GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 25 Apr 2018, 22:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8025
Location: Pune, India
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Mar 2017, 01:28
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
blockman wrote:
The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can,in part,be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.

A. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as
B. Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is
C. That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is, in part, explainable as
D. One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region is that there was
E. Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with one explanation for this being

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA: D
Can someone please explain what is wrong with E


Sorry: fixed answer choices, should be "remarkably" in B,C,E


Responding to a pm:

When you explain A as B, you are equating the two.

Here are a couple of real world examples of the usage:

The racial bias observed is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates.
How cluster headache is explained as an intracavernous inflammatory process lesioning sympathetic fibers... (Heading)

When you want to give the cause of a certain phenomenon, you use "explain by"

Tomasetti and Vogelstein conclude that these differences can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions.

In options (A) and (C), the similarity of objects is because of the rapid movement of people. So "explained as" is not correct.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Posts: 114
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.4
Reviews Badge
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2017, 20:09
1
This post received
KUDOS
Yes! Absolutely!

"Explained by" is the correct way to express a reason/cause for something.

"Explained as" is used when you are equating two things.

Example - John's results can be explained by analyzing his strategy.

The incorrect version - John's results can be explained as analyzing his strategy. You'll notice that this structure does not lend the meaning nicely.

Tip - Simplify the sentence and look at the structure. It helps in zeroing in on the correct choice.

Hope this helps!

Best,
SS18


282552 wrote:
Had option A used "Explained By", then would it be correct
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2012
Posts: 62
GMAT Date: 11-01-2012
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2017, 07:43
daagh wrote:
A. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as --- ‘explained as’ is wrong in the context it should be ‘explained by’

B. Thule artifacts being remarkable similar throughout a vast region (no verb), one explanation is—‘being remarkable’ used as modifier is not acceptable

C. That Thule artifacts are remarkable similar throughout a vast region, in part, explainable as – a fragment

D. One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts through a vast region is that there was – the best choice
E. Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkable similar, with one explanation for this being –
Remarkable similar – two adjectives in sequence is weird, it should be ‘remarkably similar’



Dear daagh .. some options just hinges on idioms (In A) ...can you point towards some good sources for learning idioms which arent too many but enough for the GMAT..i get stumped with explained by / explained as ...if explained by would be in an answer choice its still easier... I eliminated D thinking there was is Wordy "Use of there is generally not preferred on GMAT in most questions as a more crisp answer exists...
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2012
Posts: 62
GMAT Date: 11-01-2012
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2017, 07:46
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
blockman wrote:
The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can,in part,be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.

A. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as
B. Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is
C. That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is, in part, explainable as
D. One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region is that there was
E. Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with one explanation for this being

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA: D
Can someone please explain what is wrong with E


Sorry: fixed answer choices, should be "remarkably" in B,C,E


Responding to a pm:

When you explain A as B, you are equating the two.

Here are a couple of real world examples of the usage:

The racial bias observed is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates.
How cluster headache is explained as an intracavernous inflammatory process lesioning sympathetic fibers... (Heading)

When you want to give the cause of a certain phenomenon, you use "explain by"

Tomasetti and Vogelstein conclude that these differences can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions.

In options (A) and (C), the similarity of objects is because of the rapid movement of people. So "explained as" is not correct.


Karishma thanks for the thoughts ... what are the best places to revise Idioms will be ??
1 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3356
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2017, 08:01
1
This post received
KUDOS
deependra1234 wrote:
Karishma thanks for the thoughts ... what are the best places to revise Idioms will be ??


Hey,

This post may help you.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-idioms- ... 80342.html

Thanks
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?


How to use this forum in THE BEST way?


New --> How ApplicantLab made me reach my 10 years long MBA dream?

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 119
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.99
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2017, 05:38
OG: Instead of equating similarity with movement, the sentence needs to identify this movement of people as a cause of similarity among artifacts.

The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can,in part,be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.
similarity != movement

Example given by daagh:
The Tajmahal is explained as a monument of love and caring of a husband for his wife.
The Tajmahal = a monument of love
Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8025
Location: Pune, India
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2017, 08:27
deependra1234 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
blockman wrote:
The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can,in part,be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.

A. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as
B. Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is
C. That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is, in part, explainable as
D. One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region is that there was
E. Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with one explanation for this being

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA: D
Can someone please explain what is wrong with E


Sorry: fixed answer choices, should be "remarkably" in B,C,E


Responding to a pm:

When you explain A as B, you are equating the two.

Here are a couple of real world examples of the usage:

The racial bias observed is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates.
How cluster headache is explained as an intracavernous inflammatory process lesioning sympathetic fibers... (Heading)

When you want to give the cause of a certain phenomenon, you use "explain by"

Tomasetti and Vogelstein conclude that these differences can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions.

In options (A) and (C), the similarity of objects is because of the rapid movement of people. So "explained as" is not correct.


Karishma thanks for the thoughts ... what are the best places to revise Idioms will be ??



Here are some thoughts on learning idioms:

https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... rom-rumor/
https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... score-700/
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2012
Posts: 62
GMAT Date: 11-01-2012
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2017, 08:58
deependra1234 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
blockman wrote:
The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can,in part,be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.

A. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as
B. Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is
C. That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is, in part, explainable as
D. One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region is that there was
E. Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with one explanation for this being

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA: D
Can someone please explain what is wrong with E


Sorry: fixed answer choices, should be "remarkably" in B,C,E


Responding to a pm:

When you explain A as B, you are equating the two.

Here are a couple of real world examples of the usage:

The racial bias observed is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates.
How cluster headache is explained as an intracavernous inflammatory process lesioning sympathetic fibers... (Heading)

When you want to give the cause of a certain phenomenon, you use "explain by"

Tomasetti and Vogelstein conclude that these differences can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions.

In options (A) and (C), the similarity of objects is because of the rapid movement of people. So "explained as" is not correct.


Karishma thanks for the thoughts ... what are the best places to revise Idioms will be ??


Here are some thoughts on learning idioms:

https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... rom-rumor/
https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... score-700/


hahah ammm thanks for the links Karishma .... Well too early for a wine in US i guess ..hence must be your subtle wit or your son keeping you busy hence the wrong links :P ..... but if at all i have to decipher... I guess Idioms are though not going away there must be other ways to solve a question and some obsolete idiom will not make or break a question... btw I follow most of your posts and Blog writings and hugely appreciate your work mam... Hence would request you to answer a question i posted on the forum regarding my way forward strategy :wink: .. would request you to pl have a look if you can mam...
https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-how-to- ... 38763.html
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 355
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2017, 02:31
The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can,in part,be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.

A. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as
--> "explained as" is wrong; instead, it should be "explained by".

B. Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is
--> "explanation" is for a phenomenon (here is "remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts"), not for "Thule artifacts"!!!

C. That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is, in part, explainable as
--> "explained as" is wrong; instead, it should be "explained by".

D. One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region is that there was
--> clearly and structurally good --> correct.

E. Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with one explanation for this being
--> wordy and awkward.
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 24 May 2017
Posts: 64
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2017, 03:21
The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.

(A) The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as - "explained as" cannot be used.. we need "explained by" here
(B) Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is - "being" modifies "artifacts" incorrectly + ", one explanation as" is not connected to the previous clause
(C) That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is, in part, explainable as - "explained as" cannot be used.. we need "explained by" here
(D) One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region is that there was - CORRECT
(E) Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with one explanation for this being - ", with one explanation for this being" is of course incorrect
_________________

NOTE: I am not an expert, therefore my analysis answering the questions may be incorrect and may not be relied upon. However I will appreciate if you can correct the mistakes I may have made in my analysis.

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Posts: 20
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2017, 10:29
Question: "similarity of Thule artifacts from Alaska to Greenland" isn't this incorrectly comparing artifacts from Alaska to the country Greenland?
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3356
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2017, 10:38
daftypatty wrote:
Question: "similarity of Thule artifacts from Alaska to Greenland" isn't this incorrectly comparing artifacts from Alaska to the country Greenland?


Hi daftypatty ,

You have slightly misunderstood the meaning.

It is saying artifacts from one region to another. It is not comparing artifacts of one region with the artifacts of another region.

Does that make sense?
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?


How to use this forum in THE BEST way?


New --> How ApplicantLab made me reach my 10 years long MBA dream?

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 145
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q48 V20
WE: Other (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2017, 03:16
What is function of That in D? Could anyone explain the context.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When nothing seem to help, I would go and look at a Stonecutter hammering away at his rock perhaps a hundred time without as much as a crack showing in it.
Yet at the hundred and first blow it would split in two.
And I knew it was not that blow that did it, But all that had gone Before
.

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2497
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2017, 14:42
Prashant10692 wrote:
What is function of That in D? Could anyone explain the context.



Hello Prashant10692,

I will be glad to help you out with this one. :-)

In the correct answer choice D, that is a connector/conjunction that joins the preceding independent clause with the following dependent clause.

Basically, the entire that clause acts as an object of the verb is.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 260
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2017, 04:37
blockman wrote:
The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to the other.

(A) The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part, be explained as
(B) Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one explanation is
(C) That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is, in part, explainable as
(D) One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region is that there was
(E) Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with one explanation for this being


look at choice b.

in the pattern,
noun+noun modifier +main clause.
there are many meaning relation between noun+noun modifier and the main clause, some of them context of main clause, and reason of main clause

but, noun+noun modifer neve is the effect in the causal relation. this phrase must be cause of the main clause
B is wrong.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Posts: 132
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2017, 17:41
egmat wrote:
Prashant10692 wrote:
What is function of That in D? Could anyone explain the context.



Hello Prashant10692,

I will be glad to help you out with this one. :-)

In the correct answer choice D, that is a connector/conjunction that joins the preceding independent clause with the following dependent clause.

Basically, the entire that clause acts as an object of the verb is.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha


Hi Shraddha
I felt that this usage of "that" with "there was" was awkward and therefore did not pick option D. I thought that only FANBOYS can connect two clauses.
Would you be able to share some examples, other OG questions where "that" is used to connect two clauses?

Thanks in advance.
Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8025
Location: Pune, India
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2017, 04:36
Prashant10692 wrote:
What is function of That in D? Could anyone explain the context.


Check this post on conjunctions: https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2014/0 ... -the-gmat/

Also, a that-clause can function as a subject, object, complement, or appositive in a declarative sentence.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Posts: 132
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2017, 07:31
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Prashant10692 wrote:
What is function of That in D? Could anyone explain the context.


Check this post on conjunctions: https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2014/0 ... -the-gmat/

Also, a that-clause can function as a subject, object, complement, or appositive in a declarative sentence.

Thank you so much for the reference. Exactly what I needed.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Posts: 132
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2017, 07:50
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Prashant10692 wrote:
What is function of That in D? Could anyone explain the context.


Check this post on conjunctions: https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2014/0 ... -the-gmat/

Also, a that-clause can function as a subject, object, complement, or appositive in a declarative sentence.

In D, is usage of “that” to introduce a clause is using it as “subordinating conjunction”?


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2497
Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2017, 14:45
sevenplusplus wrote:

Hi Shraddha
I felt that this usage of "that" with "there was" was awkward and therefore did not pick option D. I thought that only FANBOYS can connect two clauses.
Would you be able to share some examples, other OG questions where "that" is used to connect two clauses?

Thanks in advance.





Hello sevenplusplus,

Thank you for the query. :-)

Usage of the subordination conjunction that to connect two clauses is very common across the GMAT SC.

Following are just a few examples:

OG 16#9: In a review of 2,000 studies of human behavior that date back to the 1940s, two Swiss psychologists declared that since most of the studies had failed to control for variables such as social class and family size, none could be taken seriously.


OG 16#10 : A long-term study of some 1,000 physicians indicates that the more coffee these doctors drank, the greater was their likelihood of having coronary disease.


OG 16#32: The widely accepted big bang theory holds that the universe began in an explosive instant ten to twenty billion years ago and has been expanding ever since.



Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Re: The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region   [#permalink] 08 Nov 2017, 14:45

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 43 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.