Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 14:26 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 14:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 13 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,768
Own Kudos:
7,112
 [10]
Given Kudos: 3,305
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,768
Kudos: 7,112
 [10]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
siddharthkapoor
User avatar
GMAT Club Reviews PM Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Last visit: 12 Sep 2025
Posts: 527
Own Kudos:
834
 [1]
Given Kudos: 522
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22 (D)
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.3
Products:
Schools: ISB'22 (D)
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Posts: 527
Kudos: 834
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
redskull1
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Last visit: 25 Sep 2022
Posts: 287
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 115
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
33,428
 [4]
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,428
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nightblade354
Eight large craters run in a long straight line across a geographical region. Although some of the craters contain rocks that have undergone high-pressure shocks characteristic of meteorites slamming into Earth, these shocks could also have been caused by extreme volcanic events. Because of the linearity of the craters, it is very unlikely that some of them were caused by meteorites. Thus, since the craters are all different ages, they were probably caused by volcanic events rather than meteorites.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(A) A similar but shorter line of craters that are all the same age is known to have been caused by volcanic activity

(B) No known natural causes would likely account for eight meteorite craters of different ages forming a straight line

(C) There is no independent evidence of either meteorites or volcanic activity in the region where the craters are located

(D) There is no independent evidence of a volcanic event strong enough to have created the high-pressure shocks that are characteristic of meteorites slamming into Earth

(E) No known single meteor shower has created exactly eight impact craters that form a straight line

Passage Analysis


Eight large craters run in a long straight line across a geographical region.
Eight huge pits formed out of some huge impact are present along a straight line in a particular region of the earth

Although some of the craters contain rocks that have undergone high-pressure shocks characteristic of meteorites slamming into Earth,
One or more of these craters contain rocks whose properties point to a reason of origin as meteorite impact.Still...

these shocks could also have been caused by extreme volcanic events.
It is also possible that extreme volcanic eruptions led to these formations as well.

Because of the linearity of the craters, it is very unlikely that some of them were caused by meteorites.
The chance that one or more of the craters are formed by meteorite impact is extremely low considering that they are placed in an exact straight line.

Thus, since the craters are all different ages,
Also, considering that these craters were formed in different time periods,

they were probably caused by volcanic events rather than meteorites.
The author concludes that the actual reason of formation of this geographical feature are volcanos, not meteorites.

Question Stem: Which one of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
Direct strengthener question

Thought process


The strengthener framework should ask
What new information will make us believe more in the conclusion that the line of craters was formed by volcanos and not meteorites
Given that
they are placed in a straight line but were formed in different ages.

Possible strengtheners:
Any information that tells us that volcanic eruptions can happen along a straight line.
Any information that tells us so many meteorite craters forming a line is extremely unlikely.
Any information that denies a combination of meteors and volcanoes together leading to the formation.

Option Analysis


(A) A similar but shorter line of craters that are all the same age is known to have been caused by volcanic activity
Craters formed during the same period are not similar to the case in hand. Hence this option is irrelevant.

(B) No known natural causes would likely account for eight meteorite craters of different ages forming a straight lineThis option increases our belief in the conclusion that meteorites did not lead to the crater line. This is in line with the second type of strengthener mentioned. Hence a correct answer

(C) There is no independent evidence of either meteorites or volcanic activity in the region where the craters are located
Denies the cause we want to support as well. Cannot be the correct answer.
(D) There is no independent evidence of a volcanic event strong enough to have created the high-pressure shocks that are characteristic of meteorites slamming into Earth
Against the hypothesis supported by the conclusion. Hence not a strengthener.

(E) No known single meteor shower has created exactly eight impact craters that form a straight line
Not relevant because, like option A, it talks about only craters formed during the same time period.

Answer is B.
avatar
Gknight5603
Joined: 26 Oct 2019
Last visit: 03 Apr 2022
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
58
 [2]
Given Kudos: 292
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 129
Kudos: 58
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
nightblade354
Eight large craters run in a long straight line across a geographical region. Although some of the craters contain rocks that have undergone high-pressure shocks characteristic of meteorites slamming into Earth, these shocks could also have been caused by extreme volcanic events. Because of the linearity of the craters, it is very unlikely that some of them were caused by meteorites. Thus, since the craters are all different ages, they were probably caused by volcanic events rather than meteorites.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(A) A similar but shorter line of craters that are all the same age is known to have been caused by volcanic activity

(B) No known natural causes would likely account for eight meteorite craters of different ages forming a straight line

(C) There is no independent evidence of either meteorites or volcanic activity in the region where the craters are located

(D) There is no independent evidence of a volcanic event strong enough to have created the high-pressure shocks that are characteristic of meteorites slamming into Earth

(E) No known single meteor shower has created exactly eight impact craters that form a straight line

Passage Analysis


Eight large craters run in a long straight line across a geographical region.
Eight huge pits formed out of some huge impact are present along a straight line in a particular region of the earth

Although some of the craters contain rocks that have undergone high-pressure shocks characteristic of meteorites slamming into Earth,
One or more of these craters contain rocks whose properties point to a reason of origin as meteorite impact.Still...

these shocks could also have been caused by extreme volcanic events.
It is also possible that extreme volcanic eruptions led to these formations as well.

Because of the linearity of the craters, it is very unlikely that some of them were caused by meteorites.
The chance that one or more of the craters are formed by meteorite impact is extremely low considering that they are placed in an exact straight line.

Thus, since the craters are all different ages,
Also, considering that these craters were formed in different time periods,

they were probably caused by volcanic events rather than meteorites.
The author concludes that the actual reason of formation of this geographical feature are volcanos, not meteorites.

Question Stem: Which one of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
Direct strengthener question

Thought process


The strengthener framework should ask
What new information will make us believe more in the conclusion that the line of craters was formed by volcanos and not meteorites
Given that
they are placed in a straight line but were formed in different ages.

Possible strengtheners:
Any information that tells us that volcanic eruptions can happen along a straight line.
Any information that tells us so many meteorite craters forming a line is extremely unlikely.
Any information that denies a combination of meteors and volcanoes together leading to the formation.

Option Analysis


(A) A similar but shorter line of craters that are all the same age is known to have been caused by volcanic activity
Craters formed during the same period are not similar to the case in hand. Hence this option is irrelevant.

(B) No known natural causes would likely account for eight meteorite craters of different ages forming a straight lineThis option increases our belief in the conclusion that meteorites did not lead to the crater line. This is in line with the second type of strengthener mentioned. Hence a correct answer

(C) There is no independent evidence of either meteorites or volcanic activity in the region where the craters are located
Denies the cause we want to support as well. Cannot be the correct answer.
(D) There is no independent evidence of a volcanic event strong enough to have created the high-pressure shocks that are characteristic of meteorites slamming into Earth
Against the hypothesis supported by the conclusion. Hence not a strengthener.

(E) No known single meteor shower has created exactly eight impact craters that form a straight line
Not relevant because, like option A, it talks about only craters formed during the same time period.

Answer is B.

Thansk for the explanation, but isn't volcanic eruption a natural cause.
In B if meteorites are ruled out so the volcanic eruptions may also be ruled out.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
DmitryFarberMPrep
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,005
Own Kudos:
8,624
 [4]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,005
Kudos: 8,624
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aish5063
The trick there is that B refers to the craters as meteorite craters. So it's not saying that no natural causes could be at work--that would support an argument about human activity or aliens. Rather, it's saying that nothing in nature could have made the meteorites fall in that linear pattern. Basically, it's strengthening the link between a premise (linear pattern) and an intermediate conclusion (unlikely to have been meteorites).
avatar
UsamaGuddar
Joined: 04 Sep 2020
Last visit: 30 Apr 2021
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 34
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts,

Is it a fair thought to discard E because it talks about “exactly 8..” and the argument poses the possibility for “some..that could have been...”

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
DmitryFarberMPrep
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,005
Own Kudos:
8,624
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,005
Kudos: 8,624
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
UsamaGuddar
That's right--the meteorite explanation doesn't require one big event. In fact, the author has stated that the craters are all from different times, so E is puncturing an argument that no one is making.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,162
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How is it B?
"No known natural causes". It's not clear what 'natural clauses' means, but I think I can use common sense and infer that volcanic events are one such natural cause. E seams to weaken not strengthen? The vocab on this threw me off...
User avatar
ahddhah
Joined: 04 Aug 2023
Last visit: 16 Apr 2026
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q88 V79 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q88 V77 DI81
GMAT Focus 3: 655 Q87 V83 DI78
GMAT Focus 3: 655 Q87 V83 DI78
Posts: 60
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is the perfect answer and I was trying to get my head around this one when it said that no natural causes could be at work so my thought was that even volcanic eruption is also natural event so by that logic it seemed like a weekener but now I read your point and it makes sense.

Lovely question and intersting solution
DmitryFarber
aish5063
The trick there is that B refers to the craters as meteorite craters. So it's not saying that no natural causes could be at work--that would support an argument about human activity or aliens. Rather, it's saying that nothing in nature could have made the meteorites fall in that linear pattern. Basically, it's strengthening the link between a premise (linear pattern) and an intermediate conclusion (unlikely to have been meteorites).
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
495 posts
358 posts