Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:14 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,095
 [7]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,095
 [7]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,095
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,095
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
azhrhasan
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Last visit: 13 Sep 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
165
 [1]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: Canada
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:General Management (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 121
Kudos: 165
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
GMATINSECT
Joined: 17 Jun 2017
Last visit: 22 Jul 2020
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 56
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.

Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?

(A) Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.

(B) Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.

(C) The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.

(D) A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.(C)

(E) Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.

I fell for a trap inst the conclusion over here is "therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf".

If I'm looking for what else must be true to validate the conclusion, how is A not right if we do a negation test with A ?? Such as Most incidents involving grizzly bears are not fatal, in this case, the conclusion is broken. Hence this can be a valid choice. Please guide where am I going wrong ??
User avatar
azhrhasan
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Last visit: 13 Sep 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93
Location: Canada
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:General Management (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 121
Kudos: 165
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATINSECT
Bunuel
The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.

Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?

(A) Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.

(B) Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.

(C) The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.

(D) A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.(C)

(E) Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.

I fell for a trap inst the conclusion over here is "therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf".

If I'm looking for what else must be true to validate the conclusion, how is A not right if we do a negation test with A ?? Such as Most incidents involving grizzly bears are not fatal, in this case, the conclusion is broken. Hence this can be a valid choice. Please guide where am I going wrong ??

because the premise is comparing fatalities and says that fatalities from all these sources are equal. Premise is a fact. It has to be true no matter what conclusion you draw.
User avatar
closetooa
Joined: 26 Jan 2023
Last visit: 01 May 2024
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 102
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sir, why not E please explain
As i also answered C
User avatar
Catman
Joined: 03 Aug 2017
Last visit: 12 Feb 2025
Posts: 320
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 219
Products:
Posts: 320
Kudos: 328
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion of the argument-> Grizzly bear is as dangerous as electrocution by electric blenders or a lightning on golf courses because the same number of people are killed in all three. A correlation is made among all three.

(A) Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal. Incorrect, the author is discussing number of people killed. Fatal accidents may or may not lead to deaths.

(B) Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were. Incorrect, no point about how dangerous grizzly bears were, is discussed.

(C) The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness. Correct, author make the comparison by using the number of death in a particular year and use this statistics to corelate all three causes.

(D) A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm. Incorrect, Conclusion is about corelation among the 3 causes beacuse of the number of deaths and not about one particular cause i:e Golf Course.

(E) Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases. Incorrect, Suppose they have 1 death in each case, (which satisfy that these 3 are equally dangerous as per the coorelation made) out of let's say 10,000 cases due to the causes mentioned. But 1 out of 10,000 is not majority of cases.

Choice C.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
closetooa
Sir, why not E please explain

As i also answered C
The author concludes that "a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf." We're looking for an assumption on which this conclusion relies.

Here's (E):

Quote:
Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.
(E) discusses the proportion of cases that result in death. Specifically, to be considered dangerous, something must result in death more than half of the time.

Look again at the conclusion -- the things that the author deems "dangerous" include electric blenders and golf. Does the author assume that these things result in death more than half of the time?

Nope, that's not his/her argument at all. The author doesn't care about proportions. Instead, he/she cares about the total number of deaths. This total number is, according to the author, a good way to judge how dangerous something is. The proportion of how many people die in these scenarios could be way lower than half.

That's why (E) is not an assumption on which the argument relies.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,721
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,721
Kudos: 2,258
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.

Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?

(A) Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal. - WRONG. It's like E only, just that it has been rephrased.

(B) Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were. - WRONG. What grizzlies used to be like in past is not covered in the passage.

(C) The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness. - CORRECT. If not then passage conclusion is difficult to hold.

(D) A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm. - WRONG. Not a right way to assume while considering other factors.

(E) Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases. - WRONG. Whenever "only"(bit extreme) is used it's a red flag that needs special attention. Deaths are common in all cases but why it has to be majority of cases. It's not a necessity. If it is then we need to look into other factors too for what majority cases are in those ones.

Answer C.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts