P1 - first bimetallic standard then law passed and silver gone.
P2 - Gold only advocates vies.
P3 - bimetallic supporters put depression on gold only.
P4 - limited source problem solved. and so does the main problem.
As main purpose questions are not asked, let me answer them any ways.
3A. Questions that you need to answer after first go.
- What is the issue in hand? --- stopping bimetallism and situation developed around it.
- What is each paragraph's map and on the same lines what is the paragraph's summary? Mind that paragraph's map is more important/helpful. --- given above.
- How many number of theories are there ? What prevalent theories on the matter does the author discuss, and to what extent does he agree with them? --- No theories. but two sides. in favor and in opposition of bimetallism.
- Why does the author usually believe his theory is best? in P4, author seems to be inclining towards gold only.
- What is the main idea? Combine all para's summary. this need not to match one that in answer. still try to do this. --- history for the start of gold only and a debate around the problems rises due to this. and solution of the problem.
- tone - Abstract
1. One reason advocates of bimetallism did not favor a “gold only” standard was that they believed that
Pre-thinking - P4 gave the answer.
A the supply of gold was limited - correct.
--------------------------------------
2. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes that government attempts to control exchange rates
Lines to read - such restraints only inhibit the natural development of a free market.
A compromise the workings of a free economy - Correct.
---------------------------------------
3. According to the passage, bimetallism was not enduring because it
Pre-thinking - P2 is the best place to look for answer. mainly this part "The "gold only" advocates, such as William McKinley, argued that shifts in the relative value of the two precious metals could lead to wild fluctuations in the values of currency in a bimetallic system.".
A made unwarranted conclusions concerning the connection between value and metals --- No such conclusion made.
B was not adopted by those responsible for the shaping of economic policy -- false.
C resulted in persistent inflation that plagued all levels of the economy -- true
D did not allow for the possibility of a third monometallic standard -- no such mention.
E was based on false assumptions regarding both the money supply and the supply of gold --- no
--------------------------------------
4. The author of the passage believes William Jennings Bryant’s argument that a gold standard favors the rich to be
pre-thinking - this will restrict the supply of gold and rich will become more rich while others will not. may be value for the limited gold will increase.
A somewhat relevant, because it accounts for a common trend seen throughout the history of bimetallism --- yes relevant. but not cause of history.
B lacking validity, because it believes increasing the money supply will benefit a segment of the population --- Hmm... there is no proof of it. just an opinion. keeep it.
C without merit, because it is not based on actual historical accounts --- sounds same like b. but if it is not on historic account then it is without merit. makes no sense.
D not entirely accurate, because it overemphasizes the role of silver in regulating the money supply --- could be true as choice is not too extreme but what is the role of silver in making rich to be richer.
E partially correct, because it described some of the class differences between the rich and the poor --- well rich are already rich. what all this situation have to do with this.