NdGoyal
I am confused between 2 options in the below questions. Can some one explain how to eliminate wrong choice definitively?
Q2. The author of the passage would most likely describe the findings of Raup and Sepkoski as
(B) significant, because the findings were an impetus for subsequent research
(E) definitive, because the findings confirmed the existence of a rhythmically recurring force
Q3. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with
(C) establishing a link between the disciplines of paleontology and geology
(E) explaining how a theory concerning geologic events was formulated
Also if someone could recommend a strategy to handle such R.C questions? Such as in CR we have to choose the best choice in line with the conclusion of the argument. But I am struggling with this in R.C.
Posted from my mobile deviceHi
NdGoyal,
Quote:
Q2. The author of the passage would most likely describe the findings of Raup and Sepkoski as
(B) significant, because the findings were an impetus for subsequent research
(E) definitive, because the findings confirmed the existence of a rhythmically recurring force
B can be inferred from the lines :"These findings, combined with the research of Raup and Sepkoski,
led scientists to hypothesize the existence of some kind of cyclically recurring force powerful enough to affect living things profoundly. ". These lines imply that the findings of Raup and Sepkoski led scientists to form a powerful hypothesis.
E is incorrect, as it describes the findings as definitive, because the finding confirmed the existence of a rhythmically recurring force, but it's not mentioned anywhere in the passage that the findings confirmed any such existence. What's mentioned is that they provided a strong basis of further research.
Thus B is a clear winner.
Quote:
Q3. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with
(C) establishing a link between the disciplines of paleontology and geology
(E) explaining how a theory concerning geologic events was formulated
The passage starts with : "
The origin of the theory that major geologic events may occur at regular intervals can be traced back not to a study of volcanism or plate tectonics
but to an investigation of marine extinctions. ", and then the author goes on to explain how paleontologists Raup and Sepkoski investigated these extinctions and that their findings led scientists to form a speculation about the existence of a rhythmically recurring force that might be affecting geologic events and led geologists to search for evidence of periodicity in episodes of volcanism.
The author is nowhere trying to establish any link between paleontology and geology, he is simply explaining how the theory of existence of recurring force that might be affecting geologic events was formulated.
Thus E is the correct answer.
I would recommend you to look for answers inside the passage, sometimes the answers can be directly inferred, but sometimes, a more careful reading and understanding of the passage is required. I would suggest you go through the below link, it might help you:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/experts-topic-of-the-week-5-22-17-ultimate-rc-guide-for-beginners-241004.htmlHope This Helps.
Thanks.