Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 20:22 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 20:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
roopika2990
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Last visit: 07 Dec 2016
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
495
 [200]
Given Kudos: 349
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 67
Kudos: 495
 [200]
27
Kudos
Add Kudos
173
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
HHPreparation
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 10 Jun 2018
Last visit: 30 Oct 2023
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
41
 [25]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Germany
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V28
GMAT 2: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.14
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 22
Kudos: 41
 [25]
23
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,663
 [18]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,663
 [18]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sandman13
Joined: 20 Apr 2018
Last visit: 26 Dec 2019
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
304
 [5]
Given Kudos: 156
Concentration: Technology, Nonprofit
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
WE:Analyst (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Posts: 132
Kudos: 304
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The skeptics mentioned in the first paragraph would be most likely to agree with the astronomers mentioned in line 13 about which of the following statements concerning the galaxy M87?

"A few skeptics have argued that the concentration of mass necessary to explain the speed of the whirling gas is not necessarily a black hole: the concentration in M87 might be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars."
before we go to the options, let's establish that skeptics have another theory to explain whirling gas clouds. The astronomers think the whirling is caused by a black hole.

(A) The speed of the gas whirling around the center of M87 is caused by a dense object that is not a black hole. <- nope. this is what the skeptics might believe. astronomers think it's caused by black hole. eliminate.

(B) The concentration of mass at the center of M87 is probably a large cluster of dim stars. <- this would go counter to what the astronomers believe; can't be a point of agreement. eliminate.

(C) The presence of a black hole at the center of M87 is the most likely explanation for the speed of the gas whirling about the galaxy’s core. <- this would go counter to what the skeptics believe (flip side of option B); can't be a point of agreement. eliminate.

(D) The speed of the gas whirling around the center of M87 is caused by a large concentration of mass at the core of M87. <- yes, both agree that there's something which is causing this swirling. keep.

(E) The gravitational influence of a star cluster would not be strong enough to account for the speed of the gas whirling around the core of M87. <- this would break skeptics claim; not mentioned in passage. eliminate.

Answer: D

Hope it helps.

Cheers!
User avatar
proabhinav
Joined: 03 Aug 2018
Last visit: 20 Jan 2026
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
19
 [2]
Given Kudos: 263
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 590 Q45 V26
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 590 Q45 V26
Posts: 57
Kudos: 19
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine the possible explanation for the whirling gas in M87 that is mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph?


(B) A cluster of stars at the center would preclude the existence of certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87.

(C) The stars within many existing galaxies, such as NGC 4258, are more closely spaced than are the stars within the core of M87.

Dear All

Anyone , please can you advice reasons for C over B. I was confused between these two and chose C, reasons that in the passage " If the center of NGC 4258 were a star cluster, the stars would be so closely spaced that collisions between individual stars would have long ago torn the cluster apart. ". I inferred from this sentence that the finding was of not a star cluster but something else, if not black hole.

I thought this undermines the explanation.

Please can anyone advice, happy to be advised if you believe my understanding of the passage is not correct, I did find the last sentence confusing.
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,170
Own Kudos:
5,939
 [5]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,170
Kudos: 5,939
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
proabhinav - hope this is helpful.

So this is a weakening question. 'if true' means we can use some imaginary situation, which may or may not true. before going for POE my pre-thoughts are --- I am looking for a choice, that weaken " the concentration in M87 might be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars.", In other words a choice that says that it is not true cause if this is true then some XYZ should also happen, but that is not. in general you want to look for existence of something you look for some evidence tto its presence. B is on these lines and I find it correct


(B) A cluster of stars at the center would preclude the existence of certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87.

(C) The stars within many existing galaxies, such as NGC 4258, are more closely spaced than are the stars within the core of M87. ---- Why this choice is not correct? Are you sure that if something is true on other galaxy then its true here. May be presence of a huge gravitational force is stabilizing that galaxy. All I am saying is this choice is not providing enough info to conclude.
User avatar
Ohbebby
Joined: 21 Jun 2018
Last visit: 28 May 2020
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 183
Products:
Posts: 51
Kudos: 64
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question 4, the passage is primarily concerned with-

Is there any other way to eliminate option E besides the word 'unusual' in it?
avatar
omersoylu
Joined: 13 Apr 2020
Last visit: 25 May 2020
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello,
About question 4:
I was able to eliminate A,D, and E. But between B and C I think the answer should be B.
If we look the meaning of each word in the options in option B : the verb CRITICIZE is OK. Because the passage has an opinion and implies that sceptics are wrong. METHOD is not OK but also NOT SO BAD. Because spectics are using another method to explain the phenomenon. ( that method is wrong).
Option C : The verb CONSIDER is NEUTRAL. It implies that passage is just trying to explain or evaluate something. That is not the purpose of the passage. POSSIBLE INSTANCES is WRONG. Because assuming that concentration of gases are not black holes but clusters is an EXPLANATION.
To sum up, I think if we compare B and C in detail, B makes more sense.
Can you please explain what is wrong with my method?

Thank you
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
9,181
 [4]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,181
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
omersoylu
Hello,
About question 4:
I was able to eliminate A,D, and E. But between B and C I think the answer should be B.
If we look the meaning of each word in the options in option B : the verb CRITICIZE is OK. Because the passage has an opinion and implies that sceptics are wrong. METHOD is not OK but also NOT SO BAD. Because spectics are using another method to explain the phenomenon. ( that method is wrong).
Option C : The verb CONSIDER is NEUTRAL. It implies that passage is just trying to explain or evaluate something. That is not the purpose of the passage. POSSIBLE INSTANCES is WRONG. Because assuming that concentration of gases are not black holes but clusters is an EXPLANATION.
To sum up, I think if we compare B and C in detail, B makes more sense.
Can you please explain what is wrong with my method?

Thank you

Hi Omer

Let me try to address your query. Let us first consider option (B).

(B) criticizing a method used to gather data about a natural phenomenon

The verb "criticize" only applies to the second paragraph. The first paragraph does not have any criticism or even supporting context for any criticisms in the passage. "Method" in this context should refer to a scientific process or steps which are taken to achieve a particular aim. The passage does not consider any such method. Finally, the passage does not address "data gathering" in any part or form. Overall, I would say this option does not describe the primary purpose of this passage.

(C) considering possible instances of a particular phenomenon

The word "consider" applies to both paragraphs since the passage does consider two "possible instances" of a black hole. In both the galaxies mentioned, the "possibility" of there being a black hole at the centre is not convincingly ruled out, and the passage does try to weigh the evidence in favour of and against.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
jmwon
Joined: 26 May 2019
Last visit: 27 Jan 2021
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
52
 [4]
Given Kudos: 248
Posts: 30
Kudos: 52
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question premise: what most clearly undermines the explanation for the whirling gas being a cluster of dim stars? --> So I was looking for answers that would show the whirling gas couldn't be stars or could only be something else other than stars.

I also chose C incorrectly, since I inferred that if the stars were more closely spaced than others that meant that the whirling gas must have been from a black hole. I didn't understand some of the other explanations from other users on why this was incorrect and instead B was correct, so I looked up the word "preclude" and now B makes sense as correct answer.

Preclude means "to prevent from happening; make impossible", hence the existence of a cluster of stars at the center would PREVENT other astronomical phenomena observed at the center of M87, therefore it cannot be a cluster of stars there.

However I did not know what "preclude" meant while I was testing so I tried to figure out a different logic that would have helped arrive at B as correct answer. I read C again, I see that I misinterpreted it and therefore could have eliminated C and chosen B just by process of elimination.

"The stars within many existing galaxies, such as NGC 4258, are more closely spaced than are the stars within the core of M87". --> Later in passage says "if center of NGC 4258 were a star cluster, the stars would be so closely spaced that collisions between individual stars would have long ago torn the cluster apart." C only tells us that NGC 4258 was MORE closely spaced than the stars within the core of M87, so then that means the potential stars in M87 were actually farther apart than NGC 4258 and therefore could have been stars that were not torn apart. So it ultimately doesn't undermine the sentence saying that a concentration of mass could be a cluster of stars, and can be eliminated.

A and E both support the explanation so they are eliminated, and D doesn't provide any information on this other galaxy that also has gas clouds so that is eliminated. Therefore B is the answer.

proabhinav
3. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine the possible explanation for the whirling gas in M87 that is mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph?


(B) A cluster of stars at the center would preclude the existence of certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87.

(C) The stars within many existing galaxies, such as NGC 4258, are more closely spaced than are the stars within the core of M87.

Dear All

Anyone , please can you advice reasons for C over B. I was confused between these two and chose C, reasons that in the passage " If the center of NGC 4258 were a star cluster, the stars would be so closely spaced that collisions between individual stars would have long ago torn the cluster apart. ". I inferred from this sentence that the finding was of not a star cluster but something else, if not black hole.

I thought this undermines the explanation.

Please can anyone advice, happy to be advised if you believe my understanding of the passage is not correct, I did find the last sentence confusing.
User avatar
patto
Joined: 22 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Jul 2021
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 149
Location: Argentina
GMAT 1: 630 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36 (Online)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36 (Online)
Posts: 236
Kudos: 863
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja Would you please explain why C is the correct answer for question 4?
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
9,181
 [3]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,181
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
patto
GMATNinja Would you please explain why C is the correct answer for question 4?

Hi

Let me try to address your query:

4. The passage is primarily concerned with

With a preliminary reading of the passage, we can gather that the first paragraph talks about the existence of black holes and also mentions a possible specific black hole. The second paragraph gives another instance of a possible black hole occurrence, considers an alternative explanation and then rejects it.

With this, let us examine the answer options.

(A) explaining why a particular phenomenon is so rare Neither paragraph talks about black holes being "rare" or otherwise. Eliminate.

(B) criticizing a method used to gather data about a natural phenomenon The second paragraph can be considered a negative view on a topic, however, neither paragraph really criticizes "method used to gather data". Eliminate.

(C) considering possible instances of a particular phenomenon This appears the most promising. The passage considers possible instances of black holes in different galaxies.

(D) distinguishing among several different kinds of natural phenomena The entire passage deals with black holes and, potentially, star clusters only. This cannot be considered "several" kinds of natural phenomena. Eliminate.

(E) questioning a widely accepted explanation for an unusual phenomenon The passage does present an alternate explanation to that of a black hole in a couple of instances. However, we do not know if black holes are a "widely accepted explanation" from the passage. Eliminate.

Hope this helps.
avatar
mba757
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 15 Jun 2020
Last visit: 04 Aug 2022
Posts: 295
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 245
Location: United States
GPA: 3.3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CrackVerbalGMAT
patto
GMATNinja Would you please explain why C is the correct answer for question 4?

Hi

Let me try to address your query:

4. The passage is primarily concerned with

With a preliminary reading of the passage, we can gather that the first paragraph talks about the existence of black holes and also mentions a possible specific black hole. The second paragraph gives another instance of a possible black hole occurrence, considers an alternative explanation and then rejects it.

With this, let us examine the answer options.

(A) explaining why a particular phenomenon is so rare Neither paragraph talks about black holes being "rare" or otherwise. Eliminate.

(B) criticizing a method used to gather data about a natural phenomenon The second paragraph can be considered a negative view on a topic, however, neither paragraph really criticizes "method used to gather data". Eliminate.

(C) considering possible instances of a particular phenomenon This appears the most promising. The passage considers possible instances of black holes in different galaxies.

(D) distinguishing among several different kinds of natural phenomena The entire passage deals with black holes and, potentially, star clusters only. This cannot be considered "several" kinds of natural phenomena. Eliminate.

