Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 23:04 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 23:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
PTK
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Last visit: 06 Oct 2022
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
2,206
 [4]
Given Kudos: 622
Status:mission completed!
GPA: 3.77
Products:
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 2,206
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vinzycoolfire
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
Last visit: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
90
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
WE 1: 4 yr IT
Posts: 134
Kudos: 90
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dimitri92
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Last visit: 18 May 2019
Posts: 230
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Affiliations: SPG
Posts: 230
Kudos: 3,574
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mariyea
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Last visit: 06 Dec 2011
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Schools:UC Berkley, UCLA
Posts: 185
Kudos: 277
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pkit
The late Japanese mathematician Shizuo Kakutani developed mathematical tools used for disparate purposes including proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping, and the furthering of economists' understanding of supply and demand in a complex economy.

A. proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping, and the furthering of
B. proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurate description of random processes such as coin-flipping, and furthering
C. proving the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coin-flipping, and furthering
D. completing the proof of the existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coin-flipping, and the furthering of
E. the proof of existence of Nash equilibria, accurately describing random processes such as coin-flipping, and furthering
It makes sense that the answer is C.
Parallelism is what is tested here. A and D are out b/c "the furthering of" is an awkward construction. B and E are out too b/c the verbs used have to be in a continuous construction - proving, describing and furthering.
C constructs the sentence nicely by making those corrections and using the adverb "accurately" instead of trying to use the word "accurate" (in adjective form) to describe a verb.

HTH
User avatar
Wishbone
Joined: 06 Dec 2010
Last visit: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 55
Status:TIME FOR 700+
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Fuqua
WE 1: Research in Neurology
WE 2: MORE research in Neurology
Posts: 180
Kudos: 64
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C, as all 3 follow a parallel structure : X-ing..., Y-ing..., Z-ing,

also because the economists' view is possessive you are furthering their understanding and not furthering OF their understanding
User avatar
intcan
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Apr 2021
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 71
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C. proving, accurately describing and furthering are parallel.
User avatar
metallicafan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 759
Own Kudos:
4,406
 [2]
Given Kudos: 109
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Posts: 759
Kudos: 4,406
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 C

Simple gerunds can be parallel only with other simple gerunds.
A simple gerund doesn't have "the" before it.
User avatar
avohden
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Last visit: 14 Mar 2015
Posts: 406
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 630
Status:1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Location: United States (FL)
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 2: 610 Q44 V30
GMAT 3: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 4: 590 Q35 V35
GPA: 3.45
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
GMAT 4: 590 Q35 V35
Posts: 406
Kudos: 3,133
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is the Official Explanation. This showed up as a question of the day on October 10, 2013.

Answer C Here, the three items listed must be in parallel form. (A) uses "proving . . . description of . . . and the furthering of . . ." That sentence does not use parallel form since the first item ("proving") is a gerund without an article, while the second ("description") is a noun, and the third ("the furthering") is a gerund with an article. (C) correctly uses parallel form by using gerunds without articles for all three items "proving . . . describing . . . and furthering". (B) uses a gerund ("proving") without an article, a noun ("description"), and another gerund ("furthering") without an article. So (B) is not parallel. (D) uses two gerunds ("completing" and "describing") without an article and a gerund ("the furthering of") with an article. So (D) is not parallel. (E) uses a noun ("the proof") and gerunds ("describing" and "furthering") without articles. So, (E) is not parallel.
User avatar
Helium
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Last visit: 01 Jun 2020
Posts: 454
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 118
Location: France
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE:Consulting (Other)
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
Posts: 454
Kudos: 808
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The underlined portion includes part of a list, and each of the three items in the must be in parallel form. The sentence as written uses "proving ..., description of ..., and the furthering of ...." This list is not in parallel structure since the first item ("proving") is a gerund without an article, while the second ("description") is a noun, and the third ("the furthering") is a gerund with an article. Eliminate (A).

With parallel list errors, it's often not possible to scan vertically and group the answers, so inspect each one.

(B) uses a gerund ("proving") without an article, a noun ("description"), and another gerund ("furthering") without an article, so it is not parallel.

(C) correctly uses parallel form by using gerunds without articles for all three items: "proving ..., describing ..., and furthering." It appears to be correct, but check the others.

(D) uses two gerunds ("completing" and "describing") without an article and a gerund ("the furthering of") with an article. So (D) is not parallel.

(E) uses a noun ("the proof") and gerunds ("describing" and "furthering") without articles. Therefore, (E) is not parallel.

(C) is indeed correct.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts