*Note - The passage was a bit dense to read. Whenever I encounter such passages, I try to keep track of the overall objective of the author. Having said that, I still had to read the passage twice.
Answers are in
bold.
1. The "abyss" referred to by Simmel (Highlighted) is best defined as
A. a deed that is both exciting and dangerousB. the ultimate punishment established for telling a secret
C. the gap between early models of secrecy and his approach
D. the distance between two people that is bridged by sharing a secret
E. a feature of the topography in Western Africa
Explanation of question 1This was the easiest of the lot. The meaning of the word abyss means its a very long well/hole, stretching almost endlessly. In the context of the passage Simmel used it as a "moral badness". I would also like to point out to this part - "a desire for revelation, regardless of consequence". Now this to me is exciting ([desire for revelation) and dangerous (regardless of consequence) is nothing but choice A.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Based on the passage, which of the following situations would most clearly violate the rules of a Kpelle secret society?
A. A foreign scholar publishes a book about the organization of Kpelle secret societies
B. A woman claims she knows the details of mens initiation ritualsC. A man learns the ritual knowledge of a women's secret society
D. Two women are overheard discussing the identities of their secret society's "spirits"
E. A secret is passed on with the words "don't tell anyone, but..."
Explanation of question 2Before we start to answer this, let quickly go through the passage where the author was referring to Kpelle and find out what is clearly a No No for this secret society. o two things come in light, - 1. that initiated members do not say secrets to non-member, 2. secrets - you may not speak of it (so even if you are a non-member you may not speak of it). Now lets go to the choices -
A - The scholar publishes book about the Kpelle, not specifically about Kpelle's secrets.
B - When a woman (member or non-member) is claiming, she is basically saying it out loud. #2 rule is 'you may not speak of it'. Bad woman! This is in clear violation of the the rule. This is a strong choice, we keep this in.
C - Ok, man learns the ritual of women's secret society. Not great, but as long as he does not blurt it out we are okay as per the rules of Kpelle.
D - Alright, this is a tough one. There are various possibilities, 1. both women are members but the one overhearing is not, 2. both women are members and the one overhearing is also a member, 3. one of the woman telling the other is a non-member, and overhearing person is non-member....etc. Now there is a possibility here that we have all people concerned are members of the society (possibility #2). So I guess it is possibly not violating the Kpelle rule.
E - 'You may not speak of it' is only the translation of the Kpelle word secret. Actually there is no mention if this is how secrets can be passed along with context to the passage.
Strongest choice would be B.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. From the information in this passage, the author would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements?
A. Secrets contain personal information but lies can be about anything.
B. The best social scientists' work must contain no contradictions.
C. All Kpelle adults know the secrets of the secret societies.
D. Sociologically, how people behave is at least as important as what they know.E. It is impossible to eliminate a moral dimension from the concept of secrets.
Explanation of question 3A - Author might agree with Simmel here that secrets can be anything, not just a type of information. Out.
B - Is it even talked about in this passage? Wait let me check...... (30 sec later)... No, confirmed! Out.
C - All adults? Even the ones not initiated? Non-members? Are all adults members of Kpelle secret society? Surely not - where would be the exclusivity then!

. Its like - Sir, would you like to be one of our EXCLUSIVE members of this exquisite golf club, ohh and fyi every single last one in town are members!!
D - I would like to quote the last line of the passage here - "Bellman's realization shows that the mechanism of Kpelle secrecy relies on Simmel's model: the importance of keeping of secrets (nondisclosure) as a social act with rules and consequences carries the burden of morality rather than the personal, internal knowledge of the content of the secret." This morality of secret keeping is quite important in the context of sociology, at least as important as the information it contains.
E - Impossible? Well according to Simmel the secrets should be morally neutral. So although in some instances there might be a moral dimension to the concept of secret keeping, I think 'impossible' is a strong word here. Out.