
Here is the Official Explanation. This showed up as a question of the day on October 10, 2013.
Answer C Here, the three items listed must be in parallel form. (A) uses "proving . . . description of . . . and the furthering of . . ." That sentence does not use parallel form since the first item ("proving") is a gerund without an article, while the second ("description") is a noun, and the third ("the furthering") is a gerund with an article. (C) correctly uses parallel form by using gerunds without articles for all three items "proving . . . describing . . . and furthering". (B) uses a gerund ("proving") without an article, a noun ("description"), and another gerund ("furthering") without an article. So (B) is not parallel. (D) uses two gerunds ("completing" and "describing") without an article and a gerund ("the furthering of") with an article. So (D) is not parallel. (E) uses a noun ("the proof") and gerunds ("describing" and "furthering") without articles. So, (E) is not parallel.



Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 558
Location: France
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)

Re: The late Japanese mathematician Shizuo Kakutani developed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Oct 2018, 08:15
The underlined portion includes part of a list, and each of the three items in the must be in parallel form. The sentence as written uses "proving ..., description of ..., and the furthering of ...." This list is not in parallel structure since the first item ("proving") is a gerund without an article, while the second ("description") is a noun, and the third ("the furthering") is a gerund with an article. Eliminate (A). With parallel list errors, it's often not possible to scan vertically and group the answers, so inspect each one. (B) uses a gerund ("proving") without an article, a noun ("description"), and another gerund ("furthering") without an article, so it is not parallel. (C) correctly uses parallel form by using gerunds without articles for all three items: "proving ..., describing ..., and furthering." It appears to be correct, but check the others. (D) uses two gerunds ("completing" and "describing") without an article and a gerund ("the furthering of") with an article. So (D) is not parallel. (E) uses a noun ("the proof") and gerunds ("describing" and "furthering") without articles. Therefore, (E) is not parallel. (C) is indeed correct.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…
There is perfect timing for everything and everyone. Never doubt, But Work on improving yourself, Keep the faith and Stay ready. When it’s finally your turn, It will all make sense.




Re: The late Japanese mathematician Shizuo Kakutani developed
[#permalink]
09 Oct 2018, 08:15






