Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 22:24 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 22:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Tables|            
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
8,683
 [10]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 360
Kudos: 8,683
 [10]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,632
Own Kudos:
6,127
 [3]
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,632
Kudos: 6,127
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chen821122
Joined: 20 May 2024
Last visit: 05 Jul 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 2
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,632
Own Kudos:
6,127
 [1]
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,632
Kudos: 6,127
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chen821122
who knows "mode height " meaning?
­In a group of values of a measurement, the mode is the most common value. So, the mode height is the most common height.
User avatar
sagarpatelceo
Joined: 29 Jul 2020
Last visit: 07 Jun 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 315
Location: India
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shouldn't it be asked as less than Or equal to 0.20?
because it isn't less than 0.20 but it's equal to 0.20.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
hughng92
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Last visit: 05 Jan 2025
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
89
 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 66
Kudos: 89
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I made a mistake, thinking "directly proportional" the same as "positive correlation"...
User avatar
SirSanguine
Joined: 08 Jun 2022
Last visit: 13 May 2025
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V81 DI84
GPA: 4
WE:General Management (Education)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V81 DI84
Posts: 79
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray
­The table gives the types and measurements, in feet, for 20 trees that were nominated for the Big Tree Contest in a certain county. Circumference is the distance around the trunk of a tree measured 4.5 feet above the ground; height is the vertical distance from the ground to the top of the tree; and spread is the distance from the ends of the branches on one side of the tree through the trunk to the ends of the branches on the other side of the tree at the horizontal level where that distance is greatest.

Type of treeCircumferenceHeight Spread
Alder, European97041
Ash, White13.839182
Cottonwood, Eastern32.6766107.75
Elm, Siberian17.428870
Fir, Douglas8.178043
Ginko12.928576.5
Hickory, Shagbark9.757938.25
Hophornbeam4.835538.25
Locust, Honey17.33102123.5
Magnolia, Cucumber24.427583
Maple, Black16.836788
Mulberry, White18.425272
Oak, Black158596.5
Oak, Bur16.427899
Oak, Northern Red17.677982.5
Oak, Pin14.0810275.5
Pine, Scotch13.676063.5
Sweetgum, American10.085948
Sycamore, American22.0810282.25
Walnut, Black13.3310774

For each statement, select Yes if the information given indicates it is true for the trees in the table. Otherwise, select No.­­

Trunk circumference is directly proportional to height.


"Directly proportional" means "increasing together in a constant ratio."

So, if trunk circumference is directly proportional to height, as circumference increases, height will increase, and for each tree, the two will be in about the same ratio.

To check to see whether this choice is supported, we can sort by Circumference. Then, we can check to see whether height increases along with circumference.

Sorting by Circumference, we see that height does not increase along with circumference.

For example, for Fir, Douglas, circumference is 8.17, and height is 80. Then, for Alder, European, circumference is higher, at 9, but height is lower, at 70.

Checking more trees to confirm, we see that height definitely does not increase with circumference. So, we don't even have to bother checking to see whether circumference and height are in a constant ratio to determine that circumference is NOT directly proportional to height.

Select No.

The mode height is 102 feet.

To determine whether this statement is supported, sort by Height.

Having done so, we find the trees with a height of 102 and count 3 such trees.

Now, we scan the height column to see whether any other height is had by 3 or more trees. Doing so, we see that the maximum another number shows up is twice, in the cases of 79 and 85.

So, 102 is the mode.

Select Yes.

If a tree is chosen at random from the 20 trees in the table, the likelihood that it will have a circumference less than 10 feet is 0.20.

To determine the likelihood that a tree randomly selected will have a circumference less than 10 feet, we need to determine what percentage of the trees have circumferences less than 10 feet.

To do so, sort by Circumference.

Now, count the trees with circumferences less than 10 feet. We see that there are 4 such trees.

4/20 = 0.20.

So, the data support this statement.

Select Yes.

Correct answer: No, Yes, Yes

­
Hi MartyMurray,
Thank you for this clarification.

Lets take an alternate scenario where we have:

A is increasing with B almost almost always ie except for 2 instance out of 20(where it decreases despite of increase in B) do we still say its "directly proportional" or its better to say "positively corelated" or we cant say either.
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,632
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,632
Kudos: 6,127
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SirSanguine­
Hi MartyMurray,
Thank you for this clarification.

Lets take an alternate scenario where we have:

A is increasing with B almost almost always ie except for 2 instance out of 20(where it decreases despite of increase in B) do we still say its "directly proportional" or its better to say "positively corelated" or we cant say either.
In that case, we'd say "positively correlated," partly because of the two exception and partly because the fact that A increases with B does not by itself mean that A and B are directly proportional. The can increase together without their increasing values being directly proportional.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,590
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,590
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts