Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
43% (01:12) correct
57%
(01:27)
wrong
based on 7671
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.
(A) in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable
(B) in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
(C) like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable
(D) like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully
(E) such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
SC21561.01
(A) in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable
(B) in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
(C) like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable
(D) like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully
(E) such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
SC21561.01
I always don't understand this point of grammar. Gravity waves do not interact with matter like electromagnetic waves. Clarify on what this means, I think it means it does not interact with matter that is like electromagnetic waves.
Gravity waves do not interact with matter like electromagnetic waves do interact with matter.
Do you cut out the "interact with matter" part to make it more readable. Is that what people do who speak English?
You have to understand stuffed bears are foreigners like someone from Russia or India.
Gravity waves do not interact with matter like electromagnetic waves do interact with matter.
Do you cut out the "interact with matter" part to make it more readable. Is that what people do who speak English?
You have to understand stuffed bears are foreigners like someone from Russia or India.
28 Nov 2018, 20:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
dave13
Note: for straight process of elimination, scroll to the bottom of the post
in option B ? i prefered A over B Hi dave13 ,
Generally: In Option B, we are dealing with a construction called "splitting the verb." See the analysis and the link below.
• (B) - wordy and awkward? Still better than "wrong answer."
I kinda understand about the "awkward and wordy" part.
On the other hand, if you are not sure about the word "hopefully"—and many people aren't—pick "hopefully" to eliminate,
as long as the "it is hoped" option seems grammatical otherwise.
Hopefully is an adverb, this way: He looked hopefully towards the horizon, waiting for sunrise.
Hopeful is the adjective. The hopeful sailors scanned the horizon for land.
In this question, who or what is doing something "hopefully" here (is doing something in a hopeful manner)?
The electromagnetic waves?
No. Although "hopefully" is okay in informal conversation and according to some grammarians,
all the time, the GMAT does not like hopefully unless it is attached to a person doing something with hope.
(I do not think I have ever seen an official question with "hopefully" in the correct answer.)
What if a test taker is not sure whether a word in one answer is correct and the other answer
sounds wordy and awkward?
Choose the "wordy" and "awkward" answer.
"Wordy and awkward" sentences aren't great. But they aren't wrong.
• What do we call the construction or style in option B? That construction is called "splitting the verb"
You have asked a really hard question.
Style and rhetoric questions delve into difficult material. I have no doubt that you can handle it.
What you see is called "splitting the verb."
We split a helping (auxiliary) verb from the other verb and put an adverb or short adverbial phrase
to clarify, to emphasize, or to avoid awkward constructions.
Normally, adverbs in auxiliary verb-verb constructs come after the verb.
Correct: We have fixed that part already. [Do not fix that part again. Please fix a different part.]
For emphasis: We have already fixed that part. [So you should not fix it again. Please fix a different part.]
Also for emphasis: We already have fixed that part. [Before now, we fixed that part.]
In the emphasis cases, I split the auxiliary verb have from the verb fixed.
The word "already" gets the reader's or listener's attention.
Short phrases can also be inserted.
→ I just split the verb "can be" with "also"
In this case, "it is hoped" correctly splits the verb as I explain below.
One note of caution: splitting verbs with adverbs can produce confusion.
An excellent synopsis can be found HERE. The synopsis deals with splitting verbs,
as is done in "will, it is hoped, enable."
The article simplifies the whole topic and describes the possibility of confusion.
• Splitting the verb in this question
The auxiliary verb "will" is split from the main verb "enable" by the adverbial phrase it is hoped probably for two reasons:
1) to qualify, explicitly, an extraordinary assertion.
Think about seeing the formation of black holes!
The author wants to remind us that this event is not certain (clarity)
but very exciting (emphasis);
and
2) to maintain flow. Stylistically, the phrase does not work very well elsewhere.
• This phrase is common in academic English: will, it is hoped, VERB
The construction looks strange to many.
If you read enough stuffy or scientific literature, the phrase does not seem strange. (Guilty as charged.)
Other phrases that split verbs in formal prose include on occasion, in theory, and in reality.
Such splitting is allowed and often used to add particular emphasis or to avoid strange phrasing.
• Trying to move it is hoped creates problems
If we try to rewrite the sentence, to change the split verb, we run into problems.
• Rewrite #1. The sentence could be rewritten this way:
(1) It is hoped that the use of gravity waves, which do not present the problems that X do, will enable astronomers to study Y and Z.
The author wants to emphasize the importance of gravity waves' potential to allow human beings to witness the formation of black holes and neutron stars (Y and Z).
-- (S)he partly accomplishes her goal by keeping what astronomers will be able to study at the end of the sentence.
(In English, readers naturally stress the end of a sentence most of the time.)
-- The phrase's placement in (1), however, puts too much stress on "it is hoped."
There is too much stress on "it is hoped" because the sentence leads with a hypothetical—and one without an agent at that.
• So let's try a different placement of the adverbial phrase "it is hoped." Rewrite #2:
(2) The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, will enable, it is hoped, astronomers to study Y and Z.
Unless the object is long or complex, an adverb should not intrude between a verb (enable) and the verb's object (astronomers).
Now the adverb "it is hoped" is clumsy and a buttinsky.
This writer wants to talk about radical horizons.
The connection between "enable" and astronomers" is blocked.
An adverb between verb and an object is often nonsensical.
Incorrect: The team rejected summarily him during the draft pick rounds.
• Let's move the phrase again. Rewrite #3
(3) The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, it is hoped will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.
The author wants to focus on the potential for astronomers to study Y and Z.
(S)he has to qualify an assertion, but in this sentence the phrase disconnects the logical connection between waves and will enable.
Further, if we place it is hoped after the comma and before the auxiliary verb phrase, that placement suggests an antecedent of "it."
No such antecedent exists. "It" is a dummy placeholder.
The phrase draws unearned attention in this third case.
• We have a better choice of placement. The author qualifies an exciting assertion in the correct manner
by suggesting the uncertainty without harping on it.
The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.
By way of rhetorical and syntactic effect, the reader discovers an exciting prospect.
This prospect (future, declarative) WILL, it is hoped, ENABLE.
Those two capitalized words draw our attention.
The placement of "it is hoped," between a declared future and a Good Thing,
allows us to absorb a sense of measured determination. That is, the scientists are confident about but not guaranteeing a result.
Black holes and neutron stars fascinate me.
Even with many commas in its sentence, the placement of "will, it is hoped, enable" mimics a human being who waits with bated breath to see the formation of a black hole.
---------
And if none of that explanation satisfies you, rely on POE. :-D
• Process of Elimination
Split #1: LIKE is incorrect
One cue comes from a phrase in Options A and B: in the way [that].
That very phrase is a good way to test whether we should use the word AS or LIKE (in options C and D).
in the way that = AS
If in the way that works, then the word as is correct and the word like is wrong.
In comparisons, like is followed only by a noun and does not take a verb.
→ in order to remember, think "like = similar TO." Similar to what? To some noun, possibly in a noun phrase.
In the way that or describes actions—verbs!
Substitute "in the way that" for LIKE to see whether LIKE is correct.
If the sentence works with "in the way that," we are implying an action, and like should not be used.
C) . . . gravity waves, which do not interact with matter [in the way] electromagnetic waves, hopefully . . . [that substitution works. LIKE is wrong.]
D). . . gravity waves, which do not interact with matter [in the way] electromagnetic waves . . . [that substitution works. LIKE is wrong]
We have two cases of a Missing Verb.
We need AS electromagnetic waves DO.
Omit C and D
Split #2: SUCH AS is for examples, not for direct comparison.
The contrast is between gravity waves and electromagnetic waves. The latter are not an "example." The latter are the other item of comparison.
SUCH AS . . . electromagnetic waves DO is incorrect
Omit E
Split #3 - Hopefully is an adverb and things cannot act or behave hopefully.
The use of gravity waves . . . hopefully will enable
What, the gravity waves will be hopeful when those gravity waves enable astronomers to witness the formation of black holes? I don't think so.
Worse, the use of the gravity waves will behave hopefully when that use helps? No.
Correct: I hope, they hope, scientists hope (verb)
Correct: I am hopeful about the future, scientists are hopeful about the prospect of learning more about black holes (adjective)
Correct: The seasick tourist looked hopefully at the island towards which the boat was heading. (adverb)
Correct: it is hoped
Wrong: The use of gravity waves . . .hopefully will enable
-- Will the gravity waves enable in a hopeful way = hopefully?? NO
Wrong: The use of gravity waves . . . would enable, hopefully.
-- The use of gravity waves will not help hopefully. A thing cannot do something in a hopeful manner = hopefully.
Incorrect: hopefully in A, C, and E. (C and E are already gone)
Omit A.
The answer is B.
I hope that analysis helps.
Updated on: 02 Jan 2020, 14:16
Originally posted by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 26 Dec 2019, 17:01.
Last edited by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 02 Jan 2020, 14:16, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 02 Jan 2020, 14:16, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello Everyone!
Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow down our options quickly so we know how to answer questions like this when they pop up on the GMAT! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:
The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.
A. in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable
B. in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
C. like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable
D. like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully
E. such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
After a quick glance over the options, we have 2 main areas we can focus our attention on to narrow down our choices:
1. in the way / like / such as
2. hopefully will enable / will, it is hoped, enable / would enable, hopefully
Let's start with #1 on our list: in the way / like / such as. Each of these are used for different things, so we need to make sure they are used correctly in terms of both idiom structure and parallelism. To make this easier to spot, I've added in the first part of the phrase:
A. which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable = CORRECT
(compares how matter interacts with how electromagnetic waves interact, which is parallel)
B. which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable = CORRECT
(compares how matter interacts with how electromagnetic waves interact, which is parallel)
C. which do not interact with matter like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable = WRONG
(compares how matter interacts to electromagnetic waves, which is not parallel - you must compare actions to actions, not actions to things)
D. which do not interact with matter like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully = WRONG
(compares how matter interacts to electromagnetic waves, which is not parallel - you must compare actions to actions, not actions to things)
E. which do not interact with matter such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable = WRONG
("such as" is ONLY used to provide examples of something; electromagnetic waves are not an example of matter, so this doesn't work)
We can eliminate options C, D, & E because they either use the wrong idiom or use non-parallel comparisons.
Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let's explore them more closely to find their differences and consider which one is the better choice. To make problems easier to spot, let's add in the non-underlined parts:
A. The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.
This is INCORRECT because the use of "hopefully" is problematic. It's an adverb that isn't being used as an adverb, which is wrong. It actually suggests that the astronomers enabling is hopeful, not that someone else hopes that the astronomers will be enabled to study black holes and neuron stars.
B. The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.
This is CORRECT! It fixes the "hopefully" problem in option D, and uses a parallel comparison.
There you have it - option B is the correct choice!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow down our options quickly so we know how to answer questions like this when they pop up on the GMAT! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:
The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.
A. in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable
B. in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
C. like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable
D. like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully
E. such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable
After a quick glance over the options, we have 2 main areas we can focus our attention on to narrow down our choices:
1. in the way / like / such as
2. hopefully will enable / will, it is hoped, enable / would enable, hopefully
Let's start with #1 on our list: in the way / like / such as. Each of these are used for different things, so we need to make sure they are used correctly in terms of both idiom structure and parallelism. To make this easier to spot, I've added in the first part of the phrase:
A. which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable = CORRECT
(compares how matter interacts with how electromagnetic waves interact, which is parallel)
B. which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable = CORRECT
(compares how matter interacts with how electromagnetic waves interact, which is parallel)
C. which do not interact with matter like electromagnetic waves, hopefully will enable = WRONG
(compares how matter interacts to electromagnetic waves, which is not parallel - you must compare actions to actions, not actions to things)
D. which do not interact with matter like electromagnetic waves, would enable, hopefully = WRONG
(compares how matter interacts to electromagnetic waves, which is not parallel - you must compare actions to actions, not actions to things)
E. which do not interact with matter such as electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable = WRONG
("such as" is ONLY used to provide examples of something; electromagnetic waves are not an example of matter, so this doesn't work)
We can eliminate options C, D, & E because they either use the wrong idiom or use non-parallel comparisons.
Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let's explore them more closely to find their differences and consider which one is the better choice. To make problems easier to spot, let's add in the non-underlined parts:
A. The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, hopefully will enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.
This is INCORRECT because the use of "hopefully" is problematic. It's an adverb that isn't being used as an adverb, which is wrong. It actually suggests that the astronomers enabling is hopeful, not that someone else hopes that the astronomers will be enabled to study black holes and neuron stars.
B. The use of gravity waves, which do not interact with matter in the way electromagnetic waves do, will, it is hoped, enable astronomers to study the actual formation of black holes and neutron stars.
This is CORRECT! It fixes the "hopefully" problem in option D, and uses a parallel comparison.
There you have it - option B is the correct choice!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
oops 
