Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61385

The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jun 2015, 23:13
Question Stats:
75% (01:58) correct 25% (02:19) wrong based on 173 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is directly proportional to the square of the velocity with which the object is thrown. If an object thrown upward at 16 feet per second reaches a maximum height of 4 feet, with what velocity must the object be thrown upward to reach a maximum height of 9 feet? A. 12 feet per second B. 16 feet per second C. 18 feet per second D. 24 feet per second E. 48 feet per second Kudos for a correct solution.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Posts: 44
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jun 2015, 00:37
Is the answer D? Given that the Height is directly proportional to the square of the velocity, I created the following equation, plugged in the values and solved. H1/(V1)^2 = H2/(V2)^2



Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GPA: 3.1
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jun 2015, 01:01
The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is directly proportional to the square of the velocity with which the object is thrown. If an object thrown upward at 16 feet per second reaches a maximum height of 4 feet, with what speed must the object be thrown upward to reach a maximum height of 9 feet?
height(h) is directly proportional to square of the velocity(v). h directly proportional to \(v^2\) h=k\(v^2\) where k is a constant \(\frac{h}{v^2}\) = k from the above, we can derive below equations \(\frac{h1}{(v1)^2}\)= \(\frac{h2}{(v2)^2}\)
Substituting the values (h1=4,v1=16,h2=9) \(\frac{4}{16^2}\) = \(\frac{9}{(v2)^2}\) v2=24 feet per second
Ans:D



Retired Moderator
Joined: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 807
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Economics, Finance
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jun 2015, 05:25
Bunuel wrote: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is directly proportional to the square of the velocity with which the object is thrown. If an object thrown upward at 16 feet per second reaches a maximum height of 4 feet, with what speed must the object be thrown upward to reach a maximum height of 9 feet?
A. 12 feet per second B. 16 feet per second C. 18 feet per second D. 24 feet per second E. 48 feet per second
Kudos for a correct solution. v^2 is directly proportional to max height 16^2 is directly proportional to 4 256 is directly proportional to 4 >>> 256 / 4 = 64 >>> Now we are looking for max height of 9 >>> 9*64 = 576 (24^2 = 576) Therefore 24^2 is directly proportional to max height of 9 Answer D



Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 144
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Social Entrepreneurship
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jun 2015, 08:48
As per given information assume h1 = max height of object at first throw, v1=velocity of the object on first throw; h2 = max height of object at second throw, v2=velocity of the object on second throw H is proportional to velocity ^2 => h1/h2= (v1/v2)^2 => 4/9= (16/x)^2 => 2/3=16/x => x=24 Hence answer is D
Thanks,



Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2012
Posts: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29 GMAT 2: 660 Q45 V35 GMAT 3: 680 Q48 V35
GPA: 2.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jun 2015, 10:50
Height is proportional to the square of velocity
h = k * v^2 (k is the constant)
4 = k * 16 ^ 2
or, k = 4 / 16 ^2
now question asking what will be speed required to attain 9 feet
9 = 4/16^2 * v^2 (Putting the value of K)
or v^2 = 9 * 16^2 / 4
v = 3*16/2 (taking under root both sides)
v = 24 feet / sec
hence, answer is D



Queens MBA Thread Master
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 162
Concentration: Leadership, General Management

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jun 2015, 06:59
Bunuel wrote: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is directly proportional to the square of the velocity with which the object is thrown. If an object thrown upward at 16 feet per second reaches a maximum height of 4 feet, with what speed must the object be thrown upward to reach a maximum height of 9 feet?
A. 12 feet per second B. 16 feet per second C. 18 feet per second D. 24 feet per second E. 48 feet per second
Kudos for a correct solution. Height is directly proportional to square of Velocity H1 / H2 = (V1)^2 / (V2)^2 4/9 = 16^2 / x^2 Solving we get x = 24 Option D



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61385

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jun 2015, 05:10
Bunuel wrote: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is directly proportional to the square of the velocity with which the object is thrown. If an object thrown upward at 16 feet per second reaches a maximum height of 4 feet, with what speed must the object be thrown upward to reach a maximum height of 9 feet?
A. 12 feet per second B. 16 feet per second C. 18 feet per second D. 24 feet per second E. 48 feet per second
Kudos for a correct solution. MANHATTAN GMAT OFFICIAL SOLUTION:Typically with direct proportion problems, you will be given “before” and “after” values. Simply set up ratios to solve the problem. For example, \(\frac{y_1}{x_1}\) can be used for the “before” values and , \(\frac{y_2}{x_2}\) can be used for the “after” values. You then write, \(\frac{y_1}{x_1}=\frac{y_2}{x_2}\), since both ratios are equal to the same constant k. Finally, you solve for the unknowns. In the problem given above, be sure to note that the direct proportion is between the height and the square of the velocity, not the velocity itself. Therefore, write the proportion as \(\frac{h_1}{(v_1)^2}=\frac{h_2}{(v_2)^2}\). Substitute the known values h1 = 4, v1 = 16, and h2 = 9: \(\frac{4}{(16)^2}=\frac{9}{(v_2)^2}\) \(v_2=24\). The object must be thrown upward at 24 feet per second. Answer: D.
_________________



SVP
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1867

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jun 2015, 07:28
The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is directly proportional to the square of the velocity with which the object is thrown. If an object thrown upward at 16 feet per second reaches a maximum height of 4 feet, with what speed must the object be thrown upward to reach a maximum height of 9 feet? h = height, x = constant of proportionality, v = velocity First solve for the constant. xh=v^2. x(4)=16^2 => x = 64 Second solve for v. 64(9)=v^2 A. 12 feet per second B. 16 feet per second C. 18 feet per second D. 24 feet per second E. 48 feet per second



Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Posts: 10

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 21 Aug 2015, 10:18
Unitary method for directly/indirectly proportional problems:
Theory: Let the max. height reached by the object be \(h\). Let the velocity with which the object is thrown be \(v\). Given, \(h>v^2\).
Now, hmax= 4 when the object is thrown at the speed (velocity of the object) of \(16 ft/sec\). For \(h = 9\) the \(speed\) \(v^2 = ?\)
\(\frac{16*16*9}{4} = v^2\)
Ans: 24  D
Originally posted by PratikHP on 14 Aug 2015, 10:34.
Last edited by PratikHP on 21 Aug 2015, 10:18, edited 3 times in total.



Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2015
Posts: 110

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Aug 2015, 22:52
Bunuel wrote: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is directly proportional to the square of the velocity with which the object is thrown. If an object thrown upward at 16 feet per second reaches a maximum height of 4 feet, with what speed must the object be thrown upward to reach a maximum height of 9 feet?
A. 12 feet per second B. 16 feet per second C. 18 feet per second D. 24 feet per second E. 48 feet per second
Kudos for a correct solution. h =k*(v^2) 4=k*(16^2) k=1/64 9=(v^2)*(1/64) v^2 = 9*64 v=3*8=24 Hence, the correct option is D



Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2468
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2015, 18:22
i got to the answer choice by approximations 4 ft upwards = k * 16^2 or 256k = 4, out of which we can see that k is 1/64 now we have another equation: 9 ft = k * x (velocity) or 9 = x/64 x = 9*64 that is ~600. Which value of an integer is closer to this number? well, 25 squared is 625. It must be smth 20+ but less than 25 24 is thus the answer.



Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2017
Posts: 52
Location: India
GPA: 3.23

The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 07 Mar 2018, 01:13
Isn't the question ambiguous? Because it derives a corelation between height and velocity and asks us about the speed. We all know that speed and velocity are totally different terms.Am I correct? Bunuel please help ..
Originally posted by sahilsnpt on 07 Mar 2018, 00:51.
Last edited by sahilsnpt on 07 Mar 2018, 01:13, edited 1 time in total.



Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3551

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Mar 2018, 01:05
sahilsnpt wrote: Isn't the question ambiguous? Because derives a corelation between height and velocity and asks us about the speed. We all know that speed and velocity are totally different terms.Am I correct? Bunuel please help .. Hey sahilsnpt , Lol, I could see you are a Physics student. Yeah, it should be velocity. I have modified the original question. Thank you!
_________________
My LinkedIn abhimahna.My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40  My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA DreamMy Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub  Importance of an Error Log!Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place  All CR Resources at one placeBlog: Subscribe to Question of the Day BlogGMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality  View More. New Visa Forum  Ask all your Visa Related Questions  here. Have OPT questions?  Post them here. Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for freeCheck our new About Us Page here.



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14124

Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2020, 07:15
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: The maximum height reached by an object thrown directly upward is dire
[#permalink]
18 Jan 2020, 07:15






