DiveshR
WhitEngagePrep,
MartyTargetTestPrep,
BunuelNone of these solutions are making sense to me.
I set up my equation pretty straightforward: P/CP *100 = 20; (x-30)/30*100 = 20; x = 36.
Which makes sense because if we want to make more money, we'd have to sell more apples where SP = CP = 1 rupee.
I have fundamentally misunderstood something.
Edit: x is the number of apples sold for 1 rupee.
I'm not entirely sure what your different variables represent. Can you please confirm that you have set the following variables to mean the following things in your initial equation:
P = Profit
CP = Total Cost
SP = Total Revenue
x = number of apples
sold for 1 rupee
Without variables, I
think that the equation you're going for is the following (total profit as a fraction of total cost given as a percent?)
Total Profit
------------ x 100 = 20
Total Cost
However, total Profit here isn't (x - 30). Profit needs a rupee amount and the units here are in numbers of apples. Your equation is:
"Number of apples we sell for 1 rupee" - "Number of apples we bought for 1 rupee"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x 100 = 20
"Number of apples we bought for 1 rupee"
If anything, this would translate to "the percent change in the number apples from what we bought to what we sold was a 20% increase".
But this isn't the story in the question at all. You also say "to make more money, we'd have to sell more apples where SP = CP = 1 rupee," but now we run into two more logical problems.
First, if SP = CP = 1 rupee, then I cannot be right about how you are defining these, because total cost and total revenue aren't 1 rupee. If they were, there would be a 0 profit.
Second, in the way you (and the story) are defining x, we need to sell FEWER apples for 1 rupee in order to make money. Again, these is number of apples sold for 1 rupee total, not number of apples sold at 1 rupee apiece!
Let's cheat and use a calculator so you can see why we need FEWER apples PER rupee From the question, we buy 30 apples for a rupee (sloppy but that means 1 rupee). So the cost per apple or rupees/apples = 1/30 =0.0333 rupees. That's what we PAID for each apple.
So if we let x as you define it be 36, that means that we are going to sell apples for 36 APPLES PER 1 RUPEE. The price would then be 1/36 =0.0278 rupees per apple.
If we paid 0.0333 for the apples and then sell them for 0.0278, we would be LOSING money.
This is why this problem is so tricky. If you had a calculator, you could just do the division of 1/30 to get that each apple costs 0.0333 rupees. And in order to make a 20% profit on the cost, you'd just multiply 0.0333 * 1.2 in your calculator = 0.03996 and be able to check "YES, this is selling the apples for more than I made for them - I will definitely make a profit!"
So again, I think the issue is a combo of vague and possibly changing definitions that you're using for your variables along with a mistranslation of Profit and Cost.
Hope this helps!

Whit