AnirudhaS
Hi
SajjadAhmad, can we have the official explanations please?
Official Explanation
1. The passage is primarily concerned with
Difficulty Level: Medium
Explanation
This is a primary purpose question, as indicated by the phrase primarily concerned with. The subject of the question is the passage as a whole. The task of the question is to determine why the author wrote the passage. In order to answer the question, determine why the author wrote the passage, then evaluate the answer choices, eliminating any choice which does not match the author’s primary purpose. According to the passage, sociologists Rodney Stark and Robert Wuthnow differ both stylistically and substantially in their respective approaches to the contentious question of the extent to which secularization has taken hold within contemporary American culture and has influenced religious practice. The author then critiques the work of both sociologists.
Choice A: No. The phrase two competing perspectives on an important sociological question may make this choice seem tempting, but it is a memory trap reminiscent of the first sentence of the passage which states prominent sociologists Rodney Stark and Robert Wuthnow differ both stylistically and substantially in their respective approaches to the contentious question of the extent to which secularization has taken hold within contemporary American culture and has influenced religious practice. While the two sociologists differ in the styles of their approaches, Stark mounts a blunt attack on the basic secularization thesis and Wuthnow’s analysis is missing any decisive refutation of the secularization thesis, there is no evidence in the passage to support the idea that their approaches are competing. Therefore, this is a no such comparison answer choice.
Choice B: No. The recycled language readers' assumptions may make this choice seem appealing because the passage states that Stark compellingly challenges readers’ convictions concerning any overarching religious decline. However, the same is not true of Wuthnow, who leaves his readers’ secularist assumptions unchallenged. Further, this is not the primary purpose of the passage which is to critique the works of sociologists Stark and Wuthnow regarding the contentious question regarding secularization and its influence on religious practice.
Choice C: No. The word criticizing is extreme language and one sociologist's approach is not the primary purpose of the passage which is to critique the works of sociologists Stark and Wuthnow regarding the contentious question regarding secularization and its influence on religious practice.
Choice D: Correct. This answer choice is supported by the passage as the author evaluates the writings of two sociologists, Stark and Wuthnow, in relationship to a controversial topic, which the passage refers to as a contentious question of the extent to which secularization has taken hold within contemporary American culture and has influenced religious practice.
Choice E: No. The recycled language developments and religion and culture may make this choice seem appealing. However, the primary purpose of the passage is not to explain new developments since no specific new developments are addressed. The purpose is to critique the works of sociologists Stark and Wuthnow regarding the contentious question regarding secularization and its influence on religious practice.
The correct answer is choice D.
2. The author cites the emergence of increasing religious and cultural diversity in order to
Difficulty Level: Very Hard
Explanation
The phrase in order to in the question stem indicates that this is a purpose question. The subject of the question is the emergence of increasing religious and cultural diversity. The task of the question is indicated by the words author cites…in order to. To answer the question, determine why the author mentioned the subject, then evaluate the answer choices, eliminating any choice which does not match the author’s purpose. The passages states that Wuthnow’s cautious account of various transformations in American religious life, by contrast, provides an evenhanded depiction of several critical cultural developments, such as the decentralizing of traditional denominational divisions in favor of a more prominent and more polarizing division between liberal and conservative movements. He properly links this division, which emerged in the 1940s and 1950s and has gained momentum since the 1960s, to challenges posed by emerging scientific and historical-critical scholarship, as well as to the predictable pressures of greater religious and cultural diversity.
Choice A: No. The phrase transformed the American religious landscape may make this choice seem tempting, but it is a memory trap reminiscent of the phrase in the passage that states various transformations in American religious life. However, there is no evidence in the passage to support the idea that the author cites the emergence of increasing religious and cultural diversity (rephrased as increasing pluralism in the answer choice) in order to emphasize the importance of this diversity. In fact, the author mentions it as predictable pressures.
Choice B: No. The recycled language secularization and public life may make this choice seem appealing. However, the author states that missing from Wuthnow’s analysis, however, is any decisive refutation of the secularization thesis, leaving open the question of whether the division he describes is ultimately secondary to an encroaching secular culture. Therefore, the author does not mention the emergence of increasing religious and cultural diversity as contributing to the further secularization of public life.
Choice C: No. The recycled language cultural may make this choice seem appealing. However, the phrase largely in agreement is extreme language. The passage only mentions two sociologists, Stark and Wuthnow, not sociologists in general, and there is no evidence that they are largely in agreement regarding increasing religious and cultural diversity.
Choice D: No. The phrase scientific and historically sensitive modern mindset may make this choice seem tempting, but it is a memory trap reminiscent of the phrase in the passage that states emerging scientific and historical-critical scholarship. While the author does mention American religious transformation, there is no inquiry into other religious changes.
Choice E: Correct. This answer choice is supported by the passage. An important religious schism in the answer choice is a paraphrase polarizing division between liberal and conservative movements in the passage. The passages states that Wuthnow’s cautious account of various transformations in American religious life, by contrast, provides an evenhanded depiction of several critical cultural developments, such as the decentralizing of traditional denominational divisions in favor of a more prominent and more polarizing division between liberal and conservative movements. He properly links this division, which emerged in the 1940s and 1950s and has gained momentum since the 1960s, to challenges posed by emerging scientific and historical-critical scholarship, as well as to the predictable pressures of greater religious and cultural diversity.
The correct answer is choice E.
3. The author suggests that Wuthnow claims that contemporary religious practice within the United States compared to that of 100 years ago
Difficulty Level: Very Hard
Explanation
The word suggests in the question stem indicates that this is an inference question. The subject of this question is Wuthnow’s claims about contemporary religious practice within the United States compared to that of 100 years ago. The task of the question is indicated by the word suggests. In order to answer the question, determine what the passage states about the subject and evaluate the answer choices, eliminating any choice which cannot be supported by the text. According to the passage, Wuthnow’s cautious account of various transformations in American religious life, by contrast, provides an evenhanded depiction of several critical cultural developments, such as the decentralizing of traditional denominational divisions in favor of a more prominent and more polarizing division between liberal and conservative movements. He properly links this division, which emerged in the 1940s and 1950s and has gained momentum since the 1960s, to challenges posed by emerging scientific and historical-critical scholarship, as well as to the predictable pressures of greater religious and cultural diversity.
Choice A: No. The use of the recycled language decline may make this answer choice seem appealing. However, this choice is a reversal. The author states that Wuthnow clearly understands American religious transformations in terms far removed from decline, in failing to address the topic directly he leaves his readers’ secularist assumptions unchallenged.
Choice B: No. The use of the recycled language decline may make this answer choice seem appealing. However, this choice is a reversal. The author states that Wuthnow clearly understands American religious transformations in terms far removed from decline, in failing to address the topic directly he leaves his readers’ secularist assumptions unchallenged.
Choice C: Correct. This choice is supported by the passage. The phrase sharper fundamental contrast in the answer choice is a paraphrase of a more prominent and more polarizing division between liberal and conservative movements in the text. The passage continues with he properly links this division, which emerged in the 1940s and 1950s and has gained momentum since the 1960s which continues the idea of a contrast and provides the necessary timeframe.
Choice D: No. The phrase fewer distinct denominations may make this choice seem tempting, but it is a memory trap reminiscent of the phrase several critical cultural developments, such as the decentralizing of traditional denominational divisions in the text. Although the denominations have been decentralized, there is no indication that there are fewer of them.
Choice E: No. The phrase greater number is extreme language. Although the passage mentions the decentralizing of traditional denominational divisions in favor of a more prominent and more polarizing division between liberal and conservative movements, there is no such comparison of the number of divisions.
The correct answer is choice C.
Hope it helps