It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 09:14

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 119 [1], given: 3

The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2013, 01:23
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

76% (01:22) correct 24% (01:44) wrong based on 294 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how deep the pilings are driven. Prior to 1700, pilings were driven to “refusal,” that is, to the point at which they refused to go any deeper. In a 1588 inquiry into the solidity of piers for Venice’s Rialto Bridge, it was determined that the bridge’s builder, Antonio Da Ponte, had met the contemporary standard for refusal: he had caused the pilings to be driven until additional penetration into the ground was no greater than two inches after twenty-four hammer blows.

Which one of the following can properly be inferred from the passage?

(A) The Rialto Bridge was built on unsafe pilings.
(B) The standard of refusal was not sufficient to ensure the safety of a bridge.
(C) Da Ponte’s standard of refusal was less strict than that of other bridge builders of his day.
(D) After 1588, no bridges were built on pilings that were driven to the point of refusal.
(E) It is possible that the pilings of the Rialto Bridge could have been driven deeper even after the standard of refusal had been met.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If questions jerk in your mind, then give me a KUDOS


Last edited by hazelnut on 23 May 2017, 07:57, edited 2 times in total.
Added the OA

Kudos [?]: 119 [1], given: 3

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2013
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2013, 06:53
Go with D. Either D / E.

D . prior to 1700,pfings were driven to "refusal. Clear indicator !
E. Last line indirectly says this option.

Please post the OA.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 188

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 349

Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Re: The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2013, 09:29
IMO E ... please post OA ... since point of refusal can be deeper if two inches was not the criteria...

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 349

Expert Post
Economist GMAT Tutor Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 7

Re: The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2013, 19:17
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A & B) Nothing in the passage about safety
C) "Contemporary standard" met
D) No information about what happened after 1588
E) Default answer; "additional penetration... no greater than," suggests penetration may not be 0.

_________________

Economist GMAT Tutor
http://econgm.at/econgmat
(866) 292-0660

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 7

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2014
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 170

Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2014, 01:42
Bump!

Can someone please explain why is it E.

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 170

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 23 Oct 2012
Posts: 323

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 58

GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.5
Re: The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2017, 04:54
sharmasneha wrote:
Bump!

Can someone please explain why is it E.



(A) The Rialto Bridge was built on unsafe pilings'
It is not mentioned in the passage

(B) The standard of refusal was not sufficient to ensure the safefy of a bridge.
Can't be infer from the passage

(C) Da Ponte's standard of refusal was less strict than that of other bridge builders of his day.
Can't be infer from the passage

(D) After 1588, no bridges were built on pilings that were driven to the point of refusal,
Opposite of what mentioned in passage

(E) It is possible that the pilings of the Rialto Bridge could have been driven deeper even after the standard of refusal had been met.

In a 1588 inquiry into the solidity of piers for Venice's Rialto Bridge, it was determined that the bridge's
builder, Antonio Da Ponte, had met the contemporary standard for refusal: he had caused the pilings to be driven until additional penetration into the ground was no greater than two inches after twenty-four hammer blows.


given above facts in the passage imply that the penetration can be done further.
_________________

#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos :)

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 58

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Status: Gmat lover
Joined: 27 Mar 2017
Posts: 86

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 24

Location: India
Schools: IIMA , IIMA PGPX"18
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.91
Reviews Badge
Re: The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2017, 06:46
(A) The Rialto Bridge was built on unsafe pilings' OUT of scope

(B) The standard of refusal was not sufficient to ensure the safefy of a bridge. OUT of scope

(C) Da Ponte's standard of refusal was less strict than that of other bridge builders of his day. OUT of scope

(D) After 1588, no bridges were built on pilings that were driven to the point of refusal, Opposite of what mentioned in passage

(E) It is possible that the pilings of the Rialto Bridge could have been driven deeper even after the standard of refusal had been met. CORRECT

KUDOS :P
_________________

_________________
Rules for posting in verbal Gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need.

“The great secret of true success, of true happiness, is this: the man or woman who asks for no return, the perfectly unselfish person, is the most successful.”
-Swami Vivekananda

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 24

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 13 Aug 2015
Posts: 203

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 64

GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.82
WE: Corporate Finance (Retail Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2017, 15:19
creativeminddu wrote:
The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how deep the pilings are driven. Prior to 1700, pilings were driven to “refusal,” that is, to the point at which they refused to go any deeper. In a 1588 inquiry into the solidity of piers for Venice’s Rialto Bridge, it was determined that the bridge’s builder, Antonio Da Ponte, had met the contemporary standard for refusal: he had caused the pilings to be driven until additional penetration into the ground was no greater than two inches after twenty-four hammer blows.

Which one of the following can properly be inferred from the passage?

(A) The Rialto Bridge was built on unsafe pilings.
(B) The standard of refusal was not sufficient to ensure the safety of a bridge.
(C) Da Ponte’s standard of refusal was less strict than that of other bridge builders of his day.
(D) After 1588, no bridges were built on pilings that were driven to the point of refusal.
(E) It is possible that the pilings of the Rialto Bridge could have been driven deeper even after the standard of refusal had been met.

Premise 1: Bridge solidity depends on how deep pilings are driven.
Premise 2: Prior to 1700: pilings driven to refusal level.
Premise 3: In 1588 inquiry:Builder met the contemporary standard of refusal: he had driven until additional penetration was no greater than 2 inches.
Pre phrase: Premise 1, 2 and 3 all talk about refusal level. And how a builder ensured he meet the refusal level, meaning that he could have driven deeper than refusal level.

A. No information in the passage.
B. No information in the passage.
C. Opposite information. It had met the CONTEMPORARY standard for refusal.
D. Out of scope. No information is provided "after 1588."
E. Correct. After the point of refusal the builder ensured that the additional penetration into the ground was no greater than two inches after twenty-four hammer blows.
Hence, E
_________________

If you like my posts, please give kudos. Help me unlock gmatclub tests.

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 64

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1343

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1366

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2017, 08:26
this question will appear in gmat?

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1366

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 97

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 44

Re: The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2017, 18:54
catchbharani wrote:
Go with D. Either D / E.

D . prior to 1700,pfings were driven to "refusal. Clear indicator !
E. Last line indirectly says this option.

Please post the OA.


D is obviously incorrect for the very reason you cited! The period between 1588 and 1700 is prior to 1700 and pilings were still driven to 'refusal' during that period.

A, B,and C could be true. When the question stem asks you to infer, you look for the answer choice that must be true given the information in the stimulus. E is the only answer that must be true.
_________________

Give me kudos and see what happens to your GMAT score :-)

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 44

Re: The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d   [#permalink] 16 Oct 2017, 18:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The solidity of bridge piers built on pilings depends largely on how d

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.