GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Dec 2018, 09:37

In Progress:

Admit Calls from Ross Join Chat Room | McCombs Join Chat Room for Latest Updates


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Happy Christmas 20% Sale! Math Revolution All-In-One Products!

     December 20, 2018

     December 20, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    This is the most inexpensive and attractive price in the market. Get the course now!
  • Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

     December 22, 2018

     December 22, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.

The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 64
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Schools: Thunderbird '15
The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2011, 18:20
3
27
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (01:05) correct 36% (01:08) wrong based on 1177 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction against the hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client.

a) they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client
b) the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of an economic nature
c) they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the client
d) the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages further
e) immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economic damages
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Manhattan Prep Instructor
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 123
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2011, 22:41
12
6
As vivesomnium noted above, "they" is a problem in both A, C, and D-- the only plural antecedent in the sentence is "lawyers." Clearly ,the intended meaning of the sentence is *not* that lawyers should act or be saved from economic damages. Or you could say that there is potential to group the lawyers and judge together into a plural unit, rendering the pronoun ambiguous. In either case, knock those choices out.

B (and D) contain another issue, though. See that front-end split among the answer choices? "They should" and "the judge act" both appear twice.

That word, "should," might have triggered a red-flag in your head-- we're in the realm of SUBJUNCTIVES!

Remember there are certain words (we call them "bossy verbs") that require the subjunctive mood. Verbs that indicate desire, suggestions, orders, etc. fall into that "bossy verb" category and require the command subjunctive. To construct the command subjunctive, take the infinitive form and cross off the "to."

He demanded that she [strike]to[/strike] STOP the car.
She required that he [strike]to[/strike] START the class on time.
Carl should [strike]to[/strike] BE the best man at your wedding.

B and D incorrectly attempt to apply the command subjunctive! The verb (or verbal, here, since "arguing" has a modifier function not a working-verb function) is NOT a "bossy" verb. Arguing isn't pleasant, but it's a back-and-forth process, not a one-way request or order.

That only leaves E, which CORRECTLY uses the subjunctive "should BE" and unambiguously uses the pronoun "their" to refer back to "lawyers."

Hope this helps.
_________________


JP Park | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Los Angeles

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 229
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2011, 20:16
1
1
a. who is they? lawyers? Federal judges? Manufacturer? or Federal judges and manufacturer togther? use of 'they' is creating ambiguity here
b. judge is made the agent of action, moreover 'from suffering further damages of an economic nature ' is very wordy - 'damages of an econmic nature' means 'economic damages'- use of such convoluted language makes this option incorrect.
c. similar to a, wrong use of they. also further damages being suffered is wrong. If the damages are further (in future, more than current) than how can they be 'being suffered' right now. being is continuous form, and is used wrongly here.
d. prevent whom? ambiguous use of them.
e. use of their here has a clear antecedent- lawyers. correct option.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 85
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Schools: IIMA (M)
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V31
WE: Supply Chain Management (Military & Defense)
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2011, 03:35
parker wrote:
As vivesomnium noted above, "they" is a problem in both A, C, and D-- the only plural antecedent in the sentence is "lawyers." Clearly ,the intended meaning of the sentence is *not* that lawyers should act or be saved from economic damages. Or you could say that there is potential to group the lawyers and judge together into a plural unit, rendering the pronoun ambiguous. In either case, knock those choices out.

B (and D) contain another issue, though. See that front-end split among the answer choices? "They should" and "the judge act" both appear twice.

That word, "should," might have triggered a red-flag in your head-- we're in the realm of SUBJUNCTIVES!

Remember there are certain words (we call them "bossy verbs") that require the subjunctive mood. Verbs that indicate desire, suggestions, orders, etc. fall into that "bossy verb" category and require the command subjunctive. To construct the command subjunctive, take the infinitive form and cross off the "to."

He demanded that she [strike]to[/strike] STOP the car.
She required that he [strike]to[/strike] START the class on time.
Carl should [strike]to[/strike] BE the best man at your wedding.

B and D incorrectly attempt to apply the command subjunctive! The verb (or verbal, here, since "arguing" has a modifier function not a working-verb function) is NOT a "bossy" verb. Arguing isn't pleasant, but it's a back-and-forth process, not a one-way request or order.