(E) questioning a widely accepted explanation for an unusual phenomenon The passage does present an alternate explanation to that of a black hole in a couple of instances. However, we do not know if black holes are a "widely accepted explanation" from the passage. Eliminate.

Hope this helps.

Hi CrackVerbalGMAT - I have doubts about your explanation for E. The passage states the following: "Most astronomers believe that the large concentration of mass at the galaxy's center is a black hole whose gravity is causing the gas to whirl" This clearly mentions "MOST astronomers believe...black hole..." How is this not widely accepted?
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
9,181
 [1]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,181
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
samgyupsal

Hi CrackVerbalGMAT - I have doubts about your explanation for E. The passage states the following: "Most astronomers believe that the large concentration of mass at the galaxy's center is a black hole whose gravity is causing the gas to whirl" This clearly mentions "MOST astronomers believe...black hole..." How is this not widely accepted?

Hi Sam

This (the statement about "most astronomers" believing) is specific to the galaxy M87. The passage goes on to mention another galaxy NGC 4258 and considers an alternative explanation for that particular galaxy. Then it goes on to state that alternative explanation to be unlikely.

Question (4) talks about the primary idea of the passage as a whole. The passage does not only deal with the M87 galaxy and nor is it the primary idea being discussed in the passage. If we were to consider the passage as a whole, it does not clarify whether black holes, in general, are a widely accepted phenomenon. If we were to consider the alternative explanation of star clusters, there too the passage is unclear about whether it is widely accepted. Hence, whichever explanation we consider, the part about it being widely accepted, in general, is unclear.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
shanks2020
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 14 Feb 2026
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 236
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
roopika2990
Astronomers theorize that a black hole forms when a massive object shrinks catastrophically under its own gravity, leaving only a gravitational field so strong that nothing escapes it. Astronomers must infer the existence of black holes, which are invisible, from their gravitational influence on the visible bodies surrounding them. For example, observations indicate that gas clouds in galaxy M87 are whirling unusually fast about the galaxy’s center. Most astronomers believe that the large concentration of mass at the galaxy’s center is a black hole whose gravity is causing the gas to whirl. A few skeptics have argued that the concentration of mass necessary to explain the speed of the whirling gas is not necessarily a black hole: the concentration in M87 might be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars.

The same hypothesis might have been applied to the galaxy NGC 4258, but the notion of such a cluster’s existing in NGC 4258 was severely undermined when astronomers measured the speed of a ring of dust and gas rotating close to the galaxy’s center. From its speed, they calculated that the core’s density is more than 40 times the density estimated for any other galaxy. If the center of NGC 4258 were a star cluster, the stars would be so closely spaced that collisions between individual stars would have long ago torn the cluster apart.

1. The skeptics mentioned in the first paragraph would be most likely to agree with the astronomers mentioned in line 13 about which of the following statements concerning the galaxy M87?

(A) The speed of the gas whirling around the center of M87 is caused by a dense object that is not a black hole.

(B) The concentration of mass at the center of M87 is probably a large cluster of dim stars.

(C) The presence of a black hole at the center of M87 is the most likely explanation for the speed of the gas whirling about the galaxy’s core.

(D) The speed of the gas whirling around the center of M87 is caused by a large concentration of mass at the core of M87.

(E) The gravitational influence of a star cluster would not be strong enough to account for the speed of the gas whirling around the core of M87.


2. The passage asserts which of the following about the existence of black holes?

(A) Astronomers first speculated about the existence of black holes when they observed gas whirling around the center of a particular galaxy.

(B) Evidence used to argue for the existence of black holes is indirect, coming from their presumed effects on other astronomical bodies.

(C) Recent observations of certain astronomical bodies have offered proof.

(D) A considerable body of evidence suggests the existence of black holes, even though their behavior is not completely consistent with the laws of physics.

(E) Many astronomers are skeptical about certain recent evidence that has been used to argue for the existence of black holes.


3. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine the possible explanation for the whirling gas in M87 that is mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph?

(A) The stars in a star cluster at the center of M87 could exert a strong gravitational force without tearing the cluster apart.

(B) A cluster of stars at the center would preclude the existence of certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87.

(C) The stars within many existing galaxies, such as NGC 4258, are more closely spaced than are the stars within the core of M87.

(D) Only one other galaxy has been observed to contain gas clouds whirling about its center as they do about the core of M87.

(E) The gravitational force of a cluster of a billion or so dim stars would be sufficient to cause a whirling ring of gas and dust to collect around the center of a galaxy.


4. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) explaining why a particular phenomenon is so rare

(B) criticizing a method used to gather data about a natural phenomenon

(C) considering possible instances of a particular phenomenon

(D) distinguishing among several different kinds of natural phenomena

(E) questioning a widely accepted explanation for an unusual phenomenon


FEATURE 24 June 1995
Obscure objects of Desire
By Marcus Chown

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14619834-200-obscure-objects-of-desire/


Hi CrackVerbalGMAT GMATNinja

In question 3, can you plz. help me understand what is referred to as "certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87 in the correct option B?
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
9,181
 [5]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,181
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shanks2020

Hi CrackVerbalGMAT GMATNinja

In question 3, can you plz. help me understand what is referred to as "certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87 in the correct option B?

Hi Shanks

The passage does not mention any "other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87". However, Q3 asks us to "undermine the possible explanation for the whirling gas in M87 that is mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph". This explanation is that, "the concentration in M87 might be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars".

As per option (B), this star cluster would rule out other phenomena which have been observed at the center of M87. Even though we do not know what exactly these phenomena are, we do know (from the answer option) that they have been "observed". Hence, they must definitely be true/exist. If the star cluster would rule these phenomena out, then it clearly "undermines" the presence of the "cluster of a billion or so dim stars", which is only a hypothesized explanation as given in the passage (" the concentration in M87 might be..."). Hence, it is not necessary for us to know what exactly these "phenomena" are, as long as we are sure that they exist.

Hope this clarifies.
User avatar
shanks2020
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 14 Feb 2026
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 236
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CrackVerbalGMAT
shanks2020

Hi CrackVerbalGMAT GMATNinja

In question 3, can you plz. help me understand what is referred to as "certain other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87 in the correct option B?

Hi Shanks

The passage does not mention any "other astronomical phenomena that have been observed at the center of M87". However, Q3 asks us to "undermine the possible explanation for the whirling gas in M87 that is mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph". This explanation is that, "the concentration in M87 might be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars".

As per option (B), this star cluster would rule out other phenomena which have been observed at the center of M87. Even though we do not know what exactly these phenomena are, we do know (from the answer option) that they have been "observed". Hence, they must definitely be true/exist. If the star cluster would rule these phenomena out, then it clearly "undermines" the presence of the "cluster of a billion or so dim stars", which is only a hypothesized explanation as given in the passage (" the concentration in M87 might be..."). Hence, it is not necessary for us to know what exactly these "phenomena" are, as long as we are sure that they exist.

Hope this clarifies.

Hi CrackVerbalGMAT

Sorry, but i did not get the logic behind it. Let me explain.
The passage hypothesize that the center mass might be cluster of stars.
Now this option B mentions that THIS star cluster rules out CERTAIN other phenomenon observed at the center of M87.
If i look closely, it does not mention any other phenomenon or all phenomenon. That means that "Certain" could be anything.
Moreover, it does not rule out that that cluster of stars are not those which are causing the whirling of gas. In fact, it strenghtens it by stating something else is not there/so it is like ruling out alternate causes.
AndrewN may be you can provide your thoughts too!!!
But the question asks to undermine the statement.
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
9,181
 [3]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,181
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shanks2020

Sorry, but i did not get the logic behind it. Let me explain.
The passage hypothesize that the center mass might be cluster of stars.
Now this option B mentions that THIS star cluster rules out CERTAIN other phenomenon observed at the center of M87.
If i look closely, it does not mention any other phenomenon or all phenomenon. That means that "Certain" could be anything.
Moreover, it does not rule out that that cluster of stars are not those which are causing the whirling of gas. In fact, it strenghtens it by stating something else is not there/so it is like ruling out alternate causes.
AndrewN may be you can provide your thoughts too!!!
But the question asks to undermine the statement.

Hi

You are absolutely right that that "Certain" could be anything. However, we do know something for sure about it - that it has been "observed", and therefore must exist for sure. Now, let's call these "certain phenomena" X.

We know that X exists for sure. But, as per option (B), if there were a "cluster of stars at the center of M87" (which, let's note, is only a hypothetical scenario), then X should not exist ("...would preclude the existence of certain other astronomical phenomena..."). Therefore, this undermines the theory that there is a cluster of stars at the center of M87. It takes this simple structure:

If A --> B then (not B) --> (not A)

As per option (B), if A (ie; cluster of stars), then (not X) (ie; no "certain phenomena")
We know X exists [ie; not (not X) is true], therefore (not A) (no cluster of stars) must be true

Also, no alternative explanation is being ruled out. The "cluster of stars" hypothesis is presented to explain the swirling gas. What is being ruled out in option (B) is X - which are not related to the swirling gas in any way.

Hope this clarifies.
User avatar
KeyurJoshi
Joined: 28 Aug 2019
Last visit: 30 Aug 2023
Posts: 143
Own Kudos:
155
 [6]
Given Kudos: 405
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE:Business Development (Computer Software)
Products:
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A few skeptics have argued that the concentration of mass necessary to explain the speed of the whirling gas is not necessarily a blackhole: the concentration in M87 might be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars.

What I could conclude from the skeptics hypothesis:

BLACKHOLE not necessarily CAUSES --> WHIRLING GAS

Hypothesis: A CLUSTER (of a billion or so dim stars) MIGHT CAUSE --> WHIRLING GAS

We need to weaken this hypothesis,
What choice (B) says,

(B) CLUSTER PREVENTS OTHER ASTRONOMICAL PHENOMENA (such as WHIRLING GAS)

i.e. (CLUSTER DOESN'T CAUSE WHIRLING GAS BUT PREVENTS IT FROM HAPPENING.)
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,211
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,211
Kudos: 960
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
3. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine the possible explanation for the whirling gas in M87 that is mentioned in the last sentence of the first paragraph?
Quote:
(A) The stars in a star cluster at the center of M87 could exert a strong gravitational force without tearing the cluster apart.
Most astronomers believe that the large concentration of mass at the galaxy’s center is a black hole whose gravity is causing the gas to whirl.

A few skeptics have argued that the concentration of mass necessary to explain the speed of the whirling gas is not necessarily a black hole: the concentration in M87 might be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars.


Basically we need to weaken the hypothesis that the concentration in M87 might be a cluster of a billion or so dim stars (Let’s say it cluster theory). In other words, if we can infer that it is black hole then also it undermines the cluster theory.

The last lines of passage says:
If the center of NGC 4258 were a star cluster, the stars would be so closely spaced that collisions between individual stars would have long ago torn the cluster apart.

It means that starts can be closely spaced due to black hole. If no black hole then cluster would be torn apart

With this understanding when we read A, it says stars could exert a strong gravitational force without tearing cluster apart. So it means it is not due to concentration of billion or so dim stars but because of black hole or other phenomenon; but definitely not due to cluster theory.

With this understanding, why should I not choose A?

Please suggest .

Quote:
(E) The gravitational force of a cluster of a billion or so dim stars would be sufficient to cause a whirling ring of gas and dust to collect around the center of a galaxy.

Can I say E supports the conclusion drawn in the last lines of 1st passage instead of weakening? It is actually supporting the cluster theory , is not it? Kindly give your comments.


CrackVerbalGMAT GMATNinja @AndrewN : please give your opinion.
( sorry AndrewN for tagging you again for another passage in a day) :)
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts