Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:55 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gccracker
Joined: 06 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Aug 2015
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
471
 [452]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 6
Kudos: 471
 [452]
251
Kudos
Add Kudos
200
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
haardiksharma
Joined: 17 May 2017
Last visit: 23 Jun 2025
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
810
 [4]
Given Kudos: 246
GPA: 3
Products:
Posts: 105
Kudos: 810
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
asthagupta
Joined: 10 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2021
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
122
 [2]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V31
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 51
Kudos: 122
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Sueds
Joined: 13 Feb 2018
Last visit: 30 Apr 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 132
Posts: 2
Kudos: 2
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gccracker
Hello Everyone,

During my preparation for the GMAT , I found it difficult to remember the different forms of usage of "with" as is used in many official SC questions .

So I have compiled a small document that helped me a lot to understand the usage of "with".

Sharing it here for mutual benefit.



Usages of With

1) “With” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause.
For Eg:
i) The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

Here “with” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause === The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted.

So we can see that “Comma + With” acts as an adverbial Modifier

ii) Environmental groups have filed a mass of lawsuits against the government’s inaction, with the result that the Supreme Court plays a larger role in environmental protection than its equivalent does in any other big country - an odd way to set policy.

Here also “comma + with” is used to give the result of preceding action


2) With + noun

“With” is used when the noun after “with” attaches to the subject of preceding clause. Here with phrase gives more information about the preceding subject .
Also a noun after with should be a sub component of the subject of preceding clause

Matt has a very full schedule this week, with every one of his available time slots occupied.

--> this sentence works, because "with" actually applies to Matt and/or his schedule -- i.e., Matt is the person with those occupied time slots, and/or his schedule is actually the thing with those time slots.

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter


In the Above sentence=== "some" is referring to the colonies themselves, so that sentence is literally talking about "colonies with colonies". that doesn't make sense.


Now this sentence,
Emily and Nora fell asleep, with Emily still having wet hair.
This doesn't work, because Emily is not a sub-component of Emily.
Generally, the noun should be some component of the previous subject
James was injured badly in the accident, with three bones broken badly enough to require surgery.

In this kind of construction"”with + noun + verbED/verbING"”the noun should be some component of the previous thing. I.e., here, the bones are part of James.



Please give kudos if you liked this post !!

Hi gccracker. thanks for detailed explanation!
But i'm still confused with the sentence "The thirteen original British colonies in North America, with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter". If we regard "13 colonies" as a collective entity, then "some" and "others" are elements in this entity. In this case, can we use "with" to add more information to these 13 colonies?
User avatar
GmatDaddy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 11 Aug 2016
Last visit: 29 Jan 2022
Posts: 332
Own Kudos:
397
 [1]
Given Kudos: 97
Products:
Posts: 332
Kudos: 397
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gccracker
Hello Everyone,

During my preparation for the GMAT , I found it difficult to remember the different forms of usage of "with" as is used in many official SC questions .

So I have compiled a small document that helped me a lot to understand the usage of "with".

Sharing it here for mutual benefit.



Usages of With

1) “With” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause.
For Eg:
i) The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

Here “with” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause === The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted.

So we can see that “Comma + With” acts as an adverbial Modifier

ii) Environmental groups have filed a mass of lawsuits against the government’s inaction, with the result that the Supreme Court plays a larger role in environmental protection than its equivalent does in any other big country - an odd way to set policy.

Here also “comma + with” is used to give the result of preceding action


2) With + noun

“With” is used when the noun after “with” attaches to the subject of preceding clause. Here with phrase gives more information about the preceding subject .
Also a noun after with should be a sub component of the subject of preceding clause

Matt has a very full schedule this week, with every one of his available time slots occupied.

--> this sentence works, because "with" actually applies to Matt and/or his schedule -- i.e., Matt is the person with those occupied time slots, and/or his schedule is actually the thing with those time slots.

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter


In the Above sentence=== "some" is referring to the colonies themselves, so that sentence is literally talking about "colonies with colonies". that doesn't make sense.


Now this sentence,
Emily and Nora fell asleep, with Emily still having wet hair.
This doesn't work, because Emily is not a sub-component of Emily.
Generally, the noun should be some component of the previous subject
James was injured badly in the accident, with three bones broken badly enough to require surgery.

In this kind of construction"”with + noun + verbED/verbING"”the noun should be some component of the previous thing. I.e., here, the bones are part of James.



Please give kudos if you liked this post !!

Experts !
It would be of great help if any Verbal expert can verify the above post (" The usage of With in Gmat")
mikemcgarry, GMATNinja, chetan2u, KarishmaB, souvik101990
User avatar
VodkaHelps
Joined: 01 Nov 2017
Last visit: 05 Apr 2020
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V35
GMAT 3: 680 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.84
Products:
GMAT 3: 680 Q47 V36
Posts: 75
Kudos: 98
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GmatDaddy
gccracker
Hello Everyone,

During my preparation for the GMAT , I found it difficult to remember the different forms of usage of "with" as is used in many official SC questions .

So I have compiled a small document that helped me a lot to understand the usage of "with".

Sharing it here for mutual benefit.



Usages of With

1) “With” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause.
For Eg:
i) The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

Here “with” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause === The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted.

So we can see that “Comma + With” acts as an adverbial Modifier

ii) Environmental groups have filed a mass of lawsuits against the government’s inaction, with the result that the Supreme Court plays a larger role in environmental protection than its equivalent does in any other big country - an odd way to set policy.

Here also “comma + with” is used to give the result of preceding action


2) With + noun

“With” is used when the noun after “with” attaches to the subject of preceding clause. Here with phrase gives more information about the preceding subject .
Also a noun after with should be a sub component of the subject of preceding clause

Matt has a very full schedule this week, with every one of his available time slots occupied.

--> this sentence works, because "with" actually applies to Matt and/or his schedule -- i.e., Matt is the person with those occupied time slots, and/or his schedule is actually the thing with those time slots.

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter


In the Above sentence=== "some" is referring to the colonies themselves, so that sentence is literally talking about "colonies with colonies". that doesn't make sense.


Now this sentence,
Emily and Nora fell asleep, with Emily still having wet hair.
This doesn't work, because Emily is not a sub-component of Emily.
Generally, the noun should be some component of the previous subject
James was injured badly in the accident, with three bones broken badly enough to require surgery.

In this kind of construction"”with + noun + verbED/verbING"”the noun should be some component of the previous thing. I.e., here, the bones are part of James.



Please give kudos if you liked this post !!



This is a very interesting topic as I have been confused on how to use "with" in a modifier clause. I appreciate gccracker contribution so much. Nevertheless, it would be super awesome if any of the expert confirm this or add more to this as "with" can be very confusing a lot of times. I also notice that GMAT loves to use "with" in wrong sentences, yet many times answers with "with" actually are correct. I wonder why there are almost no topics about usages of "with?"
User avatar
GmatDaddy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 11 Aug 2016
Last visit: 29 Jan 2022
Posts: 332
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97
Products:
Posts: 332
Kudos: 397
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alexlearning17
GmatDaddy
gccracker
Hello Everyone,

During my preparation for the GMAT , I found it difficult to remember the different forms of usage of "with" as is used in many official SC questions .

So I have compiled a small document that helped me a lot to understand the usage of "with".

Sharing it here for mutual benefit.



Usages of With

1) “With” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause.
For Eg:
i) The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

Here “with” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause === The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted.

So we can see that “Comma + With” acts as an adverbial Modifier

ii) Environmental groups have filed a mass of lawsuits against the government’s inaction, with the result that the Supreme Court plays a larger role in environmental protection than its equivalent does in any other big country - an odd way to set policy.

Here also “comma + with” is used to give the result of preceding action


2) With + noun

“With” is used when the noun after “with” attaches to the subject of preceding clause. Here with phrase gives more information about the preceding subject .
Also a noun after with should be a sub component of the subject of preceding clause

Matt has a very full schedule this week, with every one of his available time slots occupied.

--> this sentence works, because "with" actually applies to Matt and/or his schedule -- i.e., Matt is the person with those occupied time slots, and/or his schedule is actually the thing with those time slots.

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter


In the Above sentence=== "some" is referring to the colonies themselves, so that sentence is literally talking about "colonies with colonies". that doesn't make sense.


Now this sentence,
Emily and Nora fell asleep, with Emily still having wet hair.
This doesn't work, because Emily is not a sub-component of Emily.
Generally, the noun should be some component of the previous subject
James was injured badly in the accident, with three bones broken badly enough to require surgery.

In this kind of construction"”with + noun + verbED/verbING"”the noun should be some component of the previous thing. I.e., here, the bones are part of James.



Please give kudos if you liked this post !!



This is a very interesting topic as I have been confused on how to use "with" in a modifier clause. I appreciate gccracker contribution so much. Nevertheless, it would be super awesome if any of the expert confirm this or add more to this as "with" can be very confusing a lot of times. I also notice that GMAT loves to use "with" in wrong sentences, yet many times answers with "with" actually are correct. I wonder why there are almost no topics about usages of "with?"

Yep you are correct, Usage of with is pretty common in GMAT. However not much theory/rules exist for its usage(as far as i know). It would be great if some expert can chip in and provide his/her inputs !
avatar
ArupRS
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Last visit: 02 Jul 2025
Posts: 255
Own Kudos:
248
 [5]
Given Kudos: 358
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
Posts: 255
Kudos: 248
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VodkaHelps
Joined: 01 Nov 2017
Last visit: 05 Apr 2020
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
98
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V35
GMAT 3: 680 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.84
Products:
GMAT 3: 680 Q47 V36
Posts: 75
Kudos: 98
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ArupRS

I once read this but forgot that this post exists. Thank you for reminding!
User avatar
gmat1393
User avatar
Share GMAT Experience Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 644
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 644
Kudos: 2,545
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gccracker
Hello Everyone,

During my preparation for the GMAT , I found it difficult to remember the different forms of usage of "with" as is used in many official SC questions .

So I have compiled a small document that helped me a lot to understand the usage of "with".

Sharing it here for mutual benefit.



Usages of With

1) “With” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause.
For Eg:
i) The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

Here “with” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause === The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted.

So we can see that “Comma + With” acts as an adverbial Modifier

ii) Environmental groups have filed a mass of lawsuits against the government’s inaction, with the result that the Supreme Court plays a larger role in environmental protection than its equivalent does in any other big country - an odd way to set policy.

Here also “comma + with” is used to give the result of preceding action


2) With + noun

“With” is used when the noun after “with” attaches to the subject of preceding clause. Here with phrase gives more information about the preceding subject .
Also a noun after with should be a sub component of the subject of preceding clause

Matt has a very full schedule this week, with every one of his available time slots occupied.

--> this sentence works, because "with" actually applies to Matt and/or his schedule -- i.e., Matt is the person with those occupied time slots, and/or his schedule is actually the thing with those time slots.

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter


In the Above sentence=== "some" is referring to the colonies themselves, so that sentence is literally talking about "colonies with colonies". that doesn't make sense.


Now this sentence,
Emily and Nora fell asleep, with Emily still having wet hair.
This doesn't work, because Emily is not a sub-component of Emily.
Generally, the noun should be some component of the previous subject
James was injured badly in the accident, with three bones broken badly enough to require surgery.

In this kind of construction"”with + noun + verbED/verbING"”the noun should be some component of the previous thing. I.e., here, the bones are part of James.



Please give kudos if you liked this post !!

Hi egmat chetan2u DmitryFarber

Can you please confirm on the usage of with mentioned here.

Thanks!
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,960
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gccracker
Hello Everyone,

During my preparation for the GMAT , I found it difficult to remember the different forms of usage of "with" as is used in many official SC questions .

So I have compiled a small document that helped me a lot to understand the usage of "with".

Sharing it here for mutual benefit.



Usages of With

1) “With” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause.
For Eg:
i) The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

Here “with” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause === The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted.

So we can see that “Comma + With” acts as an adverbial Modifier

ii) Environmental groups have filed a mass of lawsuits against the government’s inaction, with the result that the Supreme Court plays a larger role in environmental protection than its equivalent does in any other big country - an odd way to set policy.

Here also “comma + with” is used to give the result of preceding action


2) With + noun

“With” is used when the noun after “with” attaches to the subject of preceding clause. Here with phrase gives more information about the preceding subject .
Also a noun after with should be a sub component of the subject of preceding clause

Matt has a very full schedule this week, with every one of his available time slots occupied.

--> this sentence works, because "with" actually applies to Matt and/or his schedule -- i.e., Matt is the person with those occupied time slots, and/or his schedule is actually the thing with those time slots.

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter


In the Above sentence=== "some" is referring to the colonies themselves, so that sentence is literally talking about "colonies with colonies". that doesn't make sense.


Now this sentence,
Emily and Nora fell asleep, with Emily still having wet hair.
This doesn't work, because Emily is not a sub-component of Emily.
Generally, the noun should be some component of the previous subject
James was injured badly in the accident, with three bones broken badly enough to require surgery.

In this kind of construction"”with + noun + verbED/verbING"”the noun should be some component of the previous thing. I.e., here, the bones are part of James.



Please give kudos if you liked this post !!

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyTargetTestPrep , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma , generis , jennpt , other experts -
Although some of the examples used seem to be official sentences, can you please authenticate the usages of WITH stated in the above post?
User avatar
jawele
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Last visit: 14 Oct 2024
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
157
 [1]
Given Kudos: 658
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Posts: 126
Kudos: 157
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
gccracker
Hello Everyone,

During my preparation for the GMAT , I found it difficult to remember the different forms of usage of "with" as is used in many official SC questions .

So I have compiled a small document that helped me a lot to understand the usage of "with".

Sharing it here for mutual benefit.



Usages of With

1) “With” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause.
For Eg:
i) The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

Here “with” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause === The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted.

So we can see that “Comma + With” acts as an adverbial Modifier

ii) Environmental groups have filed a mass of lawsuits against the government’s inaction, with the result that the Supreme Court plays a larger role in environmental protection than its equivalent does in any other big country - an odd way to set policy.

Here also “comma + with” is used to give the result of preceding action


2) With + noun

“With” is used when the noun after “with” attaches to the subject of preceding clause. Here with phrase gives more information about the preceding subject .
Also a noun after with should be a sub component of the subject of preceding clause

Matt has a very full schedule this week, with every one of his available time slots occupied.

--> this sentence works, because "with" actually applies to Matt and/or his schedule -- i.e., Matt is the person with those occupied time slots, and/or his schedule is actually the thing with those time slots.

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter


In the Above sentence=== "some" is referring to the colonies themselves, so that sentence is literally talking about "colonies with colonies". that doesn't make sense.


Now this sentence,
Emily and Nora fell asleep, with Emily still having wet hair.
This doesn't work, because Emily is not a sub-component of Emily.
Generally, the noun should be some component of the previous subject
James was injured badly in the accident, with three bones broken badly enough to require surgery.

In this kind of construction"”with + noun + verbED/verbING"”the noun should be some component of the previous thing. I.e., here, the bones are part of James.



Please give kudos if you liked this post !!

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyTargetTestPrep , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma , generis , jennpt , other experts -
Although some of the examples used seem to be official sentences, can you please authenticate the usages of WITH stated in the above post?

I would also appreciate if somebody could validate this

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyTargetTestPrep , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma , generis , jennpt
User avatar
MagooshExpert
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Last visit: 15 Jan 2020
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
436
 [2]
Given Kudos: 20
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 231
Kudos: 436
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jawele
Skywalker18
gccracker
Hello Everyone,

During my preparation for the GMAT , I found it difficult to remember the different forms of usage of "with" as is used in many official SC questions .

So I have compiled a small document that helped me a lot to understand the usage of "with".

Sharing it here for mutual benefit.



Usages of With

1) “With” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause.
For Eg:
i) The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

Here “with” is used to give the result of the action in preceding clause === The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted.

So we can see that “Comma + With” acts as an adverbial Modifier

ii) Environmental groups have filed a mass of lawsuits against the government’s inaction, with the result that the Supreme Court plays a larger role in environmental protection than its equivalent does in any other big country - an odd way to set policy.

Here also “comma + with” is used to give the result of preceding action


2) With + noun

“With” is used when the noun after “with” attaches to the subject of preceding clause. Here with phrase gives more information about the preceding subject .
Also a noun after with should be a sub component of the subject of preceding clause

Matt has a very full schedule this week, with every one of his available time slots occupied.

--> this sentence works, because "with" actually applies to Matt and/or his schedule -- i.e., Matt is the person with those occupied time slots, and/or his schedule is actually the thing with those time slots.

The thirteen original British colonies in North America, with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter


In the Above sentence=== "some" is referring to the colonies themselves, so that sentence is literally talking about "colonies with colonies". that doesn't make sense.


Now this sentence,
Emily and Nora fell asleep, with Emily still having wet hair.
This doesn't work, because Emily is not a sub-component of Emily.
Generally, the noun should be some component of the previous subject
James was injured badly in the accident, with three bones broken badly enough to require surgery.

In this kind of construction"”with + noun + verbED/verbING"”the noun should be some component of the previous thing. I.e., here, the bones are part of James.



Please give kudos if you liked this post !!

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyTargetTestPrep , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma , generis , jennpt , other experts -
Although some of the examples used seem to be official sentences, can you please authenticate the usages of WITH stated in the above post?

I would also appreciate if somebody could validate this

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyTargetTestPrep , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma , generis , jennpt
Hi jawele, Skywalker18, and gmat1393,

All of the above looks correct to me :)

Best,
Carolyn
User avatar
mykrasovski
Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Last visit: 17 Apr 2022
Posts: 341
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 253
Location: United States
WE:General Management (Other)
Posts: 341
Kudos: 323
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wonderful post.

Here is a post by mikemcgarry about the usage of with + [noun] + [participle] structure.
User avatar
sakshiagarwal96
Joined: 05 Oct 2017
Last visit: 31 May 2021
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 31
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat, what does 'themselves' in option B refer to here- companies or benefits?
User avatar
Victz
Joined: 14 Mar 2020
Last visit: 19 Sep 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 315
Status:Having fun Growing Mental Agility & Toughness (GMAT) ^_^
Mantra: "There is a will, there is a way."
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35 (Online)
GMAT 2: 720 Q47 V42
GMAT 3: 740 Q49 V41
Products:
GMAT 3: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 56
Kudos: 127
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks a lot for summarizing this, with the result that many of us learned from it.
Your post has been appreciated by many, with more than 100 kudos!

Another official example to share:
Quote:
The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale, with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, connected by a complex regional system of roads.
User avatar
CRACKGMATNUT
Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Last visit: 26 May 2024
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 150
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi EducationAisle

Is the above explanation correct ?
Can you throw some light on the uses of "with"
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Indeed Mayank, "with" is very versatile, in terms of usage. However, I do believe that the Magoosh Blog does a good job at summarizing it.
Moderators:
188 posts
Current Student
710 posts
Current Student
275 posts