Official Answer: B
Explanation -
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?The crux of the argument lies in the conclusion of the differences in functionality of the P53 gene. A. Bats and humans are exposed to roughly similar levels of environmental factors that could contribute to the development of cancer. -
Even if some cancer-causing factors affect humans and bats differently, this may not be enough to account for the significantly higher level of difference in cancer susceptibility between bats and humans. Without this assumption - the argument can still stand.B. The gene P53 functions in a way that can significantly influence an organism’s susceptibility to cancer. -
Correct. Without assuming the SIGNIFICANT influence of the P53 gene, we cannot blame humans' susceptibility to cancer solely on its different functionality. Negating this assumption leads us down a slippery slope of other possibilities that are being overlooked (the P53 gene may be working the same, yet there may be other factors that the author overlooks).C. Tumour development is the primary factor limiting the lifespan of small-bodied animals such as bats. -
Extreme. We do not need tumour development to be the PRIMARY factor. D. No other genetic or physiological mechanisms beyond P53 account for the bats' resistance to tumours. -
Too extreme. Nowhere does the author indicate that P53 is the ONLY reason behind bats' resistance to tumours. Even if it is not the ONLY reason behind our observations, it may be one of the major factors and the author chooses to focus on it. E. All animals that possess the P53 gene exhibit resistance to cancer. -
Extreme. Even if not all P53 animals display such resistance, humans may be a part of the subset that do.__________________________________________________________________________________________________Aakkash Singh 90V | CentPrep | Affordable Verbal TutorVisit www.calendly.com/aakkashgmat for a free verbal session!