That only leaves E, which CORRECTLY uses the subjunctive "should BE" and unambiguously uses the pronoun "their" to refer back to "lawyers."

Hope this helps.


this has helped...

i made 3-4 mistake earlier because of word "argue" and that construction.

i wll go e
_________________

lets start again

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 260
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2013, 22:14
1
kannn wrote:
The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction against the hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client.

a) they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client
b) the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of an economic nature
c) they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the client
d) the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages further
e) immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economic damages

What is wrong with B?


B changes the original meaning. It is suggesting that their could be other kind of damages as well. E is is the crystal clear answer.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 142
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT Date: 08-01-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2013, 23:07
How to know that " their" in option E is not referring to Hardware manufacture? Is there some rule? :?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 275
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2013, 23:31
HI Mountain,

It's not so much about a rule. But rather looking at a sentence logically and seeing what it could mean.

In this instance if you read E there is nothing to suggest (logically) that 'their' doesn't refer to lawyers.

In a correct sentence, you can guarantee no ambiguity.

James
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 142
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT Date: 08-01-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2013, 00:12
plumber250 wrote:
HI Mountain,

It's not so much about a rule. But rather looking at a sentence logically and seeing what it could mean.

In this instance if you read E there is nothing to suggest (logically) that 'their' doesn't refer to lawyers.

In a correct sentence, you can guarantee no ambiguity.

James



This really confuses me big time..... :( ...

In A and C- " they" is ambiguous and do not have clear antecedent but when it comes to " their" it need to be logically thought...

Anyways, thanks James... probably... more practice is required... :(
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 750
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2013, 00:27
Mountain14 wrote:


This really confuses me big time..... :( ...

In A and C- " they" is ambiguous and do not have clear antecedent but when it comes to " their" it need to be logically thought...

Anyways, thanks James... probably... more practice is required... :(


hi,

the problem is in meaning..it is not like they is ambiguous....
meaning of sentence is:

The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction against the hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client.

THE LAWYERS(plural)===>THESE PEOPLE ARE PRESEEING FEDERAL JUDGE(SINGULAR) to impose ....against HARDWARE MANUFACTURER(SINGULAR)...

LAWYER IS ARGUING that THEY should take action......==>according to meaning who are supposed to take action....obviously FEDERAL JUDGE...WHICH IS SINGULAR....but here THEY is written to represent federal judge....thats why option A is wrong.

in option C:
c) they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the client ===>..IN THIS again THEY Should represent federal judge...same error as A....SINGULAR PLURAL mismatch

IN OPTION E

e) immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economic damages===>in this case===>their clients===>whose clients are suffering ....IT IS THE LAWYERS client....and their is no other client....SINCE IT IS LAWYERS (PLURAL) CLIENT....hence THEIR (PLURAL PRONOUN)==>THIS IS CLEARLY REFERING TO LAWYERS..

hope its clear
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 367
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2014, 23:41
parker wrote:
As vivesomnium noted above, "they" is a problem in both A, C, and D-- the only plural antecedent in the sentence is "lawyers." Clearly ,the intended meaning of the sentence is *not* that lawyers should act or be saved from economic damages. Or you could say that there is potential to group the lawyers and judge together into a plural unit, rendering the pronoun ambiguous. In either case, knock those choices out.

B (and D) contain another issue, though. See that front-end split among the answer choices? "They should" and "the judge act" both appear twice.

That word, "should," might have triggered a red-flag in your head-- we're in the realm of SUBJUNCTIVES!

Remember there are certain words (we call them "bossy verbs") that require the subjunctive mood. Verbs that indicate desire, suggestions, orders, etc. fall into that "bossy verb" category and require the command subjunctive. To construct the command subjunctive, take the infinitive form and cross off the "to."

He demanded that she to STOP the car.
She required that he to START the class on time.
Carl should to BE the best man at your wedding.

B and D incorrectly attempt to apply the command subjunctive! The verb (or verbal, here, since "arguing" has a modifier function not a working-verb function) is NOT a "bossy" verb. Arguing isn't pleasant, but it's a back-and-forth process, not a one-way request or order.

That only leaves E, which CORRECTLY uses the subjunctive "should BE" and unambiguously uses the pronoun "their" to refer back to "lawyers."

Hope this helps.

Is there a list of moods that require the use of the subjunctive?
I thought that argue was one of them....
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4569
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2016, 22:19
The Command subjunctive is used when the verb indicates a desire, intention, command, recommendation, request, resolution, or advice. It is also used along with such words as advisable, better, desirable, directive, essential, fitting, imperative, important, necessary, urge, urgent and vital etc
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Sep 2015
Posts: 53
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.97
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Reviews Badge
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2016, 08:20
So I have just started my SC studying but why would the portion of the sentence after the comma not be considered a dangling modifier?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 24 Jun 2016
Posts: 280
GMAT 1: 770 Q60 V60
GPA: 4
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2016, 09:56
1
"They" is ambiguous.

"Argue" should not be followed by a subjunctive.

Only E is correct.
_________________

Are you aiming for a 700+ GMAT score and a top 10 MBA?
If you are, we should talk. I specialize in ambitious students.


$80/hour as of May 2018.


http://www.facebook.com/HanoiGMATtutor
HanoiGMATTutor@gmail.com

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Posts: 264
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2017, 23:36
I was confused between B and E, but I finally selected B, thinking that E looses the information by making an active voice to passive voice. Please help how to avoid this trap(where more focus should be on actual meaning and where more focus should be on wordiness)
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2946
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jan 2017, 06:16
1
AR15J wrote:
I was confused between B and E, but I finally selected B, thinking that E looses the information by making an active voice to passive voice. Please help how to avoid this trap(where more focus should be on actual meaning and where more focus should be on wordiness)


Sorry, your query is not clear - the preference for E over B is not because of wordiness or original meaning.

B is wrong not because of wordiness or meaning, but because of faulty use of subjunctive. The verb "argue" is not a bossy verb, and hence the use of subjunctive "judge act immediately " is wrong - it is a grammatical error.

(If there is only one grammatically correct option, you have to select the same, irrespective of whether it maintains the meaning of the original sentence. Nowhere in the official guide is it stated that the correct option should have the same meaning as the original sentence. In case there are more than one gramatically correct options, then select the one that adheres to the meaning of the original sentence.)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Posts: 264
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jan 2017, 07:55
sayantanc2k wrote:
AR15J wrote:
I was confused between B and E, but I finally selected B, thinking that E looses the information by making an active voice to passive voice. Please help how to avoid this trap(where more focus should be on actual meaning and where more focus should be on wordiness)


Sorry, your query is not clear - the preference for E over B is not because of wordiness or original meaning.

B is wrong not because of wordiness or meaning, but because of faulty use of subjunctive. The verb "argue" is not a bossy verb, and hence the use of subjunctive "judge act immediately " is wrong - it is a grammatical error.

(If there is only one grammatically correct option, you have to select the same, irrespective of whether it maintains the meaning of the original sentence. Nowhere in the official guide is it stated that the correct option should have the same meaning as the original sentence. In case there are more than one gramatically correct options, then select the one that adheres to the meaning of the original sentence.)



But your answer cleared my query for rejecting the wrong answer. :-D

1. I read one post in the discussion which also describes argue as bossy verb. However, I don't know what are the bossy verbs. I tried to search, but I did not understand anything except the sentence that imperative verbs are bossy verbs.

2. I know the usage of subjunctive verbs-- demand, dictate, insist, mandate, request, recommend, suggest stipulate(some are optional-- ask, beg, urge, prefer, desire, intend, order require).

But I have seen some posts on gmatclab, the post that sometimes subjunctive verbs does not act as subjunctive verbs.For instance--
A study conducted by researchers suggests that cat walk more in winter than in summer to keep its body warm. -- wrong

A study conducted by researchers suggests that cat walks more in winter than in summer to keep its body warm-- Correct

Because the study is not giving any suggestion so it should not be treated as subjunctive verb. Correct me if I am wrong.

I suggest him that he eat less to stay fit-- correct

2. I have read in one of your posts that two modifiers can not refer to the same noun if they are not connected by conjunction

The dog lying behind my house and black in color is sick. --correct

However,

A study conducted by researchers on cat suggests that.............

Modifier--on cat
and
conducted by researchers
modifies a study

But writing the below statement seems awkward to me, please help. I always struggle when same noun is modified by more than one modifier
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2946
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2017, 02:32
1
AR15J wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
AR15J wrote:
I was confused between B and E, but I finally selected B, thinking that E looses the information by making an active voice to passive voice. Please help how to avoid this trap(where more focus should be on actual meaning and where more focus should be on wordiness)


Sorry, your query is not clear - the preference for E over B is not because of wordiness or original meaning.

B is wrong not because of wordiness or meaning, but because of faulty use of subjunctive. The verb "argue" is not a bossy verb, and hence the use of subjunctive "judge act immediately " is wrong - it is a grammatical error.

(If there is only one grammatically correct option, you have to select the same, irrespective of whether it maintains the meaning of the original sentence. Nowhere in the official guide is it stated that the correct option should have the same meaning as the original sentence. In case there are more than one gramatically correct options, then select the one that adheres to the meaning of the original sentence.)



But your answer cleared my query for rejecting the wrong answer. :-D

1. I read one post in the discussion which also describes argue as bossy verb. However, I don't know what are the bossy verbs. I tried to search, but I did not understand anything except the sentence that imperative verbs are bossy verbs.

2. I know the usage of subjunctive verbs-- demand, dictate, insist, mandate, request, recommend, suggest stipulate(some are optional-- ask, beg, urge, prefer, desire, intend, order require).

But I have seen some posts on gmatclab, the post that sometimes subjunctive verbs does not act as subjunctive verbs.For instance--
A study conducted by researchers suggests that cat walk more in winter than in summer to keep its body warm. -- wrong

A study conducted by researchers suggests that cat walks more in winter than in summer to keep its body warm-- Correct

Because the study is not giving any suggestion so it should not be treated as subjunctive verb. Correct me if I am wrong.

I suggest him that he eat less to stay fit-- correct

2. I have read in one of your posts that two modifiers can not refer to the same noun if they are not connected by conjunction

The dog lying behind my house and black in color is sick. --correct

However,

A study conducted by researchers on cat suggests that.............

Modifier--on cat
and
conducted by researchers
modifies a study

But writing the below statement seems awkward to me, please help. I always struggle when same noun is modified by more than one modifier


1. The term "bossy" is used in Manhattan SC guide to explain which kind of verbs are suitable for use of command subjunctive.

2. Very well explained. ("suggest" may or may not be bossy).

3. This is an exception of modifier touch rule. Manhattan SC guide lists the exceptions. The first one is as follows:
A mission critical modifier (again seems to be a Manhattan-coined term) may come in between a modifer and the noun it refers to. The latter modifer then modifes the entire noun+ first modifer. So in this case the modifier "on cat" modifies "A study conducted by researchers ", not just " A study". ("conducted by researchers" as usual modifies the noun it touches, i.e. "A study").
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 10
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q50 V30
GMAT 2: 600 Q50 V30
GMAT 3: 600 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.4
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2017, 10:54
isn't option E omitting the doer of action??

i have read that words that provide context should not be omitted or added to the original sentence.
_________________

success is the best revenge

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4569
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2017, 23:49
Top Contributor
The doer of the action may not be mentioned in all passive voice sentences. For example, in a recent public rally, several slogans were raised against the Apex court. Here it is not mentioned who raised the slogans. Still, it is a complete sentence.
One more: Constitution demands that the wages be paid on skills rather than on gender, caste, color, or creed. Here there is no need to mention who pays the wages. Obviously, it is implied that wages are paid by those who employ the people.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 382
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE: Information Technology (Other)
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2018, 23:56
kannn wrote:
The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction against the hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client.

a) they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client
b) the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of an economic nature
c) they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the client
d) the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages further
e) immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economic damages


1. All nouns in the left part except "layers" are singular, so we can not have "they" or "them" in the second part -----> A,C,D are out.
2. In B "argue"is not a bossy word
It means that the correct one will be something like:
the judge acts
the judge to act (if it were not "that before")
And moreover: "should act" sounds like something that makes more logical sense.
----------
These verbs require the infinitive without "to". (bossy words).
Examples:
ask, demand, desire, prefer, recommend, require, recommendation, requirement, suggest, suggest, urge, mandate, request, order, propose
it is essential/important, necessary that
------------

So we have to stick with E (though it is passive, whatever)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose &nbs [#permalink] 27 Nov 2018, 23:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.