Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 12:05 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 12:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Harley1980
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 997
Own Kudos:
6,769
 [25]
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 997
Kudos: 6,769
 [25]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,464
 [13]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,464
 [13]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
kartzcool
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Last visit: 27 Mar 2018
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Posts: 9
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Krystallized
Joined: 05 Nov 2016
Last visit: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Location: India
Concentration: Operations
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.9
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 26
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is the use of a comma after "that" correct in the sentence?
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 963
Own Kudos:
1,936
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,561
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 963
Kudos: 1,936
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kartzcool
In option A, the phrase "to speak a foreign language" is placed within commas. Doesn't this mean that the phrase now is a non essential modifier?

Krystallized
the order can change. In other word, this is another way to write A. "the paradigm that we need to converse with a native speaker to speak a foreign language...."
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,170
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,170
Kudos: 5,939
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

MAGOOSH Official Explanation:



(A) This question is an example of how the GMAT will sometimes choose an OA that is less than ideal. (A) is an example of such an imperfect sentence. Typically, a comma doesn’t follow “that”. Here it is okay because we are reversing the clause, “we need to converse with a native speaker to speak a foreign language”, becomes “to speak a foreign language, we need to converse with a native speaker”.

(B) The phrase beginning with “with” should logically modify the subject “the paradigm," but in this case it does not logically do so. The paradigm is actually that we need to converse with a native speaker. Thus, this is an example of a misplaced modifier.

(C) A clause beginning with “with” is always suspect on the GMAT, since it usually illogically modifies what comes after the comma. This case is no different. Does the action of foreign-language moving online describe the act of “conversing with a native speaker”? The two are clearly independent. Also, the “which” does not have a clear referent.

(D) implies that the paradigm has become swiftly obsolete. It also says that "the need to converse with a native speaker to speak a foreign language" is the paradigm because foreign language learning moves online. This is illogical and changes the meaning.

(E) After a long beginning adverbial clause, separating the subject “paradigm” from the verb with a long relative clause is a no-no. The more obvious error, however, is the “paradigm, which”. We are describing a specific paradigm, not all paradigms in general. Therefore, we want “that”. Finally, there is a slight change in meaning. The original sentence says the paradigm is becoming obsolete. (E) implies the paradigm has already become obsolete.

Answer: (A)
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Apr 2026
Posts: 743
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 743
Kudos: 419
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Harley1980
As foreign-language learning moves online, the paradigm that, to speak a foreign language, we need to converse with a native speaker is becoming swiftly obsolete.

A) As foreign-language learning moves online, the paradigm that, to speak a foreign language, we need to converse with a native speaker is becoming
B) With the learning of a foreign language moving online, the paradigm that we need to converse with a native speaker to speak a foreign language becomes
C) With foreign-language learning moving online, conversing with a native speaker to speak a foreign language, which is the paradigm, is becoming
D) Because the learning of a foreign language moves online, the need to converse with a native speaker to speak a foreign language is the paradigm, which has become
E) As foreign-language learning moves online, the paradigm, which is we need a native speaker in order to speak a foreign language, has become

the main error of choice B is " becomes".
simple present is used to show a condition which exist indefinitely or at least i think so. the earth orbit the sun.
if in B we used becomes, its meaing is the becoming exist indefinitely before and after learning moves online. this is not logic.
User avatar
aproposof
Joined: 21 Aug 2021
Last visit: 18 Dec 2023
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 12
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why "is becoming" here is correct?
User avatar
nayas96
Joined: 26 Jan 2021
Last visit: 24 Apr 2022
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 42
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aragonn

MAGOOSH Official Explanation:



(A) This question is an example of how the GMAT will sometimes choose an OA that is less than ideal. (A) is an example of such an imperfect sentence. Typically, a comma doesn’t follow “that”. Here it is okay because we are reversing the clause, “we need to converse with a native speaker to speak a foreign language”, becomes “to speak a foreign language, we need to converse with a native speaker”.

(B) The phrase beginning with “with” should logically modify the subject “the paradigm," but in this case it does not logically do so. The paradigm is actually that we need to converse with a native speaker. Thus, this is an example of a misplaced modifier.

(C) A clause beginning with “with” is always suspect on the GMAT, since it usually illogically modifies what comes after the comma. This case is no different. Does the action of foreign-language moving online describe the act of “conversing with a native speaker”? The two are clearly independent. Also, the “which” does not have a clear referent.

(D) implies that the paradigm has become swiftly obsolete. It also says that "the need to converse with a native speaker to speak a foreign language" is the paradigm because foreign language learning moves online. This is illogical and changes the meaning.

(E) After a long beginning adverbial clause, separating the subject “paradigm” from the verb with a long relative clause is a no-no. The more obvious error, however, is the “paradigm, which”. We are describing a specific paradigm, not all paradigms in general. Therefore, we want “that”. Finally, there is a slight change in meaning. The original sentence says the paradigm is becoming obsolete. (E) implies the paradigm has already become obsolete.

Answer: (A)

In option (C) the statement mentions "A clause beginning with “with” is always suspect on the GMAT, since it usually illogically modifies what comes after the comma." Then, if we look at option (B) it mentions "The phrase beginning with “with” should logically modify the subject “the paradigm," but in this case it does not logically do so", given that the statement for option (B) is With the...., paradigm. SO logically as per the explaination in option (C), the preceding prepositional phrase in option (B), actually modifies paradigm. Please correct me if I am wrong.

If suppose my above explaination is correct, then please do let me know why is option (B) incorrect.

mikemcgarry Kindly please clarify.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,216
Own Kudos:
6,163
 [1]
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,216
Kudos: 6,163
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aproposof
Why "is becoming" here is correct?

Hello aproposof,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, the use of the simple present continuous tense verb "is becoming" is correct here because the action of the "paradigm" becoming obsolete is currently ongoing and continuous in nature.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
ekanshgoyal
Joined: 09 Jan 2022
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Location: India
Posts: 62
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aragonn

MAGOOSH Official Explanation:



(A) This question is an example of how the GMAT will sometimes choose an OA that is less than ideal. (A) is an example of such an imperfect sentence. Typically, a comma doesn’t follow “that”. Here it is okay because we are reversing the clause, “we need to converse with a native speaker to speak a foreign language”, becomes “to speak a foreign language, we need to converse with a native speaker”.

(B) The phrase beginning with “with” should logically modify the subject “the paradigm," but in this case it does not logically do so. The paradigm is actually that we need to converse with a native speaker. Thus, this is an example of a misplaced modifier.

(C) A clause beginning with “with” is always suspect on the GMAT, since it usually illogically modifies what comes after the comma. This case is no different. Does the action of foreign-language moving online describe the act of “conversing with a native speaker”? The two are clearly independent. Also, the “which” does not have a clear referent.

(D) implies that the paradigm has become swiftly obsolete. It also says that "the need to converse with a native speaker to speak a foreign language" is the paradigm because foreign language learning moves online. This is illogical and changes the meaning.

(E) After a long beginning adverbial clause, separating the subject “paradigm” from the verb with a long relative clause is a no-no. The more obvious error, however, is the “paradigm, which”. We are describing a specific paradigm, not all paradigms in general. Therefore, we want “that”. Finally, there is a slight change in meaning. The original sentence says the paradigm is becoming obsolete. (E) implies the paradigm has already become obsolete.

Answer: (A)


If i use with clause in starting then it should modify become obsolete? Am I right? Please guide.

Posted from my mobile device
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
495 posts
358 posts