1)
An inference question in a disguised ―All...EXCEPT‖ format. Either eliminate three
choices that must follow from the passage or look for something that doesn‘t
necessarily or cannot follow. (C) contradicts the author‘s suggestion that the
country being written about is highly educated, ―making equal pretensions to
natural intelligence and progress in education.‖
(A): Opposite. This is a valid inference based on the author‘s point in ¶6 that very
many in the country have emigrated from other countries.
(B): Opposite. The author describes in ¶1 a ―youthful country...in which nature
unveils her most majestic forms to exalt and inspire.‖
(C): The correct answer
(D): Opposite. The author argues in ¶3 that ―few possess the wealth and leisure
necessary to enable devotion of time or thought to the study of poetry...‖
which implies a relatively low standard of living.
(E): Opposite. This can be inferred from the passage.
Strategy Point:
Note how much the passage tells you, and how much it doesn't. Although the
author could be describing the U.S., he or she never states such. Therefore don't
fill in the blanks with your own perceptions of the U.S.
2)
A detail question: Review your map to get a feel for the reasons the author gives
for the country‘s indifference to poetry. RN I is difficult to decipher in that it
requires knowledge of what ―edification‖ means. If you don‘t know, guess or move
on to the next Roman Numeral! ―Edification‖ means instruction or enlightenment,
and the author does in fact argue that the country‘s population is unenlightened, as
described at the end of ¶2 and the beginning of ¶3. RN II may be tempting from aquick review of ¶6, but distorts the author‘s argument. The author argues that in
spite of the new country‘s quality poetry, immigrants read old world poetry because
of nostalgia. The issue isn‘t quality, but homesickness. There‘s no need to evaluate
RN III at this point unless you skipped RN I. RN III is correct for the same reasons
that RN II is wrong: immigrants are reading their homeland‘s poetry because of
nostalgia.
(A): Opposite. See above.
(B): Opposite. See above.
(C): The correct answer
(D): Opposite. See above.
(E): Opposite. See above.
3)
An application question. Predict by reviewing what the author considers true poetry
to be. The author argues in ¶4 that it‘s not ―fanciful or contrived,‖ but that it
requires ―sustained application to...craft that is essential for artistic excellence.‖
Look for an answer choice that fits with this idea of poetry. (A) most closely fits,
describing poetry that can be edited and made better, but that can‘t be artificially
contrived from the start.
(A): The correct answer
(B): Opposite. Though the author believes that poetry must be uncontrived, it‘s
also made clear that good poetry requires a lot of work to perfect. This
answer choice suggests the opposite.
(C): Out of Scope. The author discusses poetry that is tied to a particular country,
but says nothing about poetry tied to a particular time.
(D): Opposite. This description of poetry would likely be something the author
would label as contrived, and therefore more in keeping with misconceptions
of poetry than with what ―true‖ poetry is.
(E): Incorrect, as described in A.