Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 22 Jul 2019, 01:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 282
Daboo: Sonu
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V20
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 17 Jul 2019, 10:06
1
2
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 106 sessions

60% (03:09) correct 40% (03:09) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 49 sessions

47% (01:40) correct 53% (01:14) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 49 sessions

45% (01:18) correct 55% (01:25) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Passage # 212, Date : 17-Jul-2019
This post is a part of New Project RC Butler 2019. Click here for Details


There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an indivisible shard of matter, without internal structure and without detectable shape or size. One might expect commensurate simplicity in the theories that describe such particles and the forces through which they interact; at the least, one might expect the structure of the world to be explained with a minimum number of particles and forces. Judged by this criterion of parsimony, a description of nature that has evolved in the past several years can be accounted a reasonable success. Matter is built out of just two elementary particles: the classes leptons, such as electrons, and the quarks, which make up protons, neutrons, and many related particles. Four basic forces act between the elementary particles. Gravitation and electromagnetism have long been familiar in the macroscopic world; the weak force and the strong force are observed only in subnuclear events.

An understanding of nature at this level is a remarkable achievement; nevertheless, it is possible to imagine what an even simpler theory might be like. Ideally, the two classes of elementary particles would be collapsed into one. Similarly, one force, rather than four, might explain all the particles' interactions. An ambitious new theory now promises at least a partial unification along these lines. The theory does not embrace gravitation, which is by far the feeblest of the forces and may be fundamentally different from the others. If gravitation is excluded, however, the theory unifies all elementary particles and forces.

The first step in constructing the unified theory was demonstrating that the weak, the strong, and the electromagnetic forces could all be described by theories of the same general type. During this development, a deep connection was discovered between the weak force and electromagnetism, a connection that hinted at still grander synthesis. The new theory incorporated the leptons and the quarks into a single family and showed that one type of particle can transform into the other. At the same time the weak, the strong, and the electromagnetic forces are understood as aspects of a single underlying force. Thus, the theory is a model of frugality.
1. The author organizes the passage by

A) enumerating distinctions among several different kinds of elementary particles
B) stating a criterion for judging theories of nature, and using it to evaluate two theories
C) explaining three methods of grouping particles and forces
D) criticizing an inaccurate view of elemental nature and proposing an alternative approach
E) outlining an assumption about scientific verification, then criticizing the assumption


2. According to the passage, which of the following is true of quarks?

I. They are the elementary building blocks of neutrons.
II. Scientists have described them as having no internal structure.
III. Some scientists group them with leptons in a single class of particles.

A) I only
B) III only
C) I and II only
D) II and III only
E) I, II, and III


3. It can be inferred that the author would be likely to consider a new theory of nature superior to present theories if it were to

A) account for a larger number of macroscopic structures than present theories
B) reduce the four basic forces to two more fundamental, incompatible forces
C) propose a smaller number of fundamental particles and forces than current theories
D) successfully account for the observable behavior of bodies due to gravity
E) hypothesize that protons but not neutrons are formed by combinations of more fundamental particles


_________________
You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come.

Give Kudos if you like my post

Originally posted by daboo343 on 04 Jun 2017, 08:26.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 17 Jul 2019, 10:06, edited 3 times in total.
Updated.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Mar 2015
Posts: 14
Re: There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2017, 10:27
Answered this question in 2 min and 40 seconds.

It is B.
CR Forum Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Posts: 613
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2018, 08:48
Hi workout

Please reformat the passage.

Thanks!
_________________
Please give kudos if you found my posts helpful!

Project CR Butler - 2 CR's everyday
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 90
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
Re: There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2018, 20:40
An RC passage should have more questions to practice else it doesn't make sense to read the passage and answer the question.It becomes CR question rather than RC passage.
Tuck School Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: Valar Dohaeris
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 304
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V37
Reviews Badge
Re: There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2019, 01:32
1
Hi workout
please add the following questions to this passage
According to the passage, which of the following is true of quarks?
I. They are the elementary building blocks of neutrons.
II. Scientists have described them as having no internal structure.
III. Some scientists group them with leptons in a single class of particles.
A) I only
B) III only
C) I and II only
D) II and III only
E) I, II, and III


It can be inferred that the author would be likely to consider a new theory of nature superior to present theories if it were to
A) account for a larger number of macroscopic structures than present theories
B) reduce the four basic forces to two more fundamental, incompatible forces
C) propose a smaller number of fundamental particles and forces than current theories
D) successfully account for the observable behavior of bodies due to gravity
E) hypothesize that protons but not neutrons are formed by combinations of more fundamental particles

_________________
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 21 May 2017
Posts: 103
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 22:24
PeepalTree wrote:
Hi workout
please add the following questions to this passage
According to the passage, which of the following is true of quarks?
I. They are the elementary building blocks of neutrons.
II. Scientists have described them as having no internal structure.
III. Some scientists group them with leptons in a single class of particles.
A) I only
B) III only
C) I and II only
D) II and III only
E) I, II, and III


It can be inferred that the author would be likely to consider a new theory of nature superior to present theories if it were to
A) account for a larger number of macroscopic structures than present theories
B) reduce the four basic forces to two more fundamental, incompatible forces
C) propose a smaller number of fundamental particles and forces than current theories
D) successfully account for the observable behavior of bodies due to gravity
E) hypothesize that protons but not neutrons are formed by combinations of more fundamental particles




PeepalTree: Please provide the answers to the above questions
Tuck School Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: Valar Dohaeris
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 304
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V37
Reviews Badge
Re: There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 23:37
zac123 wrote:
PeepalTree wrote:
Hi workout
please add the following questions to this passage
According to the passage, which of the following is true of quarks?
I. They are the elementary building blocks of neutrons.
II. Scientists have described them as having no internal structure.
III. Some scientists group them with leptons in a single class of particles.
A) I only
B) III only
C) I and II only
D) II and III only
E) I, II, and III


It can be inferred that the author would be likely to consider a new theory of nature superior to present theories if it were to
A) account for a larger number of macroscopic structures than present theories
B) reduce the four basic forces to two more fundamental, incompatible forces
C) propose a smaller number of fundamental particles and forces than current theories
D) successfully account for the observable behavior of bodies due to gravity
E) hypothesize that protons but not neutrons are formed by combinations of more fundamental particles




PeepalTree: Please provide the answers to the above questions


hey!
Check the spoiler tag, answers are there.
_________________
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Posts: 268
Re: There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2019, 07:06
1
u1983 SajjadAhmad workout please add the questions mentioned in one of the previous post those questions came in my Kaplan mock
Senior RC Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: ----__----___-----____-----
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 3079
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
Re: There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2019, 10:07
+1 Kudos to posts containing answer explanation of all questions
_________________
New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Final days of the GMAT Exam? => All GMAT Flashcards.
This Post Helps = Press +1 Kudos
Best of Luck on the GMAT!!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 7
There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2019, 12:22
1
1
3 minutes in reading and 4 minutes in answering the questions.

Answer 1:
A) enumerating distinctions among several different kinds of elementary particles : No such distinctions are presented in the passage. We only know the class they belong to
B) stating a criterion for judging theories of nature, and using it to evaluate two theories
C) explaining three methods of grouping particles and forces : There are just two methods described. One is the existing one and the other is the proposed /proffered one
D) criticizing an inaccurate view of elemental nature and proposing an alternative approach : the author does not criticize, rather he applauds. "An understanding of nature at this level is a remarkable achievement; "
E) outlining an assumption about scientific verification, then criticizing the assumption: The author does not criticize. no clear assumption is stated

Therefore option B


Answer 2:

I. They are the elementary building blocks of neutrons.
II. Scientists have described them as having no internal structure.
III. Some scientists group them with leptons in a single class of particles.

I-mentioned in the para 1. Matter is built out of just two elementary particles: the classes leptons, such as electrons, and the quarks, which make up protons, neutrons,
II- mentioned in para 1.elementary particle: it is an indivisible shard of matter, without internal structure and without detectable shape or size.
III- mentioned in paragraph 1. Matter is built out of just two elementary particles: the classes leptons, such as electrons, and the quarks, which make up protons, neutrons,

Therefore option E


Answer 3:

All other options except C and D should be easy to eliminate.
Option D is not correct since the author does not seem to indicate whether he considers the force of gravity on bodies to be an important factor in the qualification of a theory. All that is mentioned in the passage is "successfully account for the observable behavior of bodies due to gravity "
The author only seems to be interested in unifying the forces into one category and all particles into another

Therefore option C wins
GMAT Club Bot
There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind   [#permalink] 18 Jul 2019, 12:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

There can be nothing simpler than an elementary particle: it is an ind

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





cron

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne