Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 02:49 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 02:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,716
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,716
Kudos: 810,347
 [20]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,716
Own Kudos:
810,347
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,716
Kudos: 810,347
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
winterschool
User avatar
Verbal Chat Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Last visit: 13 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,681
Posts: 1,891
Kudos: 1,664
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jrk23
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Last visit: 29 Oct 2021
Posts: 296
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 296
Kudos: 80
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Bunuel
The company's chief executive, whose technological expertise, views on the future of the industry, and decision-making style were impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches often differed substantially from her own.

(A) were impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches often differed substantially from

(B) impressed the managers who worked with her, also was acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches often differed substantially from

(C) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, that included executives at rival companies, whose approaches were different substantially in comparison to

(D) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, who included executives at rival companies, the approaches of whom differed substantially when compared to

(E) were an impression to the managers who worked with her, also was acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches were often substantially different from that of

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



B

The first word of the underlined portion should not be singular, since it refers to all three items in the preceding list. Thus, (C) and (D) can be eliminated. The phrase "were an impression", which opens (E), is extremely unidiomatic, so (E) can eliminated as well.

If you focus only on the beginning of the underlined portion, (B) is preferable to (A), as (B) does not employ the passive voice. This is a subtle distinction, but the sort of thing that makes one answer superior to another on a di¢ cult question. Also, "also was acknowledged" is preferable to "was also acknowledged", since there was no previous "was" in the sentence, and "also was acknowledged" put the entire verb ("was acknowledged") in one place. Choice (B) is correct.

Hello sir what about comparison at last sentence.

" whose approaches often differed substantially from" here ...in A and in B option...are we not comparing approach to her.

The thing that we need to compare here is the approach. That's why i eliminated both.

Please correct me.

Thanks :)
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 348
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 348
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jrk23
Bunuel
Bunuel
The company's chief executive, whose technological expertise, views on the future of the industry, and decision-making style were impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches often differed substantially from her own.

(A) were impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches often differed substantially from

(B) impressed the managers who worked with her, also was acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches often differed substantially from

(C) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, that included executives at rival companies, whose approaches were different substantially in comparison to

(D) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, who included executives at rival companies, the approaches of whom differed substantially when compared to

(E) were an impression to the managers who worked with her, also was acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches were often substantially different from that of

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



B

The first word of the underlined portion should not be singular, since it refers to all three items in the preceding list. Thus, (C) and (D) can be eliminated. The phrase "were an impression", which opens (E), is extremely unidiomatic, so (E) can eliminated as well.

If you focus only on the beginning of the underlined portion, (B) is preferable to (A), as (B) does not employ the passive voice. This is a subtle distinction, but the sort of thing that makes one answer superior to another on a di¢ cult question. Also, "also was acknowledged" is preferable to "was also acknowledged", since there was no previous "was" in the sentence, and "also was acknowledged" put the entire verb ("was acknowledged") in one place. Choice (B) is correct.

Hello sir what about comparison at last sentence.

" whose approaches often differed substantially from" here ...in A and in B option...are we not comparing approach to her.

The thing that we need to compare here is the approach. That's why i eliminated both.

Please correct me.

Thanks :)

This question is made up from this official question. https://gmatclub.com/forum/bluegrass-mu ... ml#p511544
User avatar
Jitu20
Joined: 02 May 2020
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
Posts: 53
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis GMATNinja, could you breakdown A vs B?
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 348
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 348
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Jitu20
generis GMATNinja, could you breakdown A vs B?

This question is from this official guide. https://gmatclub.com/forum/bluegrass-mu ... ml#p511544
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,162
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
Jitu20
generis GMATNinja, could you breakdown A vs B?

This question is from this official guide. https://gmatclub.com/forum/bluegrass-mu ... ml#p511544

This is an OG question?

The explanation is super wonky:

Also, "also was acknowledged" is preferable to "was also acknowledged", since there was no previous "was" in the sentence, and "also was acknowledged" put the entire verb ("was acknowledged") in one place. Choice (B) is correct.

I find it terrible that 'also was acknowledged' is preferred over 'was also acknowledged'. What's the rule in the English language that suggests that 'was' has to come a prior?

Bunuel is this an official question? I think it's important to know in light of the above. This is a recurring issue that I have seen in other sentences.
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 348
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 348
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CEdward
lakshya14
Jitu20
generis GMATNinja, could you breakdown A vs B?

This question is from this official guide. https://gmatclub.com/forum/bluegrass-mu ... ml#p511544

This is an OG question?

The explanation is super wonky:

Also, "also was acknowledged" is preferable to "was also acknowledged", since there was no previous "was" in the sentence, and "also was acknowledged" put the entire verb ("was acknowledged") in one place. Choice (B) is correct.

I find it terrible that 'also was acknowledged' is preferred over 'was also acknowledged'. What's the rule in the English language that suggests that 'was' has to come a prior?

Bunuel is this an official question? I think it's important to know in light of the above. This is a recurring issue that I have seen in other sentences.

The link provided in the previous one has the original question from official guide.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,162
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
CEdward
lakshya14
generis GMATNinja, could you breakdown A vs B?

This question is from this official guide. https://gmatclub.com/forum/bluegrass-mu ... ml#p511544

This is an OG question?

The explanation is super wonky:

Also, "also was acknowledged" is preferable to "was also acknowledged", since there was no previous "was" in the sentence, and "also was acknowledged" put the entire verb ("was acknowledged") in one place. Choice (B) is correct.

I find it terrible that 'also was acknowledged' is preferred over 'was also acknowledged'. What's the rule in the English language that suggests that 'was' has to come a prior?

Bunuel is this an official question? I think it's important to know in light of the above. This is a recurring issue that I have seen in other sentences.

The link provided in the previous one has the original question from official guide.

generis GMATNinja MartyTargetTestPrep can you chime in on this?
avatar
sumitchawla123
Joined: 08 Feb 2015
Last visit: 31 May 2025
Posts: 1
Concentration: Operations
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The company's chief executive, whose technological expertise, views on the future of the industry, and decision-making style were impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches often differed substantially from her own.

(A) were impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches often differed substantially "whole technological expertise......" is a modifier of the company's executive. were is incorrect.

(B) impressed the managers who worked with her, also was acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches often differed substantially from----need the verb that should refer to subject 'the company's executive'. impressed is the correct verb

(C) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, that included executives at rival companies, whose approaches were different substantially in comparison to...placement of also is incorrect. comma followed by that is incorrect.

(D) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, who included executives at rival companies, the approaches of whom differed substantially when compared to... acknowledge is being used in this option as a verb. acknowledge what? also was acknowledged is correct.

(E) were an impression to the managers who worked with her, also was acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside her firm, including executives at rival companies, whose approaches were often substantially different from that of..were is referring to singular subject incorrectly.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,399
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,399
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts