The notion of the Great Plains as a vast roaming ground for cowboys an

Question

Aristotle RC 99 - Passage 20     
   The notion of the Great Plains as a vast roaming ground for cowboys and their herds of cattle became popular more recently than some might think. Let us first put aside that now cliché notion of a lawless Wild West with gunslingers and bandits running rampant and shootouts in front of salons every day at high noon. To be sure the west was a dangerous place, but the vast majority of the mystique surrounding the times and places comes more from East Coast writers and later imaginations than anything else. The image of a Great Plains populated by cattle herds and homesteaders was slow to emerge. Much of the settling of the West happened in land grabs after the Civil War. 
 
In spite of the conventional interpretation, a survey of source material reveals that the image of the plains as Desert was restricted in 1825 to certain portions of the country and to certain segments of the population. Analysis of newspapers and periodical literature indicates that the Desert image was strongest in the rural areas of the Northeast and weakest in the rural areas of the South and trans-Appalachian West. Acceptance of the Desert concept was more likely among the well-educated elite, particularly in the Northeast, and acceptance of a ―Garden‖ notion was greater among the rural populations, particularly in the South and West. 
 
American historians have argued that the myth of the Great American Desert dominated the pre-Civil War view of the Great Plains. It was this conception of the plains as Desert, according to the traditional interpretation, that caused the American folk migration westward to leap over the region during the 1840‘s and the 1850‘s. This conventional understanding is neither completely invalid nor necessarily incorrect; but it is too simplistic to be fully satisfying. To claim the universal acceptance of stereotyped images of the Great Plains is to ignore the presence of a considerable array of data to the contrary. 
 
By the middle of the 1840‘s, the concept of the plains as Desert had become prevalent, but even then the Desert image was not the exclusive one. The year 1845 is critical, for it marked the beginning of the migration of Americans across the Plains to Oregon and California. An examination of the sources of American images of the plains in that year does not support the contention that the folk migration failed to halt on the Great Plains because that region was viewed unfavourably by the migrants. By 1845 the American frontier was bursting with what one Missouri newspaper editor called ―perfect Oregon fever.‖ But those who encouraged migration to Oregon did not deny the agricultural potential of the Plains. They simply made Oregon the logical and desirable culmination of the American drive to the Pacific. 
 
This notion of Manifest Destiny was so pervasive during that time. It was considered by most Americans to be not merely a right, but a duty to settle the continent from shore to shore, plowing through the middle of the country to reach the inevitable destination. To substantiate the point that the folk elements of American society did not see the plains as Desert, one need only look at the records of those who crossed the Plains on their way to Oregon or California. A survey of the diaries from the years preceding the Civil War uncovers only 17 references to Desert conditions in the Great Plains.   1 
 1. According to the information presented by the author in the passage, American migrants travelling throughout the United States in the mid-1840‘s often: 
  
A. doubted the economic potential of the Great Plains. 
B. had an overly optimistic image of the Great Plains. 
C. had geographical destinations other than the Great Plains. 
D. were misinformed by newspaper stories. 
E. faced threats from bandits 
 
  2 
 2. All of the following can be found in the author‘s argument about the Great Plains EXCEPT: 
  
A. a contrast between the views of Americans who lived in different regions. 
B. a comparison of written and oral accounts of the migration experience. 
C. a general description of people who believed the Great Plains to be a Desert. 
 D. an indication as to when westward migration activities increased in scope. 
E. a mention of the opinion of American historians 
 
 3  
 3. Which of the following best summarizes the author‘s attitude toward the traditional view as posed in the passage that most Americans regarded the Great Plains as Desert? 
  
A. It ignores conflicting evidence. 
B. It is irrelevant to historical understanding. 
C. It is substantially correct. 
D. Its importance has been unappreciated. 
E. It is absolutely absurd

RC Butler 2021  -  Practice Two RC Questions Everyday.   
Passage # 76 Date: 23-Feb-2021
 This question is a part of RC Butler 2021 .  Click here for Details

arya251294 · Answer

Can anyone please explain Q3 ? I chose option E as the answer.
I was confused between A & E but still can't see any reason to eliminate E.
Please help.

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Official Explanation

3. Which of the following best summarizes the author‘s attitude toward the traditional view as posed in the passage that most Americans regarded the Great Plains as Desert?

Difficulty Level:   700

Explanation

What is the author‘s opinion of the traditional view? Review  Paragraph 3 : the author doesn‘t say that the traditional view is completely wrong, and in fact takes pains to say that it‘s not ―completely invalid nor necessarily incorrect. The author believes that it‘s ―too simplistic‖ and ignores ―a considerable array of data to the contrary.  (A)  summarizes this neatly.

(A):  The correct answer

(B):  Opposite. This choice is far too negative in tone, and since the author says that the traditional view is not completely invalid, it must have some historical relevance.

(C):  Opposite. The author argues that it‘s too simplistic, which means that it can‘t be ―substantially correct.‖

(D):  Opposite. The author argues that the traditional view has been overhyped if anything and that a more nuanced historical analysis should take its place.

(E): "Absurd"  is extreme language

Answer: A

ravigupta2912 · Answer

Hello. Can someone post the official explanation for Q2?

I'm wondering if the description of people in Para 2 has been cited to suggest that choice C in Q2 is incorrect? I construed "description" as their ethnicity, etc. But the meaning ascribed was a little broad. In other words, I was having a tunnel view when i rejected B and went for C in Q2.

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Official Explanation

2. All of the following can be found in the author‘s argument about the Great Plains EXCEPT:

Difficulty Level:   650

Explanation

An unusual question in an ―All...EXCEPT format that asks you to evaluate the author‘s argument. A quick scan of the answer choices show that they focus on structure rather than particular details. Look for something that the author doesn‘t do:  (B)  fits the bill. The author never mentions oral accounts, and so there can be no comparison of them with something else.

(A): Opposite.  This is the subject of  paragraph 2.

(B):  The correct answer

(C): Opposite.  The author describes the type of person most likely to believe the desert myth at the end of  paragraph 2.

(D): Opposite.  The author mentions in  paragraph 4.  that the year 1845 marked the beginning of broad migration.

(E): Opposite.  This is mentioned in the  paragraph 3.

Answer: B

Simanta90 · Answer

official explanation for question 1 please ?

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Official Explanation

1. According to the information presented by the author in the passage, American migrants travelling throughout the United States in the mid-1840‘s often:

Difficulty Level:   700

Explanation

The mid-1840s are mentioned in  paras 3  and  4 . Review the author‘s basic points: Not everyone thought the plains were the desert, and many settlers simply passed the Plains up because they were on their way to Oregon.  (C)  reflects the latter point.

(A):  Opposite. The author states in the same lines that ―those who encouraged migration to Oregon did not deny the agricultural potential of the Plains. For the purpose of settling, agricultural potential in the Plains was presumably equivalent to economic potential.

(B):  Distortion. Though the author argues that settlers generally didn‘t have an overly pessimistic view of the Plains as a desert, there‘s no indication that their view skewed too far in the opposite direction.

(C):  The correct answer

(D):  Opposite. Newspapers are cited in para 2 as a data source for investigating the myth of the Great American Desert; the author argues that those who did accept the desert images were mainly the elite, who presumably weren‘t the main migratory population.

(E):  Bandits are not within the scope of the passage

Answer: C

VerbalBot · Answer

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

The notion of the Great Plains as a vast roaming ground for cowboys an

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

The notion of the Great Plains as a vast roaming ground for cowboys an

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards