Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:38 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:38
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3 
555-605 Level|   Modifiers|   Parallelism|                  
User avatar
waytowharton
User avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2021
Last visit: 16 Sep 2025
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
18
Given Kudos: 409
Posts: 130
Kudos: 18
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 04 Apr 2022, 00:18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks a lot KarishmaB, the explanation above was really very helpful. I have one follow-up question which is as below -
1. Is there some rule that sentence construction Subject V1 and V2 construction is better than Subject Verb1, and Same subject Verb2? I read it somewhere and basis that i selected option A over D. If this rule is rule, then what is the methodology you follow to select the answer between 2 options. Option A has 2 slight errors - 'her' redundant and modifier, 'long before it was fashionable', with state instead of action; Option D has slightly poor construction - S1 V1, and S1 V2.

Lastly madam, I am a big fan oy yours. Your explanation to answers have helped me a lot. I will be appearing for exam by end of month and will keep you posted.
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [2]
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 04 Apr 2022, 01:18
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
waytowharton
Thanks a lot KarishmaB, the explanation above was really very helpful. I have one follow-up question which is as below -
1. Is there some rule that sentence construction Subject V1 and V2 construction is better than Subject Verb1, and Same subject Verb2? I read it somewhere and basis that i selected option A over D. If this rule is rule, then what is the methodology you follow to select the answer between 2 options. Option A has 2 slight errors - 'her' redundant and modifier, 'long before it was fashionable', with state instead of action; Option D has slightly poor construction - S1 V1, and S1 V2.

Lastly madam, I am a big fan oy yours. Your explanation to answers have helped me a lot. I will be appearing for exam by end of month and will keep you posted.
Show more

Yes, especially when the clauses are short, "subject verb1 and verb2" is a better construction. But here, "she" is in the non-underlined part so no option can change it. At least the "she" - subject of second clause corresponds to J - subject of first clause in option (D). Considering the underlined part, option (D) is perfect while option (A) has issues.

Best wishes for your upcoming exam!
User avatar
BLTN
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2020
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
255
Given Kudos: 216
Posts: 242
Kudos: 255
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 03 Nov 2022, 05:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
AliciaSierra

I have silly doubt about this sentence. Is "Paris was her home long before Paris was fashionable to be an expatriate" correct sentence/English ?

No, that's not correct, for a few reasons, for one because the city Paris cannot be "an expatriate" (only people could be). But I think I see why you're asking. In the sentence "Paris was her home long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate," the "it" does not refer to "Paris". This is an example of what is sometimes called the "empty 'it' ", where the "it" doesn't refer to anything in particular, and is just used to talk about the general circumstances. We use "it" that way very often, for example in a sentence like "it is raining".
Show more

Dear IanStewart
am I right that the reason to eliminate "C" is misplaced modifier "expatriate", which modifies Paris?
I have not seen the rule: "to + Verb" as an introductory of noun clause, yet I have doubt that such structure is wrong. For instance, is the following correct?
- To get high score relies on how strong your skills and mental health are.

Could you elaborate on "to + verb" as a noun.

Thanks beforehand.
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,985
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,985
 [2]
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 03 Nov 2022, 05:55
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BLTN

Dear IanStewart
am I right that the reason to eliminate "C" is misplaced modifier "expatriate", which modifies Paris?
I have not seen the rule: "to + Verb" as an introductory of noun clause, yet I have doubt that such structure is wrong. For instance, is the following correct?
- To get high score relies on how strong your skills and mental health are.
Show more

"Expatriate" isn't a modifier in C, so that's not the issue there.

Answer C here seems technically fine to me, but it's very awkward writing. It reads like the words are in the wrong order, because the sentence really means to describe when it was "fashionable to be an expatriate", so answer C becomes confusing when "expatriate" comes before "fashionable". I say it's technically correct, because we can use infinitive verb forms ("to + [verb]") as noun subjects of a sentence, but it's much more common to use gerunds ("[verb] + -ing"). So these sentences are both grammatically fine:

To dance is fun.
Dancing is fun.

but the second sentence, using the gerund "dancing", is the version you would almost always see. It depends on the sentence, but using these "to+verb" constructions as a subject usually sounds overly formal and strange. Rewording your sentence slightly, you could say "To get a high score requires hard work", and that wouldn't be too unusual of a sentence (grammatically it's fine), but it would be much more common to say "Getting a high score requires hard work". Because of that, in the original question, answer C would be slightly improved if "to be" was replaced with "being", but it still would have the word order issue I mentioned above. The structure of choices D and E is different from that in C, and in those answer choices, only "to be" makes sense, as I assume has been explained in earliers posts.
User avatar
JaydeepPatadiya
User avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2022
Last visit: 23 Mar 2023
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 6
Kudos: 3
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 10 Dec 2022, 01:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Experts,

I understand that choice D in this question is correct and others are incorrect but I rejected choice D because of below reason. I want to understand if my thought process from meaning perspective is correct.

