Hi everyone,
Got all correct in 7:30 minutes, including 2:55 minute to read and 4:35 minutes to answer the questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------P1in paragraph one the author presents a new sound intended to be heard just by young people. Then the author proceeds by presenting 2 usages: for the grownups not to be disturbed by young people, and for young people to receive text messages in class without the professor knowing.
Purpose: to present a new sound and its usages
P2Here the author claims that one of the intended usage of the sound might not efficiently work.
Purpose: to claim that one of the usage might backfire
Main pointTo present a new sound, its usages and the drawback of one usage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. The primary purpose of the passage is to:
Pre-thinking
Main point question
To present a new sound, its usages and the drawback of one usage.
A.
Criticize the obsession of today's youth with technology.
B.
Encourage media outlets to support this new cell phone ring tone.
C. Describe the
technical specs of this new ring tone.
D. Encourage
further rebellion amongst today's youth.
E. Introduce a new ilk of technology and initiate a discussion of its true efficacy.
In line with pre-thinking ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Why is it important to note the "highly uncharacteristic embrace of anarchy" by the Times?
Pre-thinking
function question
Let's evaluate the options
A. The deviation from the norm of the publication calls even more attention to the new technology by piquing readers' attention. there is no reason to eliminate this option so far.
B. Such a prevalent publication's encouragement of anarchy could be perceived by the government as a serious threat. government is not mentioned and this option is out of scope
C. It suggests that it is being used ironically by the Times to actually express disapproval. we have no element to infer this option
D. It is likely an advertising ploy by the maker of the ring tone to gain sales. too extreme and out of scope
E. Older adults need to be worried about the increasingly aggressive tactics of youth. again we do not have elements to infer this option, which is also out of scope
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. What is the author trying to convey by describing young people as "hooligans, yobs, scamps, ne'er-do-wells, scapegraces, ruffians, tosspots, and bravos"?
Pre-thinking
Function question
Well, all of these terms are quite insulting.
A. The opinion that, whatever name you call them by, young people will continue to disturb business transactions. too extreme. Plus we don't know if young people will persevere in disturbing business transactions
B. An insulting tone implying the ignorance of youth. quite close to pre-thinking but i would say that this option falls into the category of half correct-half wrong. There is no element that we can use to claim that young people are ignorant. They may be lazy, good to do nothing and so on but nothing that points at their knowledge can be seen in the passage
C. That all young people can be generalized into one of these descriptive groups. too extreme
D. A sense of criticism on the part of older adults who feel patronizing toward young people. correct. And for those who don't know the meaning of patronizing: to speak to or behave towards someone as if they are stupid or not important
E. Support for embracing jargon when communicating between people of a different generation incorrect
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It's a great day to be alive!