ElninoEffect wrote:
Hey
AbhiroopGhoshMy whole reasoning of choosing A was it was better than all the other options and i never ever dreamed that C would be the answer it just doesn't make sense.
Now coming to your question, I decoded the meaning as the average weight reduced by almost 7 kg on average in the first 2 months of the program (which started earlier this year, hence past)
after(denoting timeline) it increased by 8% in the past three years. - So since the weight increased in the past the use of past tense seemed correct to me.
No doubt if C had used decreased it's better than A but the meaning is entirely opposite right now.
I always give preference to meaning over grammer.
Now you tell me where i am at fault.?
Hey
ElninoEffect gloomybison,
Thanks for responding ! Appreciate sharing your thoughts and line of reasoning.
While I am not a verbal expert (in fact light years away from being one
) sharing my thoughts in a bit detail. Please pardon my ignorance and correct me where you guys feel my thoughts have gone wrong.
Here are my two cents on the sentence. I generally break the sentence and read. The original sentence is presented in blue font and my thinking is in italics-
The results of the recent diet program that
The sentence presents result of a recent diet program
Let me read further .. was launched early this year The program was launched early this year.
The relative pronoun 'that' refers to the program
are evident in all the participants’ average weightThe program was launched early this year, but the results are still evident as of the time the sentence was made.
So, there is a connection between some past event and the present moment.
'May be' the sentence uses present perfect tense. Let me read further ... which reduced by almost 7kg on an average during the first 2 months of the programThe relative pronoun which refers to the weight.
So the weight of the participants reduced by almost 7 kgs during the first 2 months of the program
The reduction of the weight is probably a part of the results that we were presented in the non underlined portion. The effect of the weight reduction is still felt, however the use of past tense gives an impression that the action is over. The use of present perfect tense can resolve this.
For ex: I have eaten my dinner.
The action of eating is over in the past, however I can feel its effect (may be I am full).
after it increased by 8% in the last three years.'it' refers to the weight of the participants
so .. the weight reduced after it increased by 8% in the last three years
in the last three years - is a timeframe. Past tense is used to denote an action at a particular time in the past.
As we a referring to a duration here , may be a better construction can be made
To sum up - there were two key areas in the sentence which was the basis of selecting C -
1) use of 'are evident', indicating that the effect is still relevant in the time the sentence is made
2) use of a past time frame 'in the last three years.'
C resolves both the above points
The results of the recent diet program that was launched early this year are evident in all the participants’ average weight which
has increased by almost 7kg on an average during the first two months of the program after
increasing by 8% in the last three years.
I agree that C is not logically correct with the usage of "increased by almost 7kg"; however, if I consider that to be a typo error, the grammatical construction of the sentence seemed right to me.
P.S. - Again, I am not an expert so I wouldn't be surprised if the explanation is totally off