Original sentense sequence of events are:
First - JB considered Paris her home
Second - Living in Paris as expat became Fashion
Third - She remained in France during WW2...(meaning WW2 happened after it became fashion to live in Paris as expat).

According to Choice D, the sequence of events are:
First: JB considered Paris her home, and she remained in France during WW2...(both actions happened in parallel before it became fashion to live in Paris as expat)
Second: It became fashion to live in Paris as expat.

I rejected choice D (although I know gramatically its the correct choice) because this choice changes the sequence of events. I have noticed that for 700+ questions the answer choice that looks very straightforward often remains incorrect. This was the other reason for rejecting choice D.
User avatar
TargetKellogg2024
User avatar
MBA Section Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 442
Own Kudos:
732
Given Kudos: 159
Location: Germany
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 2: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GRE 1: Q170 V163
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GRE 1: Q170 V163
Posts: 442
Kudos: 732
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 23 Dec 2022, 06:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Apart from the awkwardness, is there anything else that makes option C incorrect?
I read that the structure of option C is - Clause 1 + Modifier + Clause 2 and hence it is incorrect. Is it always the case that we need to keep the clauses as close as possible? If so, is it true only for 'AND' conjunction or for all the conjunctions as well? Please explain with examples. Thanks!

cc: GMATNinja
User avatar
Piotrek
User avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Last visit: 27 Apr 2024
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 17
Kudos: 3
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 21 Jan 2023, 03:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey guys,

Could you elaborate a little bit on KarishmaB explanation? More specifically I want to ask about B.

1. What is double stacked phrase?
2. When is it necessary?
3. Why we can't use it here?

Below you will find what KarishmaB wrote about it.

(B) For Josephine Baker, long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate, Paris was her home

The double stacked phrases ("for J..." and "long before it was...") are not suitable if not really necessary hence will avoid this option.
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [3]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [3]
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 23 Jan 2023, 00:16
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Piotrek
hey guys,

Could you elaborate a little bit on KarishmaB explanation? More specifically I want to ask about B.

1. What is double stacked phrase?
2. When is it necessary?
3. Why we can't use it here?

Below you will find what KarishmaB wrote about it.

(B) For Josephine Baker, long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate, Paris was her home

The double stacked phrases ("for J..." and "long before it was...") are not suitable if not really necessary hence will avoid this option.
Show more

While using a modifier, we try to place the noun/verb etc. that it modifies close to it. When I want to tell you something about someone, I would like to tell you who that someone is as soon as possible for clarity. The communication should be as clear as possible.

Now look at this:

For a while, Anthony, the most intelligent boy in the class, thought that he would be made the class President.

'for a while' is a prepositional adverbial modifier modifying the verb 'thought'. He thought so for a while (answers 'how long?')
'the most intelligent boy in the class' is an appositive modifying Anthony.
This sentence is acceptable because when we mention the subject 'Anthony' after 'for a while', we know that 'for a while' is modifying the verb that will appear next. The appositive after 'Anthony' is ignored in our mind and we connect 'for a while' with 'thought.'

We can move the modifiers around.

For a while, the most intelligent boy in the class, Anthony thought that he would be made the class President.
Here the two modifiers are stacked (one on top of the other) and we have lost the 'for a while' and 'thought' connection. After 'for a while,' we have another modifier and now we don't know what is being referred to by which modifier. So we shouldn't put one modifier on top of another until and unless they are both modifying the same thing. Even then, we prefer to not stack them, if possible.
such as 'The most intelligent boy in the class, my favourite brother, Anthony thought that he would be made the class President.'
Both modifiers are stacked. It would be better to re-write this as:
'The most intelligent boy in the class, Anthony, my favourite brother, thought that he would be made the class President.'
Anthony is the subject and the two modifiers are around it.
Or we could rewrite it as 'The most intelligent boy in the class and my favourite brother, Anthony thought that he would be made the class President.'
In effect, there is only one modifier 'The most intelligent boy in the class and my favourite brother' and that is modifying Anthony.
There are many other ways of writing this, of course.

The most intelligent boy in the class, Anthony thought that he would be made the class President for a while.
Here 'for a while' seems to be modifying the closer verb 'made'. So it looks like he would be made class President for a while. So this is not acceptable.

The most intelligent boy in the class, Anthony thought, for a while, that he would be made the class President.
This is fine. Each modifier is modifying what it should.

Often, it may not be about what is correct, what is not. It may be about getting the best possible option (the one that makes things clear).

P. S. - If you tag me (by putting '@' front of my username), I would myself be able to help.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 26 Jan 2023, 12:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TargetKellogg2024
Apart from the awkwardness, is there anything else that makes option C incorrect?
I read that the structure of option C is - Clause 1 + Modifier + Clause 2 and hence it is incorrect. Is it always the case that we need to keep the clauses as close as possible? If so, is it true only for 'AND' conjunction or for all the conjunctions as well? Please explain with examples. Thanks!

cc: GMATNinja
Show more
Yeah, (C) isn't terrible. There are a couple of good posts discussing those options earlier in the thread. I don't have much to add to these regarding the difference between "to be an expatriate was fashionable" vs. "it was fashionable to be an expatriate":


You could argue that putting the "long before" modifier up front makes the meaning a bit clearer because it gives the reader the important context right away. By the time we get to the subject (Josephine Baker) in (D), we already know, "okay, Josephine did something before it was fashionable to do so..." And what was that something? Making Paris her home.

In contrast, (C) starts with the independent clause, without any context. So before we get to the "long before" part, we're thinking, "okay, great, she made Paris her home -- that's a fun fact, but who cares?" Then we read the "long before" part and figure it out, but all of that is a little bit confusing, since (C) requires a bit more effort and concentration on the reader's part.

I wouldn't overreact to that issue, but it gives us one very tiny vote in favor of (D) over (C).

So yeah, there's not much to go by here. It's a tough decision and one that doesn't really have any interesting or useful takeaways, and it's also a very old question. So if you aren't convinced, don't worry too much about it! :)
User avatar
adgarg
User avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2023
Last visit: 21 Dec 2024
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Posts: 28
Kudos: 3
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 21 Feb 2023, 17:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ExpertsGlobal5
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
jimmyjamesdonkey
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate, and she remained in France during the Second World War as a performer and an intelligence agent for the Resistance

(A) To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate

A: This answer choice fails to maintain parallelism between "Paris was her home..." and "she remained in France..."; remember, any elements linked by a conjunction ("and" in this case) must be parallel. Further, Option A uses the needlessly wordy and indirect construction "To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

Show more

Can you please tell that if both "was" and "remained" are past tense verbs, than how is it not parallel in verbs already?
User avatar
bv8562
User avatar
Joined: 01 Dec 2020
Last visit: 01 Oct 2025
Posts: 423
Own Kudos:
489
Given Kudos: 360
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Posts: 423
Kudos: 489
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 21 Mar 2023, 06:39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja In options A and B, can the introductory phrases "To Josephine Baker" and "For Josephine Baker" modify both the clauses?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [3]
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 27 Mar 2023, 07:28
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bv8562
[url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D In options A and B, can the introductory phrases "To Josephine Baker" and "For Josephine Baker" modify both the clauses?
Show more
In theory, there's no reason why a prepositional modifier such as "to" or "for" couldn't modify the following clause or clauses, but the phrases "to Josephine Baker" and "for Josephine Baker" don't make sense here.

Often, if I begin a sentence with the phrase "To [some person]" or "for [some person] the following clause will be something this person believes:

    "To Tim, the Sixers have no hope of winning a title, because their coach likes to run injury-prone players into the ground."

Here, we get information about what Tim believes about the prospects of a basketball team. Makes sense.

But in the SC question, it doesn't make sense to write that Josephine Baker believed Paris was her home, because we know that she lived there. It WAS her home. No opinions needed!

All to say: sure, an opening modifier can potentially describe more than one clause. There's no rule about that. But context will tell us whether that modification is clear and logical. Here, it isn't. Simple as that.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
bv8562
User avatar
Joined: 01 Dec 2020
Last visit: 01 Oct 2025
Posts: 423
Own Kudos:
489
Given Kudos: 360
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Posts: 423
Kudos: 489
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 27 Mar 2023, 08:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
bv8562
[url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D In options A and B, can the introductory phrases "To Josephine Baker" and "For Josephine Baker" modify both the clauses?
In theory, there's no reason why a prepositional modifier such as "to" or "for" couldn't modify the following clause or clauses, but the phrases "to Josephine Baker" and "for Josephine Baker" don't make sense here.

Often, if I begin a sentence with the phrase "To [some person]" or "for [some person] the following clause will be something this person believes:

    "To Tim, the Sixers have no hope of winning a title, because their coach likes to run injury-prone players into the ground."

Here, we get information about what Tim believes about the prospects of a basketball team. Makes sense.

But in the SC question, it doesn't make sense to write that Josephine Baker believed Paris was her home, because we know that she lived there. It WAS her home. No opinions needed!

All to say: sure, an opening modifier can potentially describe more than one clause. There's no rule about that. But context will tell us whether that modification is clear and logical. Here, it isn't. Simple as that.

I hope that helps!
Show more

As you said above that both the phrases "to Josephine Baker" and "for Josephine Baker" don't make sense here, so can I eliminate these choices based on this criteria? Will it be a valid reason?
User avatar
AstaUzumaki
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2021
Last visit: 20 Sep 2024
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 161
Schools: Kenan-Flagler '26 (A)
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V40
Schools: Kenan-Flagler '26 (A)
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 37
Kudos: 8
To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable 01 Jul 2023, 12:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Do two clauses have to have a similar structure for them to be parallel?
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts