pushpitkc
The huge success of the novel The Help
has expanded the author's fan base to tenfold, and nowhere else was that popularity more clearly evident when compared to the three pages devoted to her in the latest issue of Time Magazine.
A.
has expanded the author's fan base
to tenfold, and nowhere else
was that popularity
more clearly evident
when compared to• has expanded and was (evident) cannot coexist (see Split #1)
• to tenfold is wrong; tenfold means "by ten times" or "to ten times the original number."
to tenfold then means TO BY ten times or TO TO ten times the original number. No.
• when a comparison word such as more is already present in the sentence, do not also include any version of "compared to"B.
has expanded the author's fan base[/color]
to tenfold,
and nowhere else was that popularity more clearly evident than in• has expanded and was [color=#0000ff](evident) cannot co-existC. expanded the author's fan base
by tenfold, and nowhere else was that popularity
more clearly evident
as• "
by" tenfold has the same double preposition problem as that in A: BY BY ten times? No. BY TO ten times the original number? No
• the idiom is more . . . than. Never more . . . as.D. expanded the author's fan base tenfold, and nowhere was that popularity
as clearly evident
than in
•
the idiom is as . . . as or more . . . than. Never as . . . than.E. expanded the author's fan base tenfold, and nowhere else was that popularity more clearly evident than in
Source:
Experts Global • Split #1: has expanded and was (evident) cannot coexist in this sentence. The use of
has expanded implies connection to the present,
and we should speak about the phenomenon in the present tense.
Either the expansion of popularity is still in effect or it is not.
If popularity IS still expanding, then that expansion IS now most evident in ABC.
("nowhere else more evident than in ABC" = "most evident in ABC")
If we say that expanded popularity WAS most evident in ABC, then we mean that the expansion began and ended.
The author's popularity began to expand in the past, but "began in the past" does not mean we can talk about evidence of its existence in the simple past tense.
We need to figure out whether the effects continue into the present.
The starting point does not control the second verb tense; whether the event finished controls the second verb tense.
--
This good source, here explains the use of present perfect.
-- if the present is still in play, then we talk about the whole situation in that sense.
-- We would say, "Nowhere else IS that popularity more evident than in ABC"
Options A and B incorrectly use
has expanded and
was evident.Eliminate them.
Split #2: Idioms of comparison with MOREOption C:
more . . . as is never correct
more . . . than is correct
Option D:
as . . . than is never correct
as . . . as is correct
Eliminate C and D.
By POE, option E is the answer. Check.
In the simple past, two things happened:
1) the author's fan base
expanded and
2) that expansion
was most noticeable in a magazine article
tenfold is fine, and the idiom
more . . . than is correct
ANSWER E