Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 18:24 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 18:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
calreg11
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Last visit: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
1,161
 [137]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE:Account Management (Consumer Packaged Goods)
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
119
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,873
 [51]
33
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
cyberjadugar
Joined: 29 Mar 2012
Last visit: 01 Apr 2026
Posts: 264
Own Kudos:
1,814
 [14]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V28
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V38
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 264
Kudos: 1,814
 [14]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
LalaB
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Last visit: 17 Jul 2016
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
1,378
 [7]
Given Kudos: 73
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
Posts: 227
Kudos: 1,378
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
question stem
total=100
W=45
E= more than 38
W-and-E=x
Neither=2x
x?
answer-
100=45+39+2x-x (to maximize x we need to minimize E. that is why E=39 the least value)
x=16
User avatar
duriangris
Joined: 22 Jun 2012
Last visit: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
32
 [5]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 42
Kudos: 32
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Don't know if fundamentally different from other answers but here's how I got it:

E: editor
/E: not editor
W: writer
/W: not writer

E(W) = X
E(W)+E(/W)=Y>38
E(/W)=Y-X
/E(/W)=2X
hence /W=Y+X
total: 100=Y+X+45
hence Y+X=55
least value of Y=39 for a maximized X

Hence X=16
avatar
MelanieMa
Joined: 28 Feb 2014
Last visit: 16 Sep 2014
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 5
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also get x<17.
But how do I know that x is 16 and not 6?
User avatar
ind23
Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Last visit: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
51
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 22
Kudos: 51
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MelanieMa
I also get x<17.
But how do I know that x is 16 and not 6?

Hi,

The question asks for the highest possible value of x.
So it is 16 not 6
User avatar
PerfectScores
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Last visit: 29 Nov 2025
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
281
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 103
Kudos: 281
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
calreg11
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?

A. 6
B. 16
C. 17
D. 33
E. 84

W + E - Both + Neither = 100

45 + E - (x) + 2x = 100

45 + E + x = 100

Now let us plug in answer options:

We cannot plug in 84 as E will become negative
If we plug in x = 33 then E = 22 (Wrong as there are more than 38 editors)
If we plug in x = 17 then E = 38 (Wrong as there are more than 38 editors)
Hence answer is x= 16
User avatar
russ9
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Last visit: 20 Apr 2015
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 170
Kudos: 426
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
calreg11
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?
6
16
17
33
84

{Total}={Writers}+{Editors}-{Both}+{Neither}.

{Total}=100;
{Writers}=45;
{Editors}>38;
{Both}=x;
{Neither}=2x;

100=45+{Editors}-x+2x --> x=55-{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=55-39=16.

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunuel,

Can you please explain "100=45+{Editors}-x+2x --> x=55-{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=55-39=16."

I understand the concept that when we want to maximize something, we want to minimize the other, but why do we want to minimize editors? Aren't we trying to find the greatest number of editors AND writers? Shouldn't we want to MAXIMIZE Editors AND Writers?

Thanks
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,873
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
russ9
Bunuel
calreg11
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?
6
16
17
33
84

{Total}={Writers}+{Editors}-{Both}+{Neither}.

{Total}=100;
{Writers}=45;
{Editors}>38;
{Both}=x;
{Neither}=2x;

100=45+{Editors}-x+2x --> x=55-{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=55-39=16.

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunuel,

Can you please explain "100=45+{Editors}-x+2x --> x=55-{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=55-39=16."

I understand the concept that when we want to maximize something, we want to minimize the other, but why do we want to minimize editors? Aren't we trying to find the greatest number of editors AND writers? Shouldn't we want to MAXIMIZE Editors AND Writers?

Thanks

We want to maximize x, which is {both writers and editors}. To maximize x, we need to minimize {Editors} because x = 55 - {Editors}.

Does this make sense?
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,986
Own Kudos:
5,858
 [2]
Given Kudos: 163
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,986
Kudos: 5,858
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Given: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither.

Asked: What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?


Writers~WritersTotal
Editorsxy-xy>38
~Editors100-y-2x2x100-y<62
Total4555100

x + (100-y-2x) = 45
55 = x+y
y = 55-x > 38
x < 17
Maximum value of x = 16


Writers~WritersTotal
Editorsx55-2x55-x
~Editors45-x2x45+x
Total4555100

IMO B
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,397
 [1]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,397
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
calreg11
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?

A. 6
B. 16
C. 17
D. 33
E. 84

Here is a video solution to this question:

avatar
Engineer1
Joined: 01 Jan 2014
Last visit: 23 Jan 2026
Posts: 195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 457
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 195
Kudos: 766
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

calreg11
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?
6
16
17
33
84
{Total} = {Writers} + {Editors} - {Both} + {Neither}.

{Total} = 100;
{Writers} = 45;
{Editors} > 38;
{Both} = x;
{Neither} = 2x;

100 = 45 + {Editors} - x + 2x
x = 55 - {Editors}.

We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus:
x = {Both} = 55 - 39 = 16.

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.
­Great approach w/ Venn Diagram. I thought of doing this way and made a silly mistake. Chose C at first. Anyhow, here is my solution.

 ­
Attachments

IMG_0534.jpg
IMG_0534.jpg [ 2.12 MiB | Viewed 7270 times ]

User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,964
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,964
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts