Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 11:39 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 11:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vikasp99
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 263
Own Kudos:
1,890
 [16]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: Canada
Posts: 263
Kudos: 1,890
 [16]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
subrataroy0210
Joined: 04 Aug 2015
Last visit: 18 May 2022
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
88
 [5]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.39
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
Posts: 58
Kudos: 88
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
guptarahul
Joined: 27 Mar 2017
Last visit: 31 Jan 2018
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Status:Gmat lover
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.91
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 56
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IN2MBB2PE
Joined: 20 Aug 2020
Last visit: 17 Feb 2024
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 125
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer choice (C) says that the actual size of the wood boxes are smaller than the natural nesting sites. We don't know how big the natural nesting sites are, nor do we know the size of the wood boxes. So we can't choose (C).

Answer choice (D) says that the wood boxes are less effective now than they would be if they were hidden. We know that the boxes "actually undercut the ducks' reproductive efforts." Also, we know that when nesting sites are hidden "this parasitic behavior is rare." Hiding the nesting sites would improve the situation, so we can infer answer choice (D).
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,161
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,161
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Besides laying eggs in her own nest, any female wood duck will lay an egg in the nest of another female wood duck if she sees the other duck leaving her nest. Under natural nesting conditions, this parasitic behavior is relatively rare because the ducks' nests are well hidden. However, when people put up nesting boxes to help the ducks breed, they actually undercut the ducks' reproductive efforts. These nesting boxes become so crowded with extra eggs that few, if any of the eggs in those boxes hatch.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?


(A) Female wood ducks will establish nests in nest boxes only when natural nesting sites are not available. X

(B) Nesting female wood ducks who often see other female wood ducks are the most successful in their breeding efforts. X

(C) The nesting boxes for wood ducks have less space for eggs than do natural nesting sites. X

(D) The nesting boxes would be more effective in helping wood ducks breed if they were less visible to other wood ducks than they currently are. CORRECT. If the female wood ducks that aren't supposed to be laying their eggs in those makeshift nesting boxes, then the ducks that those boxes are made specifically for would indeed be more effective.

(E) Nesting boxes are needed to supplement the natural nesting sites of wood ducks because of the destruction of much of the ducks' habitat. X
User avatar
ravigupta2912
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2019
Last visit: 16 Feb 2025
Posts: 717
Own Kudos:
299
 [1]
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q46 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 2.58
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument is that female wood ducks have a tendency to breed in other female wood ducks nest IF the other nest is visible. In reality, they are quite well hidden. When people put up nesting boxes (presumably in open), it undermines the reproduction efforts because the parasitic behaviour comes to fore and female wood ducks lay their eggs in it and the nest becomes crowded, leading to no hatch and hence "undermining" reproductive efforts.

Notice what i wrote in bracket is of utmost importance because if some people hid that nest to aid a particular duck, then, the "undermining reproductive efforts" may not happen.

(A) Female wood ducks will establish nests in nest boxes only when natural nesting sites are not available. -- The argument does not bring that out. Eliminate.

(B) Nesting female wood ducks who often see other female wood ducks are the most successful in their breeding efforts. -- The argument gives no info on comparative results of breeding efforts. Eliminate.

(C) The nesting boxes for wood ducks have less space for eggs than do natural nesting sites -- We do not know that and the argument does not suggest anything like that. Eliminate.

(D) The nesting boxes would be more effective in helping wood ducks breed if they were less visible to other wood ducks than they currently are. -- The argument does suggest that when it says "this parasitic behavior is relatively rare because the ducks' nests are well hidden.". Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that if nesting boxes are well hidden (less visible) from other ducks, they may aid reproductive efforts since overcrowding may be avoided.

(E) Nesting boxes are needed to supplement the natural nesting sites of wood ducks because of the destruction of much of the ducks' habitat. -- Again, the argument does not provide us with any such information. Eliminate.


Hi AndrewN - could you please look at my reasoning process? Much appreciated! :)
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,665
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,665
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ravigupta2912
The argument is that female wood ducks have a tendency to breed in other female wood ducks nest IF the other nest is visible. In reality, they are quite well hidden. When people put up nesting boxes (presumably in open), it undermines the reproduction efforts because the parasitic behaviour comes to fore and female wood ducks lay their eggs in it and the nest becomes crowded, leading to no hatch and hence "undermining" reproductive efforts.

Notice what i wrote in bracket is of utmost importance because if some people hid that nest to aid a particular duck, then, the "undermining reproductive efforts" may not happen.

(A) Female wood ducks will establish nests in nest boxes only when natural nesting sites are not available. -- The argument does not bring that out. Eliminate.

(B) Nesting female wood ducks who often see other female wood ducks are the most successful in their breeding efforts. -- The argument gives no info on comparative results of breeding efforts. Eliminate.

(C) The nesting boxes for wood ducks have less space for eggs than do natural nesting sites -- We do not know that and the argument does not suggest anything like that. Eliminate.

(D) The nesting boxes would be more effective in helping wood ducks breed if they were less visible to other wood ducks than they currently are. -- The argument does suggest that when it says "this parasitic behavior is relatively rare because the ducks' nests are well hidden.". Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that if nesting boxes are well hidden (less visible) from other ducks, they may aid reproductive efforts since overcrowding may be avoided.

(E) Nesting boxes are needed to supplement the natural nesting sites of wood ducks because of the destruction of much of the ducks' habitat. -- Again, the argument does not provide us with any such information. Eliminate.


Hi AndrewN - could you please look at my reasoning process? Much appreciated! :)
I agree with your reasoning, Ravi, and I can see why you arrived at the correct conclusion. I felt as though only when was too strong in (A); the superlative most successful was too strong in (B); the comparative less space was purely speculative in (C); and the entire because clause was, again, purely speculative in (E). Well done.

- Andrew
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,431
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,431
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts