GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Aug 2018, 08:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 479
Schools: Fuqua
The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2009, 21:34
17
88
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:03) correct 28% (01:13) wrong based on 4657 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

(A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
(B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
(C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of
Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 105
Re: A critique of all chemistry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2009, 22:39
5
1
I would like to go with A

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry davy ......................................................, a critique


Humphry davy is the Subject so critiquing can not come, eliminated D&E


A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a this actually changes the meaning
C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyke and envisioning as well not parallel

please correct me if im wrong
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 165
Re: A critique of all chemistry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Nov 2009, 10:39
2
A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
ROBERT BOYLE ISNOT A TIMEPERIOD THAT CAN BE USED TO COMPARE USING "SINCE"

B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
"FOLLOWING" BETTER CLARIFIES THE MEANING THAT SUCH A CRITIQUE WAS PROBABLY ALSO WRITTEN BY ROBERT BOYLE AND DAVY FOLLOWED THE SAME.
"VISION" AND "ENVISION" HAVE A DIFFERENCE(GOOGLE IT OUT).IM SURE,WE WILL
SEE THAT ENVISION IS A BETTER OPTION.
C,D,E ARE ALL JUNK
C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyke and envisioning as well
D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
E) critiquing akk the chemistring done since Robert Boyke as wekk as his own envisioning of
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 107
Location: USA
Schools: IU KSB
Re: A critique of all chemistry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2009, 07:56
2
1
mrsmarthi wrote:
The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry davy presented the results of his early experiments in his "Eassay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a His is ambiguous
C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyke and envisioning as well
D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
E) critiquing akk the chemistring done since Robert Boyke as wekk as his own envisioning of


Here second part is modifying "Essay"

Parallel construction a critic of as well as a vision of

I pick A
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2010
Posts: 89
Location: india
WE 1: 1.3
Reviews Badge
Re: A critique of all chemistry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2010, 06:12
2
1
guys just want to check if iam right my ans is A
the underlined part is a modifier for the book,thus it must be an adjective(a critique of...)whereas the opt d and e use critiqing which is a verb form and must modify humpry davy and not his book(as davy is critiqing through the book)
please tell me if iam right
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 433
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: A critique of all chemistry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2010, 06:25
sasen wrote:
A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
ROBERT BOYLE ISNOT A TIMEPERIOD THAT CAN BE USED TO COMPARE USING "SINCE"

B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
"FOLLOWING" BETTER CLARIFIES THE MEANING THAT SUCH A CRITIQUE WAS PROBABLY ALSO WRITTEN BY ROBERT BOYLE AND DAVY FOLLOWED THE SAME.
"VISION" AND "ENVISION" HAVE A DIFFERENCE(GOOGLE IT OUT).IM SURE,WE WILL
SEE THAT ENVISION IS A BETTER OPTION.
C,D,E ARE ALL JUNK
C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyke and envisioning as well
D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
E) critiquing akk the chemistring done since Robert Boyke as wekk as his own envisioning of

In B, what can 1 convey by saying "chemistry following a person"I find the idea a bit absurd .and envision is a verb i think.
Envisioning is a gerund .Can some 1 find his envisioning of something .Looking for opinions.
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4523
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A critique of all chemistry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2010, 07:45
Choice B gives an erroneous feeling that the critique is following Robert Boyle and Robert Boyle’s envisioning. Still more skeptics may say, ‘ his’ has no proper antecedent can mean either Boyles’ or Davy’s envisioning. It is safe to avoid it
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2011
Posts: 2
GMAT ToolKit User
The nineteenth-century chemist Davy presented th results of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2011, 17:53
The nineteenth-century chemist Davy presented th results of his early experiments in his "essay on Heat and Light", [highlight]a critique of all chemistry since Robert as well as a vision of a[/highlight] new checmistry.

This is marked as the correct answer, but since both these sentences are independent, shouldn't we try to make the second sentence dependent. So I thought it would be correct if it became

critiquing all checmistry done since Robert as well as his envisioning of ...
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4523
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: SC Question  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2011, 22:46
’a critique of all chemistry since Robert as well as a vision of a new chemistry.’ -- This part is not an independent clause . It is just an appositive modifier, describing Davy’s book. Please note the absence of a verb there, which is essential to mark it as a cluse.

The amended sentence ‘critiquing all chemistry done since Robert as well as his envisioning of’... cited by has the following flaws.
critiquing’ is a present participle while ‘his envisioning of’ is a gerund. Both are not parallel
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

SVP
SVP
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2227
Location: New York, NY
Re: SC Question  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2011, 13:56
2
Quote:
The nineteenth-century chemist Davy presented th results of his early experiments in his "essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert as well as a vision of a new checmistry.


Breaking this down, we have:

blah blah blah happened in his essay, a _____ as well as a ______.

That's the structure.
Make sure the structure makes sense.

blah blah blah happened in his essay, a critique as well as a a vision.

OK, looks ok so far.

Now does it make sense in its entirety.

blah blah blah happened in his essay, a critique of [old chemistry] as well as a vision of a [new chemistry].

So those are the keypoints to recognize. The structure works here. The keyword is "as well as" - so you have make sure things are consistent on both sides.

Hope that helps!
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 752
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A critique of all chemistry  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Dec 2011, 06:51
2
mundasingh123 wrote:
sasen wrote:
A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
ROBERT BOYLE ISNOT A TIMEPERIOD THAT CAN BE USED TO COMPARE USING "SINCE"

B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
"FOLLOWING" BETTER CLARIFIES THE MEANING THAT SUCH A CRITIQUE WAS PROBABLY ALSO WRITTEN BY ROBERT BOYLE AND DAVY FOLLOWED THE SAME.
"VISION" AND "ENVISION" HAVE A DIFFERENCE(GOOGLE IT OUT).IM SURE,WE WILL
SEE THAT ENVISION IS A BETTER OPTION.
C,D,E ARE ALL JUNK
C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyke and envisioning as well
D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
E) critiquing akk the chemistring done since Robert Boyke as wekk as his own envisioning of

In B, what can 1 convey by saying "chemistry following a person"I find the idea a bit absurd .and envision is a verb i think.
Envisioning is a gerund .Can some 1 find his envisioning of something .Looking for opinions.


Concrete noun cannot be paralleled with simple gerund. "envisioning" is gerund and not prefer as "vision". A is correct.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 54
Schools: NUS
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Dec 2011, 20:05
1
1
mrsmarthi wrote:
The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

(A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a ,since should refer to a time frame, it should be like Since robert boyle's time
(B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
(C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of

I went for E considering this flaw in option A as considering and envisioning(gerund) seems parallel and probably the best one
Correct me if i am wrong
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 145
Re: The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Dec 2012, 17:53
2
The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

(A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a. Correct. Since Robert Boyle means 'since time of Robert Boyle'. Its correct modifier of "Essay on Heat and Light"
(B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a his envisioning of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found' is awkward usage. 'Vision' is more correct usage.
(C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well 'and envisioning as well new chemistry that Davy hoped to found' becomes wrong English usage.
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of It modifies the whole sentence rather than just a book.
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of It modifies the whole sentence rather than just a book.

Main sentence in the question is 'Humphry Davy presented the results' and rest of the things are modifiers and clauses.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1075
Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2013, 15:42
5
The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

(A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
Correct parallelism. Other answers have parallelism problem.

(B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
(C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 185
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2014, 02:01
1
mrsmarthi wrote:
The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

(A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
(B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
(C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of



"Essay on Heat and Light" is a title, so we need an explanation of what this title refers to. In other words, we need a noun, not a verb. Thus, D/E gone.

A) "a critique of... as well as... a vision of" is parallel, so this sounds good

B) "following Robert Boyle" is ambiguous and distorts the intended meaning of the author. The chemistry is not following Robert, is it? "his envisioning" incorrectly refers to Boyle, instead of Davy. B gone

C) This option looks good up until the present participle envisioning. This messes up the parallel structure. Also "envisioning as well new chemistry" sounds weird, and does not preserve the intended meaning of the author. C gone

So we go with A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 268
The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2014, 18:07
The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

(A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
(B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
(C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of

SPOILER ALERT!

Without giving away the answer - i had narrowed it down to A & E (eliminated the rest b/c of parallelism).

My question is - what is the different between "Davy presented his essay, a critique..." vs. "Davy presented his essay, critiquing..." Can I choose an answer only based on these two things? There is a ton of ambiguity with E but my question still stands.

I used a semi-guess to choose A because I figured that "a critique" would modify the subject right before the comma and in this case, it was his essay. Is that poor reasoning?

Thanks!

Thanks a ton!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2014
Posts: 18
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Babson '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.8
Re: The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2014, 22:01
1
russ9 wrote:

My question is - what is the different between "Davy presented his essay, a critique..." vs. "Davy presented his essay, critiquing..." Can I choose an answer only based on these two things? There is a ton of ambiguity with E but my question still stands.

I used a semi-guess to choose A because I figured that "a critique" would modify the subject right before the comma and in this case, it was his essay. Is that poor reasoning?

Thanks!

Thanks a ton!


critiquing modifies the verb presented - he presented essay critiquing .......

a critique modifies the essay itself - essay was a critique for something. This is the intended meaning of this sentence, so you can easily make your decision based on this. Also parralelism required in the second part of the sentence - "the essay was a critique as well as a vision"
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2014
Posts: 1
Re: The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2014, 03:36
4
1
This is a "noun + noun modifier" construction and we have two modifiers which should modify the same noun. They are:
(1) a critique of all chemistry
(2) a vision of a new chemistry
Also, remember that we should retain the meaning of original sentence unless the original sentence is senseless.

Let's analyze the options one by one.

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

(A ) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a

Both the modifiers modify noun "Essay" and are parallel to each other, hence CORRECT.


(B ) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a

(1) The first modifier "a critique of all chemistry" is a "noun+noun modifier" construction but the second part "his envisioning of a" is a
Complex gerund. A complex gerund could be made parallel to only complex gerunds and action nouns. But here "a Critique" is not
an action noun. So they cannot be made parallel to each other.
Note: "His" in "his envisioning" is a possessive determiner here. So his envisioning gives an impression that it is for "Essay".
(2) "and" and "also" are redundant.



(C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well

Same as above. Also, "and" and "as well" are redundant


(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of

"critiquing " is a present participle and modifies the subject(Humphry Davy) of the previous clause which is not the intent of the sentence.


(E )critiquing all the chemistrydone since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of
Now you can try this yourself.
_________________

People don't fail, they just give up. Never give up!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 268
Re: The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2014, 13:35
2
1
ershovici wrote:
russ9 wrote:

My question is - what is the different between "Davy presented his essay, a critique..." vs. "Davy presented his essay, critiquing..." Can I choose an answer only based on these two things? There is a ton of ambiguity with E but my question still stands.

I used a semi-guess to choose A because I figured that "a critique" would modify the subject right before the comma and in this case, it was his essay. Is that poor reasoning?

Thanks!

Thanks a ton!


critiquing modifies the verb presented - he presented essay critiquing .......

a critique modifies the essay itself - essay was a critique for something. This is the intended meaning of this sentence, so you can easily make your decision based on this. Also parralelism required in the second part of the sentence - "the essay was a critique as well as a vision"


Well, A and E are both parallel so that's not the issue. I see what you're trying to say but I would challenge that:

- In A/B/C/ Is it safe to say that whenever we have a sentence followed by a , noun can we infer that the first word is going to modify the noun before the comma? What I mean is -- can we say that the book was a "critique" since the book isn't alive, it can't be actively critiquing. Does my question make sense to anyone?

- Why is E wrong even if it's modifying the whole prior clause? "HD experiments were presented in a book" - "critiquing..." ...doesn't all that still make sense?

Any experts care to jump in?

Thanks!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 189
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2014, 01:03
1
Since Robert is better than "following", "after", or "from" Robert.
A and E is left.
in E, Davy critiqued his own envisioning is confused and "done" is redundant
Nothing is wrong with A, so A is the answer
_________________

.........................................................................
+1 Kudos please, if you like my post

Re: The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the &nbs [#permalink] 18 Jul 2014, 01:03

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 31 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.