topper97
A recent survey done in the US shows that, in 2013, child penalty – the amount by which women’s earnings
fall behind men after they become mothers – alone was responsible for the entire difference between the incomes of men and women and the women who had working mothers tended to suffer less in terms of child penalties.
(A)
falls [???] behind those of men after they become mothers – alone was responsible for the entire difference between the incomes of men and women and [
THAT] the women who had
(B) fall behind those of men after they become mothers – alone was responsible for the entire difference between the incomes of men and women and that the women who had
(C)
falls behind those of men after they become mothers – alone was responsible for the entire difference between the incomes of men and women
, and that the women who had
(D) fall
behind men after they become mothers – alone was responsible for the entire difference between the incomes of men and women and the women who had
(E) fall
behind men after they become mothers – alone was responsible for the entire difference between the incomes of men and women
, and that the women who
areThe meaning of this sentence is hard to find.
I ditched the meaning for a bit because differences between and among options are very slight.
Once I found the right answer through splits, or was faced with A and B only, the meaning became clearer.
How to eliminate? The differences are small. Find them.
Split #1: PARALELLISM - missing pronoun for earnings -
fell behind those of men or
fell behind menWomen's earnings fell . . . behind
men?
Men is a noun that has nothing to do with the noun
earnings.
Earnings did not fall behind
men.
A bunch of women's paychecks did not drop down behind a line of men or fail to keep pace with men.
We need
those of to maintain parallelism.
Earnings of women . . . fell behind earnings [those] of men.
Eliminate options D and E
Split #2: Subject/verb agreement
Subject in the first that clause is earnings. Verb should be plural FALL.
Eliminate C. (Maybe A. I cannot tell.)
If A should say "FALLS," then we are finished.
Eliminate C and A.
The answer is B
If A does not use the incorrect FALL, then
Split #3: THAT vs. no THATAssuming that A actually should say FALL, the only different between options A and B is the word
that.
A does not contain a second THAT and B does.
In this case, we need the second THAT.
We need the second part of the second IC to refer back to "study shows THAT."
One way to start? If we see a THAT clause plus an AND, we should look for another THAT clause.
We use the THAT to tie the second clause, which is very far away from the verb
found, back to the verb
foundA survey shows two things:
(1) THAT a "child penalty" occurs
after women have children.
After women have children, that fact alone explains the difference
between women's incomes and men's incomes.
(2) THAT women whose own mothers had worked "tended to suffer less in terms of child penalties."
Presumably these women knew what they were up again prior to the fact.
Without a second THAT, option A sounds like babble.
"the women who had working mothers" is not connected to the explanation, namely, that the mere fact
of having children explains the entire difference between women's and men's incomes.
Once we attach THAT to "the women who had working mothers," though, the phrase refers back to the study's findings, and
that construction makes sense.
BTW, I think option B should say "the women who
had had working mothers. . . ."
What, if the mother and grandmother are both working, the mother has an easier time?
Doubtful.
The experience of having had a working mother taught the women who did better
that those women were in for a tough ride. Those women were more prepared.
In any event, option B is the best of the lot.
Answer BExtras
• Option E: women who are [working mothers tended to suffer less in terms of child penalties.]
Given the first part of the sentence, that logic is absurd. Eliminate E.
• COMMAS in C and E probably should not be there
The study [single subject] shows THAT [clause 1] and THAT [clause 2]
We have a single subject whose verb has two direct objects [shows that (1) child penalty is X and that (2) women who had Y do better].
We usually should not split the objects with a comma, especially if the objects are dependent clauses.
I would not worry about this issue.
Just as is the case in official questions, the options that contain commas (C and E)
contain other errors.