Last visit was: 24 Sep 2026, 22:59 It is currently 24 Sep 2026, 22:59
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
goodyear2013
User avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Last visit: 29 May 2020
Posts: 389
Own Kudos:
5,900
 [7]
Given Kudos: 289
Posts: 389
Kudos: 5,900
 [7]
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation 16 Jan 2014, 13:56
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

73% (01:03) correct 27% (01:09) wrong based on 582 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation


Hi, I want to know why it is "has", please.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C
User avatar
maaadhu
User avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2013
Last visit: 16 Sep 2014
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
196
 [3]
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 96
Kudos: 196
 [3]
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation 16 Jan 2014, 14:14
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goodyear2013
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation


Hi, I want to know why it is "has", please.
Show more


From 1954 to till now, Supreme Court is still hearing cases in which lawyers are debating what constituted segregation.

Since the action started in the past and continuing in the present, present perfect needs to be used.

So "usage of has" is correct.
User avatar
sid200207
User avatar
Joined: 26 May 2014
Last visit: 11 Feb 2016
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
35
 [1]
Given Kudos: 204
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
Schools: HEC '15 Erasmus '16 HSG '16 (S)  (A) Smurfit FT'16 (A)
WE:Design (Manufacturing)
Schools: HEC '15 Erasmus '16 HSG '16 (S)  (A) Smurfit FT'16 (A)
Posts: 13
Kudos: 35
 [1]
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation 06 Sep 2014, 21:12
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goodyear2013
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation


Hi, I want to know why it is "has", please.
Show more

Usually words like since,within....is followed by has + verb-ed..can eliminate most choices.
User avatar
arvind910619
User avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 799
Own Kudos:
621
 [1]
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 799
Kudos: 621
 [1]
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation 06 Jun 2017, 11:19
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO C
It correctly indicates that the activitity is still going on


Sent from my ONE E1003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
nitred
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2016
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
108
Given Kudos: 90
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Posts: 22
Kudos: 108
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation 14 Jun 2017, 09:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why is D wrong? What is wrong with "has" constituted?
User avatar
RaguramanS
User avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2016
Last visit: 09 Feb 2018
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
181
 [1]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Rutgers '18 ISB '18 Great Lakes '18 Sloan '18
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.12
WE:Education (Internet and New Media)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Rutgers '18 ISB '18 Great Lakes '18 Sloan '18
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V36
Posts: 71
Kudos: 181
 [1]
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation 14 Jun 2017, 09:51
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

The question tests the knowledge on

Meaning clarity, Tenses, Verb Usage



Meaning
Supreme Court ruled segregation was unconstitutional (At The Past)
From that time, there has been intense debate in Supreme Court as what can be categorized as constitution segregation (At past and present)

POE
Please consider the Red flag "Since"- Present perfect should be used
Options A, B, E can be eliminated due to the wrong usage of tenses

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation [Past]
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation [Past perfect]
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation [Past Continuous]

Between C and D
D. There is an ambiguity in meaning. This option says that the lawyers heard only the cases in which there has been a debate on constituted segregation
Hence Option C
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,261
Own Kudos:
42,504
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,261
Kudos: 42,504
 [1]
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation 14 Jun 2017, 11:07
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Doesn't look like a Gmattish question. The shift of tense is blatantly gross.
It is accepted that the preposition 'since' entails a present perfect tense. When you use perfect tense for the main part, you must maintain that tense in other parts too. However, it is not clear why all the choices including those that use the perfect tense for the main part are not using the present perfect such as 'has debated' and 'has constituted' for the other parts too, including the supposedly correct choice C.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,907
Own Kudos:
843,449
Given Kudos: 111,813
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,907
Kudos: 843,449
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation 20 Aug 2018, 08:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goodyear2013
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation


Hi, I want to know why it is "has", please.
Show more

KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



Since 1954 means that you're dealing with a process that began in the past and is still in progress. Therefore, has heard is better than heard, had heard, or was hearing because the perfect tense (has heard) describes a situation that began in the past and continues into the present. Eliminate (A), (B), and (E). (D) is wrong because changing constituted into the perfect has constituted unnecessarily changes the meaning of the sentence. Go with (C).
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,666
Own Kudos:
1,042
Posts: 19,666
Kudos: 1,042
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation 03 Apr 2021, 05:16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
AbhishekP220108
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts