Bauhaus architects like Ludwig Mies Van der Rohe and Walter Gropius are examples of the type of artistic pioneer who is misunderstood at first, but
sells for a great profit and comes to stand as a monument to modernism.My analysis is below:
Intended meaning3
contrasting facts are stated regarding 3 Bauhaus architects: they are examples of the artist who is misunderstood at first,
but whose work sells for a great profit and this work comes to stand as a monument to modernism.
Error analysisMeaning: the type of artistic pioneer cannot sell himself, so it is referring to his work. Whose work
sells ...and (
whose work)
comes is correct parallelism.
POV(A)
sells for a great profit and comes to stand as a monument to modernism.
Incorrect. Meaning.(B)
who sells for a great profit and
becomes a modernism monument your answer.
Incorrect. Meaning.(C)
whose work sells for a great profit and
comes to stand as a monument to modernism.
Correct meaning and parallelism: ...whose work sells... and comes to..(D) who sells his work for a great profit
to stand as a monument to modernism.
Incorrect. This option has a different meaning error because just 2 facts are stated and also a purpose is added to the second fact. This option means that he sells his work for a profit in order to stand as a monument.. (E)
then whose work
sold for a great profit and
became a monument to modernism.
Incorrect. Tense error. all facts should be stated in present tense.Hope the explanation helps!
Rumi