Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 20:26 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 20:26
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
User avatar
HouseStark
User avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2019
Last visit: 22 Jan 2021
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
283
Given Kudos: 90
Status:BELIEVE IN YOURSELF
Location: India
Posts: 97
Kudos: 283
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 01 Jul 2020, 20:00
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
Quote:
after; actions that could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.
dvn wrote
Quote:
anyone know why (d) after ; is not an Independnet clause?
That is just a noun phrase starting with the noun 'actions' and then a subordinate modifier clause, because it starts with a subject 'that' and a verb 'could sacrifice'. Please appreciate that the insertion of the word 'that' renders the whole a clause a DC and there is no independent clause(IC) after the semi colon; If you remove the word ' that' from the phrase, the clause then will be an free standing IC
GMAT SC tests all the sentence types that we use such as simple , complex , compound and compound-complex sentences , as also the essentials of various clauses such as independent clauses, dependent clauses, relative clauses, and substantive clauses and phrases that are used as appositives, absolutes adverbial and adjectives. One should be thorough with them as we start the preparations.
One small tip here: if you want to know all those factors and their usage, then read RC passages calmly. It will help RC, SC, and AWA
Show more

Sir, it will be of great help to me if you can explain the subordinate modifier in detail.
As far as I am aware of subordinate conjunction helps in connecting IC to DC.

Also, I have never seen "That" used as subordinate conjunction.

Others are also welcome to comment on this.
User avatar
gmexamtaker1
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2018
Last visit: 13 Feb 2023
Posts: 210
Own Kudos:
79
Given Kudos: 261
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 210
Kudos: 79
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 19 Nov 2020, 06:18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
Quote:
after; actions that could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.
dvn wrote
Quote:
anyone know why (d) after ; is not an Independnet clause?
That is just a noun phrase starting with the noun 'actions' and then a subordinate modifier clause, because it starts with a subject 'that' and a verb 'could sacrifice'. Please appreciate that the insertion of the word 'that' renders the whole a clause a DC and there is no independent clause(IC) after the semi colon; If you remove the word ' that' from the phrase, the clause then will be an free standing IC
GMAT SC tests all the sentence types that we use such as simple , complex , compound and compound-complex sentences , as also the essentials of various clauses such as independent clauses, dependent clauses, relative clauses, and substantive clauses and phrases that are used as appositives, absolutes adverbial and adjectives. One should be thorough with them as we start the preparations.
One small tip here: if you want to know all those factors and their usage, then read RC passages calmly. It will help RC, SC, and AWA
Show more

daagh

Hello daagh could we say that after the simi-colon the subject of "could" is "that" and the noun "actions" does not have a verb and that is the reason why the second part is a dependent clause and not an IC.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 19 Nov 2020, 07:08
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
UNSTOPPABLE12

Hello daagh could we say that after the simi-colon the subject of "could" is "that" and the noun "actions" does not have a verb and that is the reason why the second part is a dependent clause and not an IC.
Show more
Hi UNSTOPPABLE12, taking it on behalf of daagh Sir, since he is not currently active on the forum.

In D, the structure after the semicolon is:

actions that could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.

So, the structure is:

i) Noun (actions)
+
ii) Noun-modifier (that could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest)

For all practical purposes, Noun + Noun-modifier acts as a phrase (and not as a clause). Reiterating, second part is not a Dependent clause; at best, the second part contains a dependent clause that could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.

You can watch our video on Independent and Dependent clause.
User avatar
gmexamtaker1
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2018
Last visit: 13 Feb 2023
Posts: 210
Own Kudos:
79
Given Kudos: 261
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 210
Kudos: 79
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 19 Nov 2020, 08:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
UNSTOPPABLE12

Hello daagh could we say that after the simi-colon the subject of "could" is "that" and the noun "actions" does not have a verb and that is the reason why the second part is a dependent clause and not an IC.
Hi UNSTOPPABLE12, taking it on behalf of daagh Sir, since he is not currently active on the forum.

In D, the structure after the semicolon is:

actions that could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.

So, the structure is:

i) Noun (actions)
+
ii) Noun-modifier (that could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest)

For all practical purposes, Noun + Noun-modifier acts as a phrase (and not as a clause). Reiterating, second part is not a Dependent clause; at best, the second part contains a dependent clause that could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.

You can watch our video on Independent and Dependent clause.
Show more


EducationAisle, thank you for your prompt reply , one last question , is "can" considered a finite verb? so if for example we had "He could"would it be considered independent one? (I'm curious because I saw the "He worked" example in your video) I'm asking because in future SC problems I might encounter "could" and I'm wondering on whether I should look for its subject.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 19 Nov 2020, 21:06
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
UNSTOPPABLE12
one last question , is "can" considered a finite verb? so if for example we had "He could"would it be considered independent one? (I'm curious because I saw the "He worked" example in your video) I'm asking because in future SC problems I might encounter "could" and I'm wondering on whether I should look for its subject.
Show more
Without going into grammatical jargon, can or could should play a similar role, when it comes to determining independent/dependent clause.

For example: Pete can do his homework and Pete can do his homework are both independent clauses.
User avatar
GMATE1
User avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2020
Last visit: 31 Dec 2021
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
24
Given Kudos: 163
Posts: 61
Kudos: 24
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 31 Mar 2021, 02:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skientist
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an American adoptive mother who sent her adopted son back to Russia, may demand that an American adoptive parent provide his or her child with an environment that preserves the child’s Russian language and culture; some argue that such actions could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.

(A) may demand that an American adoptive parent provide his or her child with an environment that preserves the child’s Russian language and culture; some argue that such actions could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.

(B) may demand an American adoptive parent provide his or her child with an environment that preserves the child’s Russian language and culture; some argue that such actions could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.

(E) may demand that an American adoptive parent provides his or her child with an environment that preserves the child’s Russian language and culture; some argue that such actions could sacrifice children's lives to a phantom national interest.
Show more

After getting the question incorrect I was able to spot all the mistakes in B, C, D & E. HOWEVER, I am confused because I thought that the word "could" is the second half of the sentence is wrong. Isn't the second part of the sentence also using subjunctive in the phrase "argue that". I thought that it should be "some argue that such action could sacrifice". Is the could necessary here for the meaning because it shows that they believe that the consequence of the actions are only possible not necessary?

Thank you, kudos to you!
avatar
keyuwang
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2021
Last visit: 13 May 2022
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
14
Given Kudos: 6
GPA: 3.54
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 21
Kudos: 14
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 31 Mar 2021, 10:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why the "that" in B is a must???

I demand him do that for me - would be correct??
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,564
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,564
 [1]
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 31 Mar 2021, 10:53
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
keyuwang
The form of the command subjunctive is "bossy verb" + THAT + subject + bare infinitive (the infinitive form without "to."). That last verb is not really plural, as some commenters are saying.

So we'd say "I demand that he do that for me." We don't don't say "I demand you." We can use that construction with "command," but then we don't use the subjunctive: "I command you to do that for me."

A few other command subjunctive examples:

I recommend that she stay on the team.
The committee ordered that the results be made public.
We suggest that he arrive at least 30 minutes early.
avatar
keyuwang
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2021
Last visit: 13 May 2022
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
14
Given Kudos: 6
GPA: 3.54
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 21
Kudos: 14
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 31 Mar 2021, 11:03
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber

Thanks for the reply, are you saying the "THAT" is mandatory in that expression?
I feel like I've seen a SC question where subjunctive verb was used and the "THAT" was removed from the correct answer choice, but I cannot find you a reference.

But if you tell me yes, I'll trust you and put it in my notes.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,564
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,564
 [1]
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 31 Mar 2021, 11:09
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We do need "that" to create the command subjunctive form, but that doesn't mean we can't use these "bossy verbs" in other ways. There's no such thing as a subjunctive verb. We can say "I demand a raise" or "The evidence suggests that the government is involved." It's just that if we want to use them to show that an action was called for or recommended, we use the command subjunctive.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,831
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,831
Kudos: 986
The Russian government, in response to the actions of an 22 Sep 2023, 08:